Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Pterygium in Indonesia: Prevalence, Severity and Risk Factors
Pterygium in Indonesia: Prevalence, Severity and Risk Factors
WORLD VIEW
Br J Ophthalmol 2002;86:13411346
Series editors: W V Good
and S Ruit
.......................
Correspondence to:
Mr Gus Gazzard,
Department of Wound
Healing, Institute of
Ophthalmology, Bath
Street, London EC1V 9EL,
UK; gusgazzard@
hotmail.com
Accepted for publication
16 July 2002
.......................
Aim: To determine prevalence rates, severity, and risk factors for pterygium in adults in provincial
Indonesia and to validate a clinical grading scheme in a population based setting.
Methods: A population based prevalence survey of 1210 adults aged 21 years and above was conducted in five rural villages and one provincial town in Riau province, Sumatra, Indonesia, an area
near to the equator. A one stage household cluster sampling procedure was employed: 100
households were randomly selected from each village or town. Pterygia were graded for severity (T1
to T3, by visibility of episcleral vessels) and the basal and apical extent measured by an ophthalmologist (GG) with a hand held slit lamp. Refraction was measured by hand held autorefractor (Retinomax).
Face to face household interviews assessed outdoor activity, occupation, and smoking. The participation rate was 96.7%.
Results: The mean age was 36.6 years (SD 13.1), 612 were male. The age adjusted prevalence rate
of any pterygium was 10.0% (95% confidence intervals (CI) 8.2 to 11.7) and of bilateral pterygia was
4.1% (95% CI 2.9 to 5.3). There was a significant dose-response relation with age (2.9% (95% CI 0.4
to 5.8) for 2129 years versus 17.3% (95% CI 10.4 to 24.2) 50 years and above; p for trend <0.001)
and occupations with more time outdoors (p for trend = 0.02). This was true for both sexes, all grades
of lesion (T1 to T3), and bilateral disease. A multivariate logistic regression model showed pterygium
was independently related to increasing age and outdoor activity 10 years earlier. The mean basal
diameter = 3.3 mm (SD 1.51, range 0.19.5) and extent from limbus = 1.4 mm (SD 1.18, range 0.1
8.0). Higher grade pterygia were larger for basal and apical extent (p for trend <0.001). The presence
of pterygium was associated with astigmatism (defined as cylinder at least 0.5 dioptres (D); p
<0.001). This association increased with increasing grade of lesion (p for trend <0.001). Median cylinder for those with pterygium (0.50 D) was greater than for those without (0.25D), (p <0.001), and
increased with higher grade of lesion (p for trend <0.001). For eyes with pterygia, magnitude of astigmatism was associated with greatest extent from the limbus, (p = 0.03), but not basal width (p = 0.99).
Conclusions: There is a high prevalence rate of pterygia in provincial Sumatra. The independent
increase with age and past outdoor activity (a surrogate for sun exposure) is consistent with previous
findings. Clinical grading of pterygium morphology by the opacity of the lesion was a useful additional
marker of severity.
METHODS
www.bjophthalmol.com
1342
Table 1
All ages
Crude rate
Age adjusted rate*
Total (n=1210)
Men (n=612)
Women (n=598)
(n)
1210
612
598
Age (years)
2129
3039
4049
50and above
p (trend)
414
393
201
202
185
212
104
111
229
181
97
91
584
430
196
294
217
101
290
213
95
Smoking
Never smoked
Ever smoked
p value
625
585
105
507
520
78
Occupation
Level 0
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Level 4
p (trend)
594
110
74
63
369
149
66
28
54
315
445
44
46
9
54
568
642
208
404
434
164
575
635
228
384
407
191
Outdoor activity
5 years ago
>5 hours/day
<5 hours/day
p value
10 years ago
>5 hours/day
<5 hours/day
p value
www.bjophthalmol.com
Pterygium in Indonesia
Table 2
1343
Age and sex specific prevalence rates of the different grades of pterygia (n = 1210)
Prevalence rates (95% CI)
All ages
Crude rate
Age adjusted rate*
No
1210
Grade I pterygia
(Transparent)
Grade II pterygia
(Intermediate)
Bilateral pterygia
1.0 (0.0,
1.0 (0.0,
2.5 (0.0,
5.4 (2.2,
0.001
1.2 (0.0,
2.5 (1.4,
7.5 (2.2,
7.4 (3.0,
<0.001
Age (years)
2130
3140
4150
51 and above
p (trend)
414
393
201
202
0.1 (0.0,
2.8 (2.0,
3.9 (0.4,
5.9 (2.2,
<0.001
Sex
Male
Female
p value
612
598
575
635
2.2)
3.6)
7.6)
9.7)
2.2)
2.7)
6.1)
8.7)
3.0)
3.6)
12.7)
11.9)
RESULTS
The mean age was 36.6 years (SD 13.1). There were 612 males
and 598 females. The proportion of villagers who owned a
radio was 56.6%, 59.4% owned a television set, and electricity
was available in 82.3% of the dwellings. Eighty six per cent
were married, 8.4% single, and 5.6% were widowed or
divorced.
