Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Battle v. Bogent, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    10 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Aaron Battle under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against prison medical staff. The district court denied Battle relief and he appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2004-10-21 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 04-7052

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Aaron Battle under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against prison medical staff. The district court denied Battle relief and he appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    10 views2 pages

    Battle v. Bogent, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Aaron Battle under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against prison medical staff. The district court denied Battle relief and he appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 04-7052

    AARON BATTLE,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus

    PAUL BOGENT, Doctor; DOCTOR HASKETTES; NURSE


    HARRIS; NURSE HOUSE,
    Defendants - Appellees,
    and
    DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,
    Defendant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior
    District Judge. (CA-03-277-3)

    Submitted:

    October 14, 2004

    Decided:

    October 21, 2004

    Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Aaron Battle, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Samuel Samet, GOODMAN,


    ALLEN & FILETTI, Glen Allen, Virginia, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Aaron Battle appeals the district courts order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.
    the record and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed

    Accordingly, we affirm

    for the reasons stated by the district court.

    See Battle v.

    Bogent, No. CA-03-277-3 (E.D. Va. May 20, 2004).

    We dispense with

    oral

    contentions

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    legal

    are

    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument


    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like