Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Fluellen v. United States, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a court case in which Joshua Fluellen appealed a district court's granting of summary judgment to the United States and other defendants. The district court had dismissed Fluellen's complaint under the Federal Tort Claims Act. The appeals court reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its order, finding that the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2005-01-21 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 04-7774

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a court case in which Joshua Fluellen appealed a district court's granting of summary judgment to the United States and other defendants. The district court had dismissed Fluellen's complaint under the Federal Tort Claims Act. The appeals court reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its order, finding that the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    1 views2 pages

    Fluellen v. United States, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a court case in which Joshua Fluellen appealed a district court's granting of summary judgment to the United States and other defendants. The district court had dismissed Fluellen's complaint under the Federal Tort Claims Act. The appeals court reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its order, finding that the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 04-7774

    JOSHUA FLUELLEN,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; FEDERAL BUREAU OF
    PRISONS; KATHLEEN HAWK-SAWYER; R. E. HOLT; DAN
    DOVE; L. FUERTES ROSARIO; J. A. SERRANO; L.
    GUEVARA,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Columbia.
    Henry F. Floyd, District Judge.
    (CA-03-211-3-26BC)

    Submitted:

    January 13, 2005

    Decided:

    January 21, 2005

    Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Joshua Fluellen, Appellant Pro Se. Raymond Emery Clark, Assistant


    United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Joshua

    Fluellen

    appeals

    district

    court

    judgment

    adopting the magistrate judges report and recommendation, granting


    summary judgment to the United States and the remaining Defendants,
    and dismissing the complaint under the Federal Tort Claims Act
    (FTCA), 28 U.S.C. 2671-2680 (2000).

    We have reviewed the

    record, the magistrate judges report and recommendation, and the


    district courts order and affirm for the reasons stated by the
    district

    court.

    See

    Fluellen

    v.

    United

    States,

    No.

    CA-03-211-3-26BC (D.S.C. filed July 30, 2004 & entered August 2,


    2004).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

    contentions
    materials

    of

    the

    before

    parties

    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like