Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SSRP Paper Austin Ryan
SSRP Paper Austin Ryan
All photometry observations were taken using the 30 telescope at the McDonald Observatory in
Fort Davis, Texas using its prime focus camera (PFC). The PFC uses a Loral-Fairchild nitrogen
cooled 2048x2048 pixel chip. The Johnson B and V filters were used. The readout time for this
chip is quite long and the field of view is larger than needed so only the central portion of the chip
was used. Using a 750x750 pixel region resulted in a field of view of around 15 arcminutes and a
readout time of just over 70 seconds. This allowed us to achieve a faster cadence and more
complete lightcurves. Dark current is negligible for this LN2 cooled instrument. Dome flat field
frames and bias frames were taken frequently for all observing runs.
2.2 Observing Runs and Targets
The SDSS ID, coordinates, dates, and observers are listed in Table 1. The photometry taken for
V2477 cyg was taken on site from July 24th 29th, 2015 with exposure times of 15 sec in the
Johnson B filter and 10 sec in the Johnson V filter. Both NSVS stars were observed using the same
telescope but remotely at Bruner Hall of Science at UNK. These observations were taken from
December 18th 21st, 2015 and from January 4th 7th, 2016. For NSVS00470320 and
NSVS12657149, the respective exposure times were 30 and 50 sec in the Johnson B filter and 20
and 35 sec in the Johnson V filter. V0372 Dra was observed from June 14th. 2016 through June
19th, 2016 with exposure times of 10 sec in the Johnson V filter and 15 in Johnson B filter. These
fairly short exposure times, along a CCD readout time of 70 seconds, allowed us to take 150-200
exposures per night if the same field was observed the entire night with permitting weather.
Star
RA (2000)
Dec
Dates
V2477 Cyg
304.7456
56.6054
NSVS00470320
45.2484
78.5801
NSVS12657149
106.7541
6.5832
V0372 Dra
261.4201
59.2587
Observers
W. L. Powell Jr., Austin Ryan, Gabe
Wieczorek, Evan Folk
W. L. Powell Jr., Austin Ryan
W. L. Powell Jr., Austin Ryan
W. L. Powell Jr., Austin Ryan
All comparison stars used for these three eclipsing binaries were found using the AAVSO
Photometric All-Sky Survey (APASS). These comparisons were chosen based on their similarity
in color and magnitude to the literature values discussed in the introduction section. As shown
Powell et al (2015), using the full all-sky absolute photometry calculations, the color differences
could introduce error if we used comparison stars that were not similar in color to the certain
variable we are studying.
V2477 Cyg
Comparison
RA (2000)
Dec (2000)
Number of
Observations
V error
B error
B-V
C1
304.81463
56.587832
12.514
0.182
13.095
0.032
0.581
C2
304.681054
56.66133
12.376
0.036
12.971
0.023
0.595
C3
304.700175
56.505403
12.254
0.164
12.931
0.022
0.677
C4
304.909054
56.544552
11.678
0.195
12.322
0.029
0.644
NSVS00470320
Comparison
RA (2000)
Dec (2000)
Number of
Observations
V error
B error
B-V
C1
45.356305
78.538379
10.756
0.05
11.448
0.089
0.692
C2
45.628474
78.664855
10.822
0.05
11.27
0.09
0.448
NSVS12657149
Comparison
RA (2000)
Dec (2000)
Number of
Observations
V error
B error
B-V
C1
106.762449
6.641248
13.097
0.023
13.729
0.033
0.632
C2
106.858359
6.643391
13.403
0.03
13.987
0.036
0.584
C3
106.863728
6.567215
13.086
0.069
13.608
0.058
0.522
V0372 Dra
Comparison
RA (2000)
Dec (2000)
Number of
Observations
V error
B error
B-V
C1
261.509134
59.178551
11.905
0.037
12.345
0.044
0.44
C2
261.546953
59.250980
11.200
0.030
12.000
0.043
0.80
C3
261.232001
59.298351
11.719
0.064
12.294
0.010
0.575
C4
261.439401
59.313655
12.043
0.043
12.867
0.045
0.824
C5
261.565946
59.310287
13.578
0.042
14.302
0.032
0.724
Tables 2, 3, and 4: APASS comparison stars for each binary observed. The data listed are drawn
from the APASS catalog.
(3)
and
(4)
The OER Is the OConnell Effect Ratio and the LCA is the Light Curve Asymmetry1. The OER is the ratio
of the area under the curves for the first and second LC. The LCA measures how the two halves of the LC
depart from symmetry. The LCA will grow as the LCs become more asymmetric. One of these could imply
no OCE while the other suggests an OCE (for example, a tall narrow maximum and a wide short maximum
with equal areas underneath the curve (OER = 1) but this would show an LCA not equal to zero 2. The
presence of the OCE would imply some factor that causes the maximum in the LC to change, most likely
due to star spots.
Fig 1. Fourier fits to the objects analyzed for their OCE. The lightcurves are phased in such a way
that the OCE is more visible. Their OER and LCA are also displayed.
3.3 Parameters and 3D Models
Using the software package Binary Maker 3 (BM3) (Bradstreet 2005), an iterative approach was
used on the parameters (such as temperature and mass ratio) to match the LC of each star. BM3
also creates a 3D plot of the star from the inputted mass ratio, fillout factors, inclination, and
starspots. Figure 2 displays each 3D model with their respective fitted LC. Parameter values for
each star can be found in Table 5.
NSVS00470320
NSVS12657149
V2477 Cyg
V0372 Dra
Figure 2: 3D Models of each system and their spot, along with their measured light curve (red
points) and fitted light curve from Binary Maker 3 (blue points).
NSVS0047320
NSVS12657149
V2477 Cyg
V0372 Dra
Mass Ratio
2.17
1.65
Fillout Factor
-0.002
0.225
0.67
Temp 1
5800K
7900K
6459K
6000K
Temp 2
8200K
5250K
6000K
7900K
Inclination
65.2
78.7
86
76.5
Spot Coalitude
50
70
80
90
Spot Longitude
140
320
110
260
Spot Radius
15
4.8
15
19
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
Table 5: Physical parameters used to fit each LC in BM3. One spot was used for each system.
4. Conclusions
We have shown our results on this photometric study of three eclipsing binary stars. Both the BM3 and
OCE analysis suggest that NSVS00470320 and V0372 Dra are Beta Lyrae type variables, and that V2477
Cyg appears to be transitioning from a Beta Lyrae to a W Uma type. Although we were not able to analyze
the OCE for NSVS12657149, BM3 results suggest that this is a near-contact or contact variable - although
due to the lack of data at its maxima, we cannot come to the conclusion that this is the case. When fitting
the lightcurves using BM3 as shown in Fig 2., a spot was needed for each star in order to account for their
OCE, the strongest of which is V0372 Dra. It is easy to see that a large spot was needed in order to account
for the large difference in brightness between its two maximas. Similar solutions, such as one with two
smaller spots in order to account for the OCE instead of one large one, seemed to have work as well when
using BM3. These preliminary results will be crucial in understanding how the OCE effects change over
time, which will give us an understanding of the origin of the OCE.
References
1