6 40 -27 2010 1

2009/3/15

**

***

2009/12/3

:

) (36 .
) 47 58(
2009/2008



.






) . :
(.

Obstacles of the Application of E-Learning Systems as

Viewed by Secondary School Teachers at Al-Kurah
District
Ayed El-Hersh, Faculty of Education, Yarmouk University, Irbid,
Jordan.
Mohammed Muflih, Faculty of Science and Arts, Jordan University
Of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.
Mamoun Aldhoon, Ministry of Education, Amman, Jordan.
Abstract: This study aimed at investigating the obstacles that hinder
the application of the e-learning system as viewed by secondary stage
teachers at Al-Kurah district. A sample consisting of 47 male and 58
female teachers was randomly chosen during the first semester of the
academic year 2008/2009. The results of the study indicated that
teacher-related obstacles ranked first, followed by administrationrelated obstacles, then infrastructure and equipment-relate obstacles
and finally student-related obstacles. The results also indicated that
there were statistically significant differences attributed to gender in
favor of males in the domain of the obstacles related to infrastructure
and basic equipment. The results showed significant statistical
differences attributed to academic qualifications in student-related
obstacles in favor of teachers with a master's degree. However, no
statistically significant differences were revealed due to the effect of
training courses in all study fields. The researchers recommended that
the training courses held by the Ministry of Education be evaluated
and the infrastructure and its equipment be improved. (Keywords:
Obstacles, E-Learning, Learning system, Instructional technology).

:







)
.(2005
) (E-learning

)
.(2005
) (2008
:





.


-
)

_________________________
* .
** .
*** .
2010 .

27

.(2007 )(Eduwave


3200
)
.(2006






.

:

) (Eduwave



).(2007

)
.(2006



. ) (2003


.

.
) (Rodny, 2002

. ) (Khan, 2003


.
) (2002


.


) (2007 :



.
) (Khazaleh & Jawarneh, 2006

:




.

) (12-1

) .(2008
:






.

:






28

- -
:

) (0.05=

:

:
:

.2009/2008
.
:


:
) (Naida, 2003 "
"

) (Manchester Metropolitan University

.



.
) (2003


)1423/1422(
) (26 ) (177

.
) (2006
:








.

:




.





.




.
:

:
-

:


.

:




.

29

) Khazaleh & Jawarneh,

.

.

.


.


.
) (Conna, 2007 "
)( "



) (270

%86



.
) (2007




.


)) (112 (
) ( )
( ) (1387

.
:
.

(2006

.
) (61



:






.
) (2006



) (420
2006/2005


.

.



.





.
) (2006

) (600
) (39.



30

.
) (2007

.
) (28
) (118

) CD CD+
(Data Show + ) .
)
:

.

:










.
)(Anderson, 2008

. ) (1887
2004 2007


.
:
) ( )
( )( .




) Naida, 2003
2006 (2007
) (2006

) (Anderson, 2008
) 2007 2006
(Khazaleh & Jawarneh, 2006
) (2003
).(Conna, 2007

:



) 2003
20072007 2006 Khazaleh
.(& Jawarneh, 2006




) (2007


.
:

2009/2008
)155) (346 191(.
) (105
) (%30
) (1

.
) :(1

31

47
58

44.8
55.2

46
29
30

43.8
27.6
28.6

90
15

85.7
14.3

105

100.0

-2

:

:
) (40

)(36
: )
( )(7
) (
) (11 )
( ) (8 )
( ) (10.
:
) ( .
(5): ) (4
) (3
.

-3
-4

-5

:




.


.


%0.84 - %0.90
) (2
.

:
:
-1 :
) : (. ) : (.
) : (.








.

) :(2

.
.
.
.

.

.


.

) 5-4.5
4.49-3.5 -3.49-2.5
2.49-1.5 -1.49-1 (






.

0.90
0.85
0.77
0.84

-2 :
:

:
:
-1
.

:
.
: .
: .
32

: .

:




.

" :

"

) (3 .

) :(3

1
3
3.99
2
4
3.70
3
1
3.68
4
2
3.63

) (3
):(3
)(3.99
: :
)(3.70


) (4 .
)(3.68
) (3.63

.66
.74
1.14
.68

) :(4 " "

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

21
23
24
19
20
26
22
25

) (4 "
" )(4.52
) .(0.68
) (7-2
) (3.62-4.26
) (1.13-0.90 ) (8

4.52

.68

4.26

.90

4.23

1.07

4.16

1.12

3.95

1.12

3.76

1.11

3.62

1.13

3.44

1.29

) (3.44
).(1.29
: :

) (5 .

33

) :(5 " "

1
2

28
35

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

32
36
27
34
31
33
30
29

) (5 )(7-1

) (3.61-4.33 ).(0.88-0.91
) (10-8
) (2.90-3.23
).(1.30-1.27

4.33
4.33

.91
.91

4.01

1.06

4.00

1.37

3.90

.88

3.74

1.32

3.61

.88

3.23

1.27

2.91

1.32

2.90

1.30

:
:

) (6
.

