Professional Documents
Culture Documents
V GMP Posting Aug 22
V GMP Posting Aug 22
',
;.#Hffili-"
FORM 44
WILSCIfi,I
Au6
t2
tLtg
No.
CIry OF VANCOUVER
Risk Management
AUG 2
5-165441
Vancouver Registry
2016
RECEIVED
Between
Darcy Delainey as CFA and Wonser De-Gbon as CEO of VGMP
Vancouver
Bill Blair, as Parliamentary Assistant to the AG
[,IERE$F AOMITTEO
,r,AU&,l 2
BC
Defendant(s)
by:
To:
Darcy Delainey
His
fAKE NOTICE that We seek a ruling to have Bill Blair and Jody Wilson-Raybould, as our MP explain themselves'
ln a July 27, Notice, Mr. Khan insists that Bill Blair cannot appear, and .Jody Wilson-Raybould
cannot participate, by creating a fictitious straw man called DELAYNEY, Darcy et al, which is a
violation of Sec 15 of the Charter of being treated as equal before and under the law. As we
see it, we will be deprived of a right to a fair civil proceeding without striking this obstruction
We were delayed from filing on or before the 35-day window [in this case file] because we
were waiting for a letter from our MP, which we received a few days later [as to the point
abovel and then a new case file was served, by a lawyer for the City called Mr. Dixon, who
started a separate Petition [case file no. S - 166352]. As we see it, this tactic of totally
ignoring this Civil Claim, results where ultimately Gregor Robertson is actually condoning
therefore violating Sec279 CC by insisting that we are an ALL CAPITAL ENTITY;
ln other words, the City is insisting that it holds jurisdiction over our Electoral District Offices.
FURTHERMORE the timing of these actions implies a seditious conspiracy by Jody Wilson
Raybould [the AGI Gregor Robertson and Bill BIair to advocate the abuse of power without
the authority of law [Sec 59 CC - Seditious conspiracyl and in so doing are insisting on
accomplishing fundamental governmental change in Canada.
ON THIS: We are standing under the law being Supreme. As officers of a recognized Loyal
Opposition Party, under the Elections Act, has always meant that we hold fundamental rights
to protect our beliefs from any City intrusion. We seek protection under positive law to
uphold our RUBRIC under R v Smith /SCC. The time honored way to accomplish this is by-
07
/2010
2016
WILI-IAM F. PENTNEY
Solicitor for
A.G.C.
and
His Worship Gregor Robertson, Mayor of
Page 1 of2
insisting that this BC Supreme Court respect our 'no jurisdiction defense' as fundamental.
lN CONCLUSION: We seekto proceed as equals, in private chambers, if you desire.
We are asking this court to strike this pending case file no. S - 166352, as being frivolous and
or vexatious, and proceed to set a court date, at the earliest opportunity.
Date:
TO:
lain
Dixon
As prescribed by law, in our Party's official policy - every EDA is autonomous, and we stand under our
political guarantees to protect this EDA's multicultural beliefs. Our EDA does not promote any OPCA
positions , because apparently they don't work.
Yours Sincerely.