Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Limitations of The Hollomon Strain-Hardening Equation
Limitations of The Hollomon Strain-Hardening Equation
Search
Collections
Journals
About
Contact us
My IOPscience
This content has been downloaded from IOPscience. Please scroll down to see the full text.
1974 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 7 969
(http://iopscience.iop.org/0022-3727/7/7/305)
View the table of contents for this issue, or go to the journal homepage for more
Download details:
IP Address: 200.130.19.170
This content was downloaded on 07/09/2016 at 16:57
01974
1. Introduction
Any attempt to rationalize the factors which affect the strength of polycrystalline metals
invariably involves the determination and analysis of tensile true-stressltrue-strain
curves. A single curve provides information on the strength, ductility and strainhardening behaviour of the material, and a variety of parameters are used to describe
each of these properties (Kostron 1951, Marin and Sharma 1958, Panknin and Shawki
1961). For example, strain hardening may be given in terms of a rate of hardening,
du/dcp, determined from the slope of the true-stress/true-strain curve at a given strain.
Alternatively, the magnitude of the strain hardening over a given strain increment
(2 - 1) may be denoted by the difference in the flow stress values over this increment, ie
KcPm
Presented at the Meeting on The Relevance of the Tension Test Parameters in Evaluating the Mechanical Properties of Polycrystalline Metals, University of Aston, Birmingham (7 November 1972).
969
970
where a is the true flow stress, is the true plastic strain, K is the strength coefficient,
and n is the strain-hardening exponent. The exponent n is given by (Dieter 1961, Marin
or
d a -nu
- .
dEP ED
It can also be shown that
also Wilson 1974).
n=EU,
Table 1. Typical n and K values for ferrous and non-ferrous metals and alloys from the
equation a =
K
K
(MNm-2) (ksi) n
Material
Aluminium
AI-2.5Cu-1.5 Mg
A1-4'5C~-1.5 Mg
Nickel
Copper
70-30 brass
0.05 C steel
15 Mn-0.41C steel
(at 500 "C)
430 stainless steel
SAE 4130 stainless steel
0.59 C steel
Iodide titanium
Commercial-purity
titanium
Ti-O.9AI-1 .O Mn
Ti-4Al
Ti-2Xr-2.5Mo
Ti-7.5Cr-75Mo
Beryllium
N
N
145
550
690
1040
320
900
530
670
21
80
100
151
46
130
77
97
990
1170
1540
475
760
143
169
233
69
110
505
600
1030
1240
725
73
87
150
180
105
N
N
0.22
0.10
0.16
0.36
0.54
0.49
0.26
0.37
Reference
Ludwigson (1971)
Partridge (1972 unpublished)
Hopkins (1962)
Ludwigson (1971)
Low (1949)
Hopkins (1962)
Low and Garafalo (1947)
Drobnjak and Parr (1970)
::::
::::
)Holden et al(1957)
0.21
Maloof (1959)
Where more than one slope is observed in log-log plots, K and n values for the highstrain range are quoted. Further compilations of data for metals and alloys are given by
Datsko (1966), and for titanium alloys by Holden et a1 (1956).
Equation (2)
. , describes the true-stress/true-strain curves of many ferrous and nonferrous metals and alloys (table l), and the constants n and K are used widely to assess
behaviour in both uniaxial tension and compression tests at room temperature (Biihler
and Wagener 1965, 1967, Datsko 1966, Fitzpatrick 1968) and at elevated temperatures
(Biihler and Wagener 1965, 1967, Drobjnak and Parr 1970, Lee 1970, Sellars and Tegart
1972). The constants have also been used to relate the tensile properties to behaviour
in fatigue (Challenger and Moteff 1972, Hickerson and Hertzberg 1972, Krafft 1965,
97 1
Rowe 1966, Schwalbe and Macherauch 1971, Schwalbe 1973), fracture toughness (Hahn
and Rosenfield 1968, Krafft 1964, Peel and Forsyth 1973), creep (Schmidt and Dietrich
1972, Schmidt and von den Steinen 1972), hardness (Cahoon 1972), ductile fracture
(McLintock 1968) and metal forming (eg Dillamore 1974, Green et al 1971, Hughes and
Page 1971, Kashar 1967, Levy 1970, Painter and Pearce 1974, Rowe and Wolstencroft
1970).
