Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Subcortical Epilepsy?: Views & Reviews
Subcortical Epilepsy?: Views & Reviews
Subcortical Epilepsy?: Views & Reviews
Correspondence to
Dr. Badawy:
badawyr@unimelb.edu.au
Subcortical epilepsy?
ABSTRACT
In the past, the cortex has for the most part been considered to be the site of seizure origin in the
different forms of epilepsy. Findings from histopathologic, electrophysiologic, and brain imaging
studies now provide ample evidence demonstrating that like normal cerebral function, epileptic
seizures involve widespread network interactions between cortical and subcortical structures.
These studies show that different forms of generalized and focal epileptiform discharges and
seizures engage various subcortical structures in varying ways. This interaction has been the subject of many reviews and is not the focus of the current work. The aim of this review is to examine
the evidence suggesting the possibility for some of the subcortical structures to initiate seizures
independently and the clinical implications of this. Neurology 2013;80:19011907
GLOSSARY
DBS 5 deep brain stimulation; GSW 5 generalized spike-wave discharges; VNS 5 vagus nerve stimulation.
In the late 19th century, Hughlings Jackson proposed his concept on the origins of epilepsy.1 In
his proposal, he regarded epileptic seizures as being due to a neuronal discharge. This moved the
site of origin of epileptic seizures to the cerebral cortex, included focal seizures as part of the
epilepsy spectrum, and discarded the idea of epilepsy being due to a peripheral reflex mechanism. For a long time after that, epilepsy was considered to be mostly cortical in origin, with
little attention to other structures. Even with the development of the centrencephalic concept
proposed by Penfield and Jasper2 in 1954, which drew attention to the complex integration of
several systems (including the thalamus and brainstem) for the facilitation and spread of epileptic
activity, a cortical basis for epilepsy remained the predominant theme. This was mainly due to
the controversy about the relative importance of subcortical structures in animal and human
literature. The last few decades have changed this and there is now ample animal and human
neuropathologic, imaging, and electrophysiologic evidence to suggest a more complex cortical
subcortical interaction as the basis of the epileptic process.3 It is also plausible that any lesion
with inherently epileptogenic neurons anywhere in the CNS might produce epileptic seizures if
functional connections are retained. The purpose of the present review is to examine the evidence supporting a subcortical role in the initiation of seizures. It is not our intention to
de-emphasize the role of the cortex. We mainly aim to consider the evidence suggesting the
possibility of subcortical epilepsy as a clinical entity.
SUBCORTICAL EPILEPSY: A CLINICAL ENTITY? Thalamus.
Supplemental data at
www.neurology.org
Evidence supporting 3 Hz spike-and-wave seizure initiation in the thalamus has been suggested in early human intracranial recordings2,4,5 and it is welldocumented (based on animal models of absence epilepsy) that cortex and thalamus as well as their connecting
pathways (figure 1) are necessary for generating generalized spike-wave discharges (GSW) and typical absence
seizures.68 Networks that involve the thalamic reticular nucleus and T-currents of the thalamic relay cells are
similar to those thought to be responsible for generating sleep spindles,9 which involves a complex interaction
of excitatory and inhibitory firing of thalamic reticular, thalamic relay, and neocortical pyramidal neurons. A
disturbance within this interaction is thought to result in the generation of the rhythmic burst firing underlying
From the Department of Clinical Neurosciences (R.A.B.B., S.J.V., M.J.C.), St Vincents Hospital, Sydney; Departments of Medicine (R.A.B.B.,
S.J.V., M.J.C.) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (R.A.B.B.), The University of Melbourne, Melbourne; and Bionics Institute (A.L.B.E.),
East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Go to Neurology.org for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.
2013 American Academy of Neurology
1901
"NFSJDBO"DBEFNZPG/FVSPMPHZ6OBVUIPSJ[FESFQSPEVDUJPOPGUIJTBSUJDMFJTQSPIJCJUFE
Figure 1
Thalamocortical circuits
Neurology 80
"NFSJDBO"DBEFNZPG/FVSPMPHZ6OBVUIPSJ[FESFQSPEVDUJPOPGUIJTBSUJDMFJTQSPIJCJUFE
Figure 2
Examples of scalp and intracranial EEG abnormalities that may be seen with epilepsy arising from the different subcortical structures based on case reports.
