Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • McBride v. LaManna, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Mark Anthony McBride's petition for habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2241. McBride, a federal prisoner, appealed the district court's ruling. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2006-08-30 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 06-6438

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Mark Anthony McBride's petition for habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2241. McBride, a federal prisoner, appealed the district court's ruling. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    McBride v. LaManna, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Mark Anthony McBride's petition for habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2241. McBride, a federal prisoner, appealed the district court's ruling. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 06-6438

    MARK ANTHONY MCBRIDE,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    JOHN J. LAMANNA, Warden of Federal
    Camp, Edgefield, South Carolina,

    Prison
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Anderson.
    Terry L. Wooten, District Judge.
    (8:05-cv-01682-TLW)

    Submitted: August 24, 2006

    Decided: August 30, 2006

    Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Mark Anthony McBride, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens,


    OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Mark Anthony McBride, a federal prisoner,

    appeals the

    district courts order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. 2241


    (2000)

    petition.

    We

    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by


    the district court.

    McBride v. LaManna, No. 8:05-cv-01682-TLW

    (D.S.C. Feb. 23, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the
    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like