The overall age adjusted prevalence rate of any pterygia in
adults over 21 was 10.0% (95% CI 8.2 to 11.7). The age-sex
specific prevalence rates of pterygia are shown in Table 1. The
rates for all adults over 40 years were 16.8% (95% CI 10.8 to
22.8) overall, 16.1% (95% CI 8.3 to 24.0) for males and 17.6%
(95% CI 12.8 to 2.4) for females.
The rates in subjects over 51 years were six times that of the
2130 year olds (17.3% v 2.9%). The dose-response relation
with age was similar for males and females. The prevalence in
the greatest income group was half that of the lowest (5.65%
v 10.1%) though this was not significant (p = 0.095). There
was no significant difference in the rates of pterygia by side
(right 6.4% (95% CI 5.1 to 7.8); left 6.6% (95% CI: 4.5 to 8.8),
p = 0.8) or sex (males 10.0% (95% CI 7.4 to 12.5); females
8.5% (95% CI: 5.5 to 11.6), p = 0.37). A history of smoking was
not significantly related to pterygium in the univariate analysis (no smoking history 9.4% (95% CI 6.8 to 12.2); any smoking history 9.1 (95% CI: 5.8 to 12.2), p = 0.82). There was no
difference in the location (nasal v temporal), grade, extent or
www.bjophthalmol.com
1344
Table 3
All pterygia
(n = 163)
Grade III
Grade I pterygia Grade II pterygia pterygia
(transparent)
(intermediate)
(opaque)
(n = 89)
(n = 42)
(n = 32)
p Value
3.3 (1.51)
(0.19.5)
2.6 (1.29)
(0.16.0)
3.7 (1.8)
(1.06.0)
4.5 (1.5)
(1.59.5)
<0.001
(for trend)
1.4 (1.18)
(0.18.0)
1.0 (0.71)
(0.13.0)
1.6 (0.9)
(0.54.0)
2.3 (1.9)
(0.58.0)
<0.001)
(for trend)
152 (93)
11 (7)
80 (90)
9 (10)
42 (100)
0 (0)
30 (94)
2 (6)
0.1
82 (50)
81 (50)
47 (53)
42 (47)
19 (45)
23 (55)
16 (50)
16 (50)
0.72
No (%)
Location
Nasal
Temporal
Affected eye
Right
Left
prevalence of lesions was seen for all three grades (Table 3).
The basal width and the extent from the limbus all increased
with increasing grade, but there was no variation by
nasal/temporal location or side. Five individuals had three
pterygia, two subjects had four lesions, and 45 had bilateral
disease.
The presence of pterygium (by individual) was significantly
associated with the presence of astigmatism (cylinder > 0.5
dioptre (D), p <0.001). This association increased with
increasing grade of lesion (p for trend <0.001). The median
cylinder for those individuals with pterygium was greater
than for those without (0.50D v 0.25D, p <0.001), and
increased with higher grades of lesion (p for trend <0.001).
For eyes with pterygia, the distance a lesion extended from the
limbus was greater in those with astigmatism than those
without (median 1.25 mm v 1.0 mm, p = 0.03). The basal
width was greater but not significantly so (median 3.6 mm v
3.4 mm, p = 0.99). The effects of wearing spectacles could not
be assessed as only 11 individuals habitually wore distance
correction; none of these had pterygia. Similarly, very few
individuals ever wore sunglasses.
The visual acuity (VA) of eyes with pterygia was worse than
for eyes without pterygia, (median logMAR acuity 0.1 v 0.2,
p<0.001: in the 45 cases of bilateral lesions the eye with the
higher grade lesion was considered). The relation between
grade of lesion and VA was not significant (median VA for
grade 1 lesions = 0.2, with grade 2 = 0.2 and grade 3 = 0.3, p
Table 4 A multiple logistic regression model with multivariate adjusted odds ratios
of pterygium for various risk factors
Crude OR (95% CI)
p Value
Sex
0.37
0.08
Age (years)
2130
3140
4150
51and above
1.00
2.97 (1.20 to 7.34)
6.58 (1.95 to 22.10)
7.02 (2.14 to 23.02)
0.002
<0.001
<0.001
1.00
2.79 (1.17 to 6.89)
6.36 (1.89 to 21.39)
7.31 (2.36 to 22.70)
0.003
<0.001
<0.001
0.001
1.00
1.64 (0.96 to 2.80)
0.02
Smoking
Never smoked
Ever smoked
0.82
1.00
0.46 (0.24 to 0.90)
0.004
1.00
0.96 (0.57 to 1.60)
*From a multiple logistic regression model that simultaneously includes all factors present.
www.bjophthalmol.com
Pterygium in Indonesia
DISCUSSION
1345
www.bjophthalmol.com
1346
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Authors affiliations
REFERENCES
www.bjophthalmol.com