Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Latrenda Dinote Fleming, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    The document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. It states that Latrenda Dinote Fleming appealed the district court's denial of her motion to correct a clerical error in her case record under Rule 36 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's order denying Fleming's motion. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2014-01-24 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 13-7668

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. It states that Latrenda Dinote Fleming appealed the district court's denial of her motion to correct a clerical error in her case record under Rule 36 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's order denying Fleming's motion. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views2 pages

    United States v. Latrenda Dinote Fleming, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. It states that Latrenda Dinote Fleming appealed the district court's denial of her motion to correct a clerical error in her case record under Rule 36 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's order denying Fleming's motion. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 13-7668

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    LATRENDA DINOTE FLEMING,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
    Anthony John Trenga,
    District Judge. (1:10-cr-00449-AJT-1)

    Submitted:

    January 21, 2014

    Decided: January 24, 2014

    Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Latrenda Dinote Fleming, Appellant Pro Se.


    Paul Nathanson,
    OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Karen Ledbetter Taylor,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Latrenda Dinote Fleming appeals the district courts
    order denying her self-styled Fed. R. Crim. P. 36 motion.
    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    We

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm the district courts order.

    See United

    States

    Va.

    v.

    Fleming,

    No.

    1:10-cr-00449-AJT-1

    Sept. 10, 2013; entered Sept. 11, 2013).

    (E.D.

    filed

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before this court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like