1903
"NFSJDBO"DBEFNZPG/FVSPMPHZ6OBVUIPSJ[FESFQSPEVDUJPOPGUIJTBSUJDMFJTQSPIJCJUFE
Neurology 80
"NFSJDBO"DBEFNZPG/FVSPMPHZ6OBVUIPSJ[FESFQSPEVDUJPOPGUIJTBSUJDMFJTQSPIJCJUFE
brainstem in seizure initiation; however, there is a suggested involvement in infantile spasms. This is supported by evidence of brainstem activation on PETe7
and abnormal brainstem evoked potentials and brainstem atrophy on MRIe8 in some of these patients. There
is also evidence of decreased numbers of brainstem
catecholaminergic neurons on immunohistochemical
experiments.e9 However, these findings are not seen
in all patients. Thus it remains difficult to determine
whether this is related to the etiology of infantile spasms
or a consequence of multiple seizures.
THERAPEUTIC APPLICATIONS Targeting subcortical structures is increasingly being used in patients with
refractory epilepsy in the hope of achieving seizure control. Left cervical vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is now
a well-established tool for treatment of medically refractory epilepsy.e10 The mechanism by which VNS reduces seizure frequency is unknown, though some
animal evidence points to the thalamus and other diencephalic structures as critical elements.e11 Vagal afferents indirectly project to a variety of brainstem nuclei
including medullary reticular formatione12 and the
thalamus.e13 PETe14,e15 and SPECTe16,e17 studies
have revealed thalamic blood flow changes during
acute VNS in patients with intractable epilepsy.
However, the small number of studies that have
examined thalamic blood flow during VNS yielded
conflicting results regarding the direction and magnitude of change. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has
been promoted as a possible therapy for epilepsy for
more than 30 years and now is moving to the point
of clinical utility.e18 The proposed hypothesis is that
DBS leads to disruption at the level of individual
neurons, synapses (in the form of increased inhibitory or decreased excitatory potentials), and neuronal
networks.e19 Network effects rely significantly on
stimulation parameters and may ultimately result in
either excitation or inhibition at sites remote from the
local region of stimulation. The results of clinical trials
are promisinge18; however, more studies are needed to
identify which target, parameters, and stimulation
strategies result in the most efficacious mode for seizure control.
DISCUSSION A wide range of interictal and ictal animal and human studies demonstrate a critical role for
subcortical structures in epilepsy. There is little doubt
that the thalamus is very important in modulation and
propagation of many forms of generalized and focal
epileptic activity and seizures. In addition, there is
some suggestion it can actually initiate seizures and
may masquerade as atypical or refractory epilepsy.
The basal ganglia and cerebellum also seem to play
an important role in the generation and propagation
Neurology 80
1905
"NFSJDBO"DBEFNZPG/FVSPMPHZ6OBVUIPSJ[FESFQSPEVDUJPOPGUIJTBSUJDMFJTQSPIJCJUFE
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The authors thank Dr. Fatema Abdulla and Professor Neelan Pillay for
sparking interest in the subject and helping with the literature review,
Dr. Danny Flanagan for helping to formulate the scope and structure of
the manuscript, and Professor Graeme Jackson for providing the motivation to pursue it.
STUDY FUNDING
17.
18.
19.
DISCLOSURE
R. Badawy, A. Lai, and S. Vogrin report no disclosures. M. Cook
received funding for a conference trip from SciGen (2011) and received
speaker honoraria and travel reimbursements from UCB Pharma (2011
and 2012), Sanofi (2011 and 2012), and SciGen (2012). Go to
Neurology.org for full disclosures.
20.
21.
REFERENCES
1. Jackson J. The lumleian lectures on convulsive seizures.
BMJ 1890;i:703, 765, 821.
2. Penfield W, Jasper HH. Epilepsy and the Functional Anatomy of the Human Brain. Boston: Little, Brown; 1954.
3. Norden AD, Blumenfeld H. The role of subcortical structures in human epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav 2002;3:219231.
4. Williams D. A study of thalamic and cortical rhythms in
petit mal. Brain 1953;76:5069.
5. Spiegel EA, Wycis HT, Reyes V. Diencephalic mechanisms in petit mal epilepsy. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1951;3:473475.
6. Gloor P. Generalized epilepsy with bilateral synchronous
spike and wave discharge: new findings concerning its
physiological mechanisms. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl 1978:34:245249.
7. Danober L, Deransart C, Depaulis A, Vergnes M,
Marescaux C. Pathophysiological mechanisms of genetic
absence epilepsy in the rat. Prog Neurobiol 1998;55:2757.
1906
Neurology 80
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
"NFSJDBO"DBEFNZPG/FVSPMPHZ6OBVUIPSJ[FESFQSPEVDUJPOPGUIJTBSUJDMFJTQSPIJCJUFE
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.
53.
54.
55.
56.
57.
58.
59.
60.
Neurology 80
1907
"NFSJDBO"DBEFNZPG/FVSPMPHZ6OBVUIPSJ[FESFQSPEVDUJPOPGUIJTBSUJDMFJTQSPIJCJUFE