Some of the limitations of the power-law strain-hardening equation when applied
to real materials are discussed by Wilson in a companion paper (Wilson 1974). The
present paper is concerned with the theoretical relationships to be expected between
n and K and conventional strain-hardening parameters. This aspect has not been made
clear in previous analyses of true-stress/true-strain curves (Fusfeld 1949, Kostron 1951,
Nelson and Winlock 1949, Panknin and Shawki 1961).
6ool
=0.2
0. I
0.2
0 :3
True plastic strain cp
0.4
0.5
In figure 1 the stress levels and slopes of the curves are directly proportional to K, as
are all stress terms. However, increasing n from 0.1 to 0.5, at constant K, has little
effect on either the true tensile strength or the strain-hardening rate at strains cP 2 0.1.
These idealized curves will now be examined in more detail.
The effect of n and K on the stress at 0.2% plastic strain (yield stress or 0.2% proof
stress) and on the true tensile strength is summarized in figure 2; with increasing n there
972
is a rapid decrease in the 0.2% proof stress, but very little change in the true tensile
strength. Note that the nominal tensile strength ut shows a greater dependence on n than
the true tensile strength, since ut=umax exp (- ep) (Dieter 1961); thus for n=0.5, ut is
-40 % lower than umilx in figure 2. Nominal tensile stress/strain data can be very misleading and are not considered further in this paper.
__
""[
Tensile strength
A K-1723 MN in-2 (250 k i i )
o K - I 0 3 4 M N m ' * ( l 5 0 ksi)
.K -551 M N m-2 (80 ksi)
zoo0
A.
- d----A
4-
--+--A--
G---4--+-4
t-
-.-
-4
100 1
01
02
03
04
05
Straiii-h?rderlng e x p n e r t n
omaxand
proof stress.
973
Strain-hardening exponent n
Figure 4. Effect on the strain-hardening parameters du/dep, ncrmax, nK and PS/TS ratio
of changes in n up to 0.5 and for two K values, 1034 and 551 MN m-2. Intermediate
K values can be estimated within the shaded region.
For constant K and changing n, a maximum occurs in the curve of da/dep and n a m a x is
nonlinear (figure 4). This figure also shows that the PS/TS ratio is independent of K,
whereas it is very sensitive to changes in n.
It can be concluded that when n is changing, the PS/TS ratio best reflects the strainhardening rate at 0.2% strain, provided n is in the range 0.2-0.5. The strain-hardening
974
rate can only be related to the products nK and numax at low n values ( < Oal), and then
only very approximately. At these low n values, or at high plastic strains, the PS/TS
ratio does not reflect the changes in the strain-hardening rate.
The relationship between nK and du/dq, is illustrated in figure 5 for selected values
of n and K. A peak in the du/dep curve is again apparent at n values similar to those
found previously in figure 4; the peak is most marked at low strains (ep < 0.01). Note
that identical nK values can be associated with quite different strain-hardening rates and
PS/TS ratios.
Strength coefficient K (MN ni2)
500
1000
1
1500
I
0.8
0.6
.
bm
0.4
'
0.2
C
0.5
0
0.3
0.2
Strain- hardening exponent n
0.4
0,I
3. Discussion
The present theoretical analysis of true-stress/true-strain curves that fit equation (2)
has shown that whereas the conventional strength and strain-hardening parameters are
all directly proportional to the constant K, the relationships between n and these parameters are more difficult to visualize. This has led to confusion when dealing with real
materials. For example, Gensamer (1946) reported that smaller n values indicated a lower
rate of strain-hardening in steels. Since then many workers have equated n to strainhardening rate (Cairns et al 1970, Coleman and Hardie 1966, Davies et aZ 1970, Kleemola 1970, 1971, Liu et aZl971, Stephenson and Oren 1970) in spite of cautionary words
975
400 -
(E
5
-E 300 0
"b
I
g/n'
"
b
Changing n
200-
0
"
b
bo
b
100-
01
02
Stra in-hardeni
03
no exponent
04
09
re-emphasized in recent texts (Reed-Hill 1972, Tegart 1967). It is clear from the theoretical curves in figure 4 that, for strains eP < 0.01, n changes in the same sense as da/dep
when n < 0.2 but in the opposite sense when n > 0.2.
