Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 14 views

    Edi X12 Vs Un/Edifact: The Table Below Highlights The Difference Between The EDI X12 Standard and EDIFACT Standard

    Uploaded by

    jaspreet1989
    The document compares the EDI X12 and EDIFACT standards. EDI X12 is mostly used in North America while EDIFACT is mostly used in Europe and Asia. The two standards differ in their use of transactions sets/messages, terminologies, separators, composite elements, acknowledgments, binary support, and security features.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Edi X12 Vs Un/Edifact: The Table Below Highlights The Difference Between The EDI X12 Standard and EDIFACT Standard

    Uploaded by

    jaspreet1989
    14 views2 pages
    The document compares the EDI X12 and EDIFACT standards. EDI X12 is mostly used in North America while EDIFACT is mostly used in Europe and Asia. The two standards differ in their use of transactions sets/messages, terminologies, separators, composite elements, acknowledgments, binary support, and security features.

    Original Description:

    j

    Original Title

    j

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document compares the EDI X12 and EDIFACT standards. EDI X12 is mostly used in North America while EDIFACT is mostly used in Europe and Asia. The two standards differ in their use of transactions sets/messages, terminologies, separators, composite elements, acknowledgments, binary support, and security features.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    14 views2 pages

    Edi X12 Vs Un/Edifact: The Table Below Highlights The Difference Between The EDI X12 Standard and EDIFACT Standard

    Uploaded by

    jaspreet1989
    The document compares the EDI X12 and EDIFACT standards. EDI X12 is mostly used in North America while EDIFACT is mostly used in Europe and Asia. The two standards differ in their use of transactions sets/messages, terminologies, separators, composite elements, acknowledgments, binary support, and security features.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    EDI X12 vs UN/EDIFACT

    The table below highlights the difference between the EDI X12
    standard and EDIFACT standard.
    Topic

    ANSI X12

    UN/EDIFACT

    Application

    Mostly used in
    North America

    Mostly used in Europe and Asia

    Transaction Sets Messages


    Terminologies Equivalence

    Loops

    Groups

    Terminators

    Separators

    Interchange
    Header/Trailer Segments

    ISA/IEA

    UNB/UNZ

    Group
    Header/Trailer Segments

    GS/GE

    UNG/UNE (optional)

    Transaction Set, (Message)


    Header/Trailer

    ST/SE

    UNH/UNT

    Separators Specification
    Segment

    None

    UNA (optional)

    Segment

    '

    Element

    Composit
    e

    >

    Release Indicator

    Not supported

    Supported

    Composite Elements

    Rarely used

    Commonly Used

    Acknowledgment

    TA1 and 997

    CONTRL

    Binary support

    BIN, BDS
    segments

    ISO 9735-8 - Associated data in EDI

    Commonly used
    Terminators,
    (Separators)

    Security

    ASC X12.58 Security


    Structures

    - ISO 9735-5 - Security rules for


    batch EDI (authenticity, integrity
    and non-repudiation of origin)
    - ISO 9735-6 - Secure
    authentication and
    acknowledgement message
    (message type - AUTACK)
    - ISO 9735-7 - Security rules for
    batch EDI (confidentiality)
    - ISO 9735-9 - Security key and
    certificate management message
    (message type - KEYMAN)

    You might also like