INTERSECTION 6

Location of the Survey: Angel Linao St. Quirino Avenue

Date of Survey: August 5, 2016
Weather: Fair
Surveyors:

Jelyn Alcances
Rengie Ann Argana
Hannah Grace Aringo
Vuaghn Erick Barrantes
Christyl Jane Calipusan
Cyruz Arman Isorena
Lesly Ann Pauline Manaoat
Claire Perez

Google Maps

ISSUE

YES

NO

COMMENT

NOTICEABILITY

VICIBILITY
Is the presence of the intersection

The intersection is noticeable and

visible.
The intersection is a slow speed

obvious to all road users?

If the intersection is located at the

of high speed environment, are

environment. Traffic control

there traffic control devices to

alert drivers?
Is the sight distance (to all drivers)

devices are present to alert drivers.

The sight distance is appropriate to

appropriate for all movement and

all drivers.

users?
LAYOUT, GEOMETRIC DETAILS

Are all conflict points between

Conflict points are safely managed.

vehicles safety managed?

Is the intersection layout obvious

The intersection layout is obvious.

to all users?
Is the alignment of kerfs obvious

The alignment of kerfs is obvious

and appropriate?

sufficient size to store

waiting/turning traffic?
Is the alignment of traffic island
obvious and appropriate?

Are carriage way and lane widths

adequate?

and appropriate.

Are gaps in the central island is

There is no central island

The alignment of traffic island is

Are swept paths for large vehicles

Can all likely vehicles be

accommodated?

obvious and appropriate.

The carriage way and lane width

abide with the standards.

Trailers passing the highway have

okay?

constructed on the road.

difficulty in turning thus, resulting

in conflict.
All type of vehicles can be

accommodated.

The drainage in some road is not

Is cross-fall and drainage

satisfactory?

functional, resulting in flood.

ROAD MARKINGS

Are pavement markings

satisfactory?
Are vehicle paths through the
intersection delineated

The pavement markings are

satisfactory.
The vehicle paths in the area are

satisfactory?
Are all lanes properly marked

good enough.
Some lanes are not marked with

(including arrows)?

arrows.

SIGNING AND LIGHTNING

Is signing adequate?

Is lightning adequate; if
necessary?

Signs are adequate.

Lighting is adequate.
Some signs are not seen by drivers;

Are signs and lightning columns

located properly?

because, its covered by trees, small,

and not properly posted.

PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES

Are pedestrian facilities adequate?

Has consideration been given to

young, elderly, disabled, and

No pedestrian sign or signal

No pedestrian sign or signal

wheelchair band?

resulting to the non-accommodation

of elderly, and disabled.

ROAD SURFACE

If necessary, is antiskid surfacing

provided?

There is no antiskid surfacing

provided.

PICTURES:

Figure 1: NOTICEABILITY AND

VISIBILITY

Figure 2: LAYOUT, GEOMETRIC DETAILS

Figure 3: LAYOUT,
Figure 4:GEOMETRIC
LAYOUT, GEOMETRIC
DETAILS DETAILS

Figure 5: LAYOUT, GEOMTERIC DETAILS

Figure 7: SIGNING AND LIGHTING

Figure 6: LAYOUT, GEOMTERIC DETAILS

INTERSECTION

Location of the Survey: Singalong St. Quirino Avenue

Date of Survey: August 5, 2016
Weather: Fair
Surveyors:

Jelyn Alcances
Rengie Ann Argana
Hannah Grace Aringo
Vuaghn Erick Barrantes
Christyl Jane Calipusan
Cyruz Arman Isorena
Lesly Ann Pauline Manaoat
Claire Perez

Mapbox

ISSUE

YES

NO

COMMENT

NOTICEABILITY

VICIBILITY
Is the presence of the intersection

The intersection is noticeable and

visible.
The intersection is a slow speed

obvious to all road user?

If the intersection is located at the

of high speed environment, are

environment. Traffic control

there traffic control devices to

alert drivers?
Is the sight distance (to all drivers)

devices are present to alert drivers.

The sight distance is appropriate to

appropriate for all movement and

all drivers.

users?
LAYOUT, GEOMETRIC DETAILS

Are all conflict points between

Conflict points are safely managed.

vehicles safety managed?

Is the intersection layout obvious

The intersection layout is obvious.

to all users?
Is the alignment of kerfs obvious

The alignment of kerfs is obvious

and appropriate?

sufficient size to store

waiting/turning traffic?
Is the alignment of traffic island
obvious and appropriate?

Are carriage way and lane widths

adequate?

and appropriate.

Are gaps in the central island is

There is no central island

The alignment of traffic island is

Are swept paths for large vehicles

Can all likely vehicles be

accommodated?

obvious and appropriate.

The carriage way and lane width

abide with the standards.

Trailers passing the highway have

okay?

constructed on the road.

difficulty in turning thus, resulting

in conflict.
All type of vehicles can be

accommodated.

Is cross-fall and drainage

satisfactory?

The drainages are functional.

ROAD MARKINGS

Are pavement markings

satisfactory?
Are vehicle paths through the
intersection delineated

satisfactory?
Are all lanes properly marked
(including arrows)?

The pavement markings are

satisfactory.
The vehicle paths in the area are

good enough.

The lanes are properly marked

Signs are adequate.

Lighting is adequate.

SIGNING AND LIGHTNING

Is signing adequate?

Is lightning adequate; if

necessary?
Are signs and lightning columns
located properly?

Signs and lightings are properly

located.

PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES

Are pedestrian facilities adequate?

Has consideration been given to

young, elderly, disabled, and

The pedestrian signal does not light.

Because there are no timers,

wheelchair band?

consideration for them has not been

given.

ROAD SURFACE

If necessary, is antiskid surfacing

provided?

There is no antiskid surfacing

provided.

PICTURES:

Figure 1: NOTICEABILITY AND VISIBILITY

Figure 2: ROAD MARKINGS

Figure 3: ROAD MARKINGS

Figure 4: LAYOUT, GEOMETRIC DETAILS

Figure 5: LAYOUT, GEOMETRIC DETAILS

Figure 6: SIGNING AND LIGHTING

Figure 7: SIGNING AND LIGHTING

Figure 8: ROAD MARKINGS

Figure 9: SIGNING AND LIGHTING

Figure 10: LAYOUT, GEOMETRIC DETAILS