Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Delay Analysis Method

    Uploaded by

    Muhammad Amir
    207 views4 pages
    The document compares different methods for analyzing schedule delays on a construction project: 1) As Planned vs As Built Comparison simply compares the planned schedule to the actual/as built schedule to determine total delay days but provides no information on specific delay causes. 2) Impacted as Planned Method uses the planned schedule as a baseline and adds identified owner or contractor delays to determine delays caused by each party but is subjective and assumes the planned logic is valid. 3) Collapsed (But For) As Built Method uses the actual as built schedule as the baseline and removes identified owner or contractor delays to show the schedule impact of each party's delays while providing the most accurate analysis but does not account for mitigation of

    Original Description:

    Pobondo pon aku tak tahu lah weh

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document compares different methods for analyzing schedule delays on a construction project: 1) As Planned vs As Built Comparison simply compares the planned schedule to the actual/as built schedule to determine total delay days but provides no information on specific delay causes. 2) Impacted as Planned Method uses the planned schedule as a baseline and adds identified owner or contractor delays to determine delays caused by each party but is subjective and assumes the planned logic is valid. 3) Collapsed (But For) As Built Method uses the actual as built schedule as the baseline and removes identified owner or contractor delays to show the schedule impact of each party's delays while providing the most accurate analysis but does not account for mitigation of

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    207 views4 pages

    Delay Analysis Method

    Uploaded by

    Muhammad Amir
    The document compares different methods for analyzing schedule delays on a construction project: 1) As Planned vs As Built Comparison simply compares the planned schedule to the actual/as built schedule to determine total delay days but provides no information on specific delay causes. 2) Impacted as Planned Method uses the planned schedule as a baseline and adds identified owner or contractor delays to determine delays caused by each party but is subjective and assumes the planned logic is valid. 3) Collapsed (But For) As Built Method uses the actual as built schedule as the baseline and removes identified owner or contractor delays to show the schedule impact of each party's delays while providing the most accurate analysis but does not account for mitigation of

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 4

    As Planned vs As Built Comparison

    As Planned Schedule:
    o Detailed Critical Path Method schedule; or
    o Bar chart schedule; or
    o Narrative schedule
    As Built Schedule:
    o Final as-built CPM schedule with periodic updates; and
    o Project daily reports;
    o Meeting minutes;
    o Inspection reports by the designer, owner, building
    inspector
    o Correspondence
    o Memos to file
    Benefits:
    Simple to Prepare: 168 actual days 112 planned days = 56
    delay days
    Shortcomings:
    No information on particular delay events;
    Similar to Total Cost approach
    Impacted as Planned Method
    Begin with As Planned Schedule
    Add Owner or Contractor Delays
    Compute Owner caused delay and Contractor caused delay
    Benefits:
    Relatively simple to implement
    Allows for mitigation of delays
    Shortcomings:
    Highly subjective
    Assumes as-planned (baseline) logic holds.
    Collapsed (But For) As Built Method
    Begin with As Built Schedule, including;
    Owner and Contractor Delays.
    Remove Owner (Contractor) caused delays.
    Resulting schedule shows when Contractor (Owner) would
    have finished but for Owner (Contractor) delays.
    Benefits:
    Very good accuracy
    Shortcomings:

    No allowance for mitigation of delays

    Comparison of Results
    Method

    Non
    Excusable

    As Planned vs As Built Comparison


    Impacted as Planned (Owner Delays)
    Impacted as Planned (Contractor
    Delays)
    Collapsed (But for) As-Built

    Delay
    Excusable
    Non
    compensable

    Excusable
    Compensabl
    e

    Comparison of Results
    Comparison
    Method

    Accuracy/

    Effort/Co
    st

    Data

    Effectivene
    Require
    Required
    ss
    d
    As Planned vs As
    Built Comparison
    Impacted as Planned
    (Owner Delays)
    Impacted as Planned
    (Contractor Delays)
    Collapsed (But for)
    As-Built

    You might also like