Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 5 views

    O'Neal v. Merkel, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the case of Terence Kenneth O'Neal v. T. E. Merkel et al. affirming the district court's denial of relief on O'Neal's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the court affirmed the district court's ruling based on the reasoning in its September 26, 1995 opinion. The court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    O'Neal v. Merkel, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the case of Terence Kenneth O'Neal v. T. E. Merkel et al. affirming the district court's denial of relief on O'Neal's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the court affirmed the district court's ruling based on the reasoning in its September 26, 1995 opinion. The court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-11-18 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 95-7795

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the case of Terence Kenneth O'Neal v. T. E. Merkel et al. affirming the district court's denial of relief on O'Neal's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the court affirmed the district court's ruling based on the reasoning in its September 26, 1995 opinion. The court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views2 pages

    O'Neal v. Merkel, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the case of Terence Kenneth O'Neal v. T. E. Merkel et al. affirming the district court's denial of relief on O'Neal's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the court affirmed the district court's ruling based on the reasoning in its September 26, 1995 opinion. The court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 95-7795

    TERENCE KENNETH O'NEAL,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    T. E. MERKEL; NURSE CASHWELL; NURSE ALLEN;
    NURSE DAVIS; MR. CONN,
    Defendants - Appellees,
    and
    FRANKLIN E. FREEMAN, JR.; GARY DIXON; DOCTOR
    LOWY; DOCTOR SHAW; DOCTOR CASTALLOE; HARRY
    ALLSBROOK; MR. CHERRY,
    Defendants.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District
    Judge. (CA-94-476-5-CT-H)
    Submitted:

    October 31, 1996

    Decided:

    November 18, 1996

    Before WILLIAMS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Terence Kenneth O'Neal, Appellant Pro Se. Mark John Pletzke, NORTH
    CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on
    his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record
    and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. O'Neal
    v. Merkel, No. CA-94-476-5-CT-H (E.D.N.C. Sept. 26, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like