Two different slopes are frequently found when tensile stress/strain data are plotted
on log-log coordinates. Two n values are quoted for such materials (Stephenson and
Oren 1970), although it is not easy to relate the transition in the log-log plot to any
change in strain-hardening behaviour (Bergstrom and Aronsson 1972). Strain-hardening
rates have also been determined from equation (4) by extrapolating the experimental
stress/strain curve backwards into the Liider's strain region (Place and Lund 1972).
This extrapolation or the use of n values obtained from curves exhibiting 'double-n'
behaviour render any analyses based on strain hardening of doubtful value.
In steels deformed at high temperatures, the product nK has been taken as an index
of the strain-hardening rate (Drobnjak and Parr 1970). The n values increased from
0.38 to 0.48 when K increased from 745 MN m-2 (108 ksi) to 1200 MN m-2 (174 ksi).
From the theoretical curves of figures 4 and 6 it is clear that, in practice, increasing n
in this range implies decreasing strain hardening (ep < 0.1) or negligible strain hardening
(cp > Oel), and not increasing strain hardening as concluded by the authors. The change
in K, however, implies a large increase in both the rate and magnitude of strain hardening.
The authors also interpret constant nK as meaning constant strain hardening; this is not
necessarily true, as shown by the theoretical curves in figure 5. Hence the significance
of the nK values obtained by these authors (Drobnjak and Parr 1970), derived from a
part of the stress/strain curve, is not clear.
Two differentrelationships between n and yield stress (ay) have been reported(Dil1amore
et al 1972, Gensamer 1945, Rosenfield and Hahn 1966, Hollomon 1945, Low 1949),
976
both of which differ from the log ay against n form required by theory (figure 2). The
present theoretical results also show that, if all the factors affecting the yield stress are
to be taken into account, it is necessary to identify the contributions due to K and n
as in figure 2.
Since the theoretical PS/TS ratio is independent of K (figure 4), this ratio is determined
uniquely by the n value (Datsko 1966). Experimental data reported by Pearce (1963),
although subject to scatter, embrace the values shown in figure 4. However, much
higher experimental values of the ratio were found by Kleemola (1970, 1971) for similar
n values in some Cu-Ni low-alloy steels. Again, this may be associated with the doublen behaviour of this material. Theoretically the ratio does not indicate the change in
strain-hardening rate due to changes in K (figure 4), but may be used as a rough guide
when n alone is varying, provided n > 0.2 and only strains less than 0.01 are considered.
Strain hardening given by A u has been used to compare the effects of test temperature
(Causey and Teghtsoonian 1970, Endo et al 1968, Garde et al 1972, Riseborough and
Teghtsoonian 1967, Russell and Jaffrey 1965, Santhanam and Reed-Hill 1970, 1971).
In some cases (Garde et a l 1972, Santhanam and Reed-Hill 1970, 1971) Ao has been
equated to do/dep. The present theoretical analysis has shown, however, that although
there may be conditions when changes in A U are in fairly close agreement with changes
in du/dep (for example, changes in AU= ~ 0 . 1 - 00.002 in figure 6 and da/dEp at ep =0+01
in figure 4), such an assumption can be very misleading.
4. Conclusions
977
Acknowledgments
The authors are indebted to Mr B Billing for programming the data required in this
paper. The paper is Crown Copyright, and is published by permission of the Comptroller,
HMSO.