) :(6 "
"

1
2
3

5
6
1
2
3
4
7

4
5
6
7

) (6 )-1
(7
) (3.52-3.84 )-1.11
.(1.23

3.84

1.11

3.76

1.10

3.67

1.54

3.67

1.33

3.66

1.39

3.66

1.38

3.52

1.23

: :

) (7 .

34

) :(7 " "

10

2
3
4

11
17
8

16

6
7
8
9
10
11

14
18
13
12
15
9

) (7 ) (5-1
)-4.43
(3.74 ) (1.08-0.86
) (11-6
)(3.00-3.44
).(1.07-1.14




.





.



) ( )
(

4.43

.86

4.40

.84

4.11
4.10

1.02
1.02

3.74

1.08

3.44

1.14

3.26

1.04

3.23

1.23

3.17

1.16

3.04

1.16

3.00

1.07

.
)
(




) (2003
.
) (2006


.
) (Khazaleh & Jawarneh, 2006

. ) (2006


) (Conna, 2007
.


35

) ( )
(





(Khazaleh & Jawarneh,
) 2006


) (2007
) (2007

) (Naida, 2003

.


.











.









.
) (Anderson, 2008
)

( .
) (2007


.
) (Khazaleh & Jawarneh, 2006

.
) (2006 .



)
(
)
( .

.












.




. Anderson,
) (2008 .
) Khazaleh & Jawarneh,
(2006
.
) (2006
.
) (2007

36

" :

"

) (8 .

)(0.05 =

) :(8

4.10

3.81

4.14

3.82

3.94

0.72

0.63

0.65

0.77

0.61

3.34

3.48

3.87

3.60

3.57

1.30

0.69

0.65

0.69

0.70

3.44

3.47

3.92

3.55

3.59

1.24

0.63

0.63

0.72

0.68

3.74

3.50

3.96

3.77

3.72

1.18

0.66

0.71

0.67

0.63

3.99

4.00

4.14

3.86

3.99

0.87

0.64

0.68

0.80

0.68

3.68

3.66

4.03

3.67

3.75

1.13

0.61

0.61

0.74

0.64

3.67

3.44

3.77

3.85

3.67

1.22

0.98

0.93

0.74

0.93

) (8

.

).(9

) :(9

""

7.574

7.574

7.046

.009

.592

.592

1.468

.229

37

""

.575

.575

1.489

.225

.274

.274

.529

.469

.847

.423

.394

.675

3.639

1.819

4.513

.013

.301

.150

.390

.678

1.046

.523

1.012

.367

.914

.914

.850

.359

.067

.067

.166

.685

.167

.167

.434

.512

.994

.994

1.922

.169

1558.531

105

1430.174

105

1719.969

105

1491.540

105

135.317

104

47.688

104

45.963

104

56.309

104

) (9 )

) (Scheffe
) .(10
) (0.05 =
.
) ( 4.00
) (3.50
)
( )(
) ( ) (4.00
)( ).(3.74




.

= (0.05

.
) (0.05 =

) :(10 ) (Scheffe

3.47
3.50
4.00

.03
*.53

*.50

) (10 )

= (0.05 ) (
) ( ) (
38

. )
(2006
) (2006
.










.
) (2006



.

:
) .(2007 .
.63-60(3)45
) 10 .(2008
. -
.33
) .(2007

.
29-27 .2007
) .(2002
.
17-16 1423 .
) .(2003


.
.
) .(2006
: . 2008 /11 /15
www.elearning.edu.sa
) .(2007 . :
.
) .(2005

.

17-15
.2005

:
:

.

.

) .(2008 -
- . : .
) .(2006

.
.

39

Anderson, A. (2008). Seven major challenges for elearning in developing countries: Case study EBIT,
Sri Lanka. International Journal of Education and
Development using ICT,4(3). Retrieved from:
http://www.ijedict.dec.uwi.edu//viewarticle.php?id
=472&layout=html
Conna, B. (2007). An Investigation of Incorporating
online Courses in public high school curricula.
Retrieved from: http://www.proquset.umi.com
Khan, B. (2002). Dimensions of E-learning.
Educational Technology, 1(42), 59-60
Khazaleh, T. And Jawarneh, T. (2006). Barriers to
effective information technology integration in
Jordanian schools as perceived by in-service
teachers. Jordan Journal of Educational Sciences,
2(4): 281-292.
Naida, S. (2003). Trends in faculty use and perceptions
of E-learning. Learning & Teaching in Action.
2(3), 29-36.
Rodny, S. (2002). The integration of instructional
technology into public education: Promises and
challenges. Educational Technology, 1(42), 5- 13.

.(2003)
.
.1424/2/20
.(2007)
. :
2008/ 11 /20
www.kau.edu.sa

.(2006)

www.itgsolution.com 2009/2/11
.(2006)

-184(4)7 .
.206

.(2005)
. : .
.(2006)
2009/2/11 .
www.elearning.jo

40