Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Gregory Burwell, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding Gregory Burwell's appeal of a district court's denial of his motion to correct a clerical error in his criminal judgment. The appeals court reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials. The appeals court affirmed the district court's denial of Burwell's motion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-01-18 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 11-6995

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding Gregory Burwell's appeal of a district court's denial of his motion to correct a clerical error in his criminal judgment. The appeals court reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials. The appeals court affirmed the district court's denial of Burwell's motion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    8 views2 pages

    United States v. Gregory Burwell, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding Gregory Burwell's appeal of a district court's denial of his motion to correct a clerical error in his criminal judgment. The appeals court reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials. The appeals court affirmed the district court's denial of Burwell's motion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 11-6995

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    GREGORY W. BURWELL,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    Robert E. Payne, Senior
    District Judge. (3:03-cr-00203-REP-1)

    Submitted:

    January 9, 2012

    Decided:

    January 18, 2012

    Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Gregory W. Burwell, Appellant Pro Se.


    Michael Ronald Gill,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Gregory W. Burwell appeals the district courts order
    denying his motion to correct a clerical error in the judgment
    pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 36.
    and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record

    Accordingly, we affirm for the

    reasons stated by the district court.

    See United States v.

    Burwell, No. 3:03-cr-00203-REP-1 (E.D. Va. July 8, 2011).


    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    We

    legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like