References
Bergstrom Y and Aronsson B 1972 Metall. Trans. 3 1951-7
Buhler H and Wagener H W 1965 Bander BIeche Rohre 6 626-30 667-8, 677-84
__ 1967 Z . Metallk. 58 136-44
Cahoon J R 1972 Metall. Trans. 3 3040
Cairns J H , Clough J, Dewey M A P and Nutting J 1970 J . Inst. Metals 98 1-5
Causey A R and Teghtsoonian E 1970 Metall. Trans. 1 1177-83
Challenger K D and Moteff J 1972 Scripta Metall. 6 155-60
Coleman C E and Hardie D 1966J. Inst. Metals 94 387-91
Datsko J 1966 Material Properties and Manufacturing Processes (New York: Wiley)
Davies G J, Edington J W, Cutler C P and Padmanabhan K A 1970 J . Mater. Sci. 5 1091-102
Dieter G E (Jr) 1961 Mechanical Metallurgy (New York: McGraw-Hill)
Dillamore I L 1974 J. Phys. D : Appl. Phys. 7 979-91
Dillamore I L, Mella P and Hazel R J 1972 J. Inst. Metals 100 50-7
Drobnjak D J and Parr J G 1970 Metall. Trans. 1 759-65
Endo T, Enjyo T and Adachi M 1968 Trans. Japan Inst. Metals (Suppl.) 9 725-30
Fitzpatrick J M 1968 J . Mater. 3 977-82
Fusfeld H I 1949 J. appl. Phys. 20 1052-5
Garde AM, Santhanam A T and Reed-Hill R E 1972 Acta MetaN. 20 215-20
Gensamer M 1946 Trans. Am. Soc. Metals 36 30-60
Green S J, Langan J J, Leasia J D and Yang W H 1971 Metall. Trans. 2 1813-20
Hahn G T and Rosenfield A R 1968 ASTM Rep. No. STP 432, pp 5-32
Haynes R and Maddocks P J 1969 Metal Sci. J . 3 190-5
Hickerson J R (Jr) and Hertzberg R W 1972 Metall. Trans. 3 179-89
Holden F C , Ogden H R and Jaffee R I 1953 Trans. Metall. Soc. AZME 5 238-42
-1957 ASTM Rep. No. STP 204, pp 14-31
Holden F C, Williams D N, Riley W E and Jaffee R I 1956 TML Rep. No. 30, Batelle Memorial Institute,
Columbus, Ohio, USA
Hollomon J H 1945 Trans. Metall. Soc. AZME 162 268-90
Hopkins A D 1962 Metal Treatment 29 413-20
Hughes I F and Page E W 1971 Metall. Trans. 2 2067-75
Kashar L J 1967 Trans. MefaN. Soc. AZME 239 1461-8
Kleemola H J 1970 J. Iron Steel Inst. 208 1025-8
-1971 Jernkont. Annlr 155 581-93
Kostron H 1951 Arch. EisenhiittWes. 22 317-25
Krafft J M 1964 Appl. Mater. Res. 3 88-101
-1965 Trans. Am. Soc. Metals 58 691-5
Lee D 1970 Metall. Trans. 1 1607-16
Levy B S 1970 Sheet Metal Znd. 47 527-30
Liu CT, Armstrong R W and Gurland J 1971 J . Iron Steel Inst. 209 142-6
Low J R 1949 Properties of Engineering Materials (Cleveland: ASM) pp 17-59
Low J R and Garafalo F 1947 Proc. Soc. Expl Stress Anal. 4 16-24
Ludwigson D C 1971 Metall. Trans. 2 2825-8
McLintock F A 1968 J . appl. Mech. (Trans. ASME) 35 363-71
Maloof S R 1959 Trans. Metall. Soc. AZME 215 872-3
Marin J 1962 Mechanical Behaviour of Engineering Materials (New York: Prentice-Hall)
Marin J and Sharma M G 1958 Welding J . Res. (Suppl.) 37 375s-8s
Nelson P G and Winlock J 1949 ASTM Bull. (January) 53-5
Ogden H R, Maykuth D J, Finlay W L and Jaffee R I 1953 Trans. Metall. Soc. AIME 5 267-72
77
978