Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 17

SPE 170812

Ensuring The Safety Of Onsite Personnel And


Neighboring Community During Workover And Welltesting Activities With A High H2S Risk Potential - A Case
Study
Hughes Warwick Stanley, OMV Petrom; Andrea Ferrante and Elie Daher, United Safety

Slide 2

The Challenge of Sour Gas


Hydrogen sulfide attacks the respiratory and CNS
of the victim resulting in death at around 1000 ppm.

Slightly heavier than air. Communities situated


downwind are at high risk.
Ensure the safety of personnel and neighboring
community by following industry standards.

SPE 170812 Ensuring The Safety Of Onsite Personnel And Neighboring Community During
Workover And Well-testing Activities With A High H2S Risk Potential - A Case Study
Hughes Warwick Stanely, Andrea Ferrante and Elie Daher

Slide 3

The Site
Found 8% H2S and 24%
CO2

Located 250 meters away


from nearby village
Population: approximately
4,500
A failure or gas release
could have severe
consequences.

Google map of 20 Adjud Exploration Well

SPE 170812 Ensuring The Safety Of Onsite Personnel And Neighboring Community During
Workover And Well-testing Activities With A High H2S Risk Potential - A Case Study
Hughes Warwick Stanely, Andrea Ferrante and Elie Daher

Slide 4

Solution
Prevent exposure by:
Regular monitoring to
ensure no pressure build up
in the annulus or tubing.
Develop a site-specific
Emergency Response Plan
(ERP) and define
Emergency Planning Zone.
Conduct extensive H2S training.
Demonstrate competence through onsite and offsite drills.
Win support and confidence of local stakeholders.
SPE 170812 Ensuring The Safety Of Onsite Personnel And Neighboring Community During
Workover And Well-testing Activities With A High H2S Risk Potential - A Case Study
Hughes Warwick Stanely, Andrea Ferrante and Elie Daher

Slide 5

Solution: Planning Phase


September 2012
Review of 20 Adjud
project and initial
HAZID and Needs
assessment.

November 2012
Definition of
vocational training
needs, gap analysis
and breathing air
equipment needs
assessment.

October 2012
First draft for site
and public
protection Gas
Detection Layout to
be reviewed upon
EPZ availability.

January 2013
Operator full HAZID
exercise involving
partners, contactors
and subcontractors.

December 2012
Monitoring Wind
Speed and
Direction.

March 2013
Safety company
conducts intensive
H2S/ERP training
campaign prior to
start of project.

February 2013
Finalize EPZ and
ERP, customization
of H2S detection
and protection
measures.

SPE 170812 Ensuring The Safety Of Onsite Personnel And Neighboring Community During
Workover And Well-testing Activities With A High H2S Risk Potential - A Case Study
Hughes Warwick Stanely, Andrea Ferrante and Elie Daher

Slide 6

Solution: Identifying the EPZ and EAZ


Emergency Planning Zone
Emergency Awareness Zone

EAZ (600 meters)

Nearest
Village

To town 2 Km.

To village 1 Km.

Slide 7

Solution: Wind Direction Study

Wind speed and direction data


as component for dispersion
models
Wind data was considered in
locating briefing (muster) areas.
Two areas were selected as safe
briefing (muster) areas.

Conducted four months of monitoring to make statistically


valid conclusions.
SPE 170812 Ensuring The Safety Of Onsite Personnel And Neighboring Community During
Workover And Well-testing Activities With A High H2S Risk Potential - A Case Study
Hughes Warwick Stanely, Andrea Ferrante and Elie Daher

Slide 8

Solution: Monitoring and Detection Equipment


Fixed H2S monitoring and detection
system
Audible and visual warning alarms
Emergency battery power back-up

Multi-gas detector
Measure atmospheric concentrations up
to 300 ppm

H2S and SO2 Monitor

Placed close to the houses and village


area

Personal H2S monitors for all personnel


SPE 170812 Ensuring The Safety Of Onsite Personnel And Neighboring Community During
Workover And Well-testing Activities With A High H2S Risk Potential - A Case Study
Hughes Warwick Stanely, Andrea Ferrante and Elie Daher

Slide 9

Solution: Warning and Alarm Systems


Location of H2S warning alarms, audible and visual:
Drillers console (audible and light)
Engine's area (audible and light)
Mud pit area (audible and light)
Living quarters (audible at all levels)
Main office of the rig (audible and light)
Shale shakers area (audible and light)

Wellsite perimeter fence alarm sirens


112 dB with three activation buttons
Manually activated by the Well Services Supervisor
SPE 170812 Ensuring The Safety Of Onsite Personnel And Neighboring Community During
Workover And Well-testing Activities With A High H2S Risk Potential - A Case Study
Hughes Warwick Stanely, Andrea Ferrante and Elie Daher

Slide 10

Solution: Proper Training


H2S Awareness &
Emergency Response
Training of personnel and
local firefighting brigade

Proper equipment
maintenance
Community outreach and
education

Date of
Training
March
2011
April
2013
May
2013

Venue/
Location
20 Adjud
Well
20 Adjud
Well
20 Adjud
Well

Total No. of Participants

No. of
Participants
161

227
37
425

SPE 170812 Ensuring The Safety Of Onsite Personnel And Neighboring Community During
Workover And Well-testing Activities With A High H2S Risk Potential - A Case Study
Hughes Warwick Stanely, Andrea Ferrante and Elie Daher

Slide 11

Solution: Offsite and Onsite Drills


One drill every three days.
Emergency H2S drills conducted prior
to entry into a known, unknown or
suspected H2S zone.
Prior to special operations such as
venting, wireline, coiled tubing, and
well-testing operations.
20 emergency H2S muster, man
down and evacuation drills
conducted while testing.

Drills
Emergency muster
Use of Self-Contained
Breathing Apparatus
(SCBA)
Use of cascade system
Rescue procedure
Emergency evacuation
procedures

SPE 170812 Ensuring The Safety Of Onsite Personnel And Neighboring Community During
Workover And Well-testing Activities With A High H2S Risk Potential - A Case Study
Hughes Warwick Stanely, Andrea Ferrante and Elie Daher

Slide 12

Emergency Levels and Response Strategies


Category 1
Low alarm condition
10ppm H2S and/or
2ppm SO2
Stop work,
investigate alarm
Report incident and
remedy
Return to work

Category 2
High alarm condition or
danger to life condition at
the rig site
20ppm H2S and/or
5ppm SO2
Stop work, investigate
alarm
Remedy if possible
Return to work
Evacuate well site if
necessary
Shut in well if
necessary
Stop flaring if
necessary
Ignite rig if necessary

Category 3
High alarm, danger
outside rig site
20ppm H2S and/or
5ppm SO2
Stop work and
investigate alarm
Remedy if possible
Return to work
Evacuate well site if
necessary
Shut in well if
necessary
Stop flaring if
necessary
Ignite rig if
necessary
Evacuate village as
necessary

Slide 13

Emergency Response Guideline


Level 1
Evaluation
Criteria
Within
Monitoring
Zone
Evaluation
Criteria
Within
Monitoring
Zone
Isolation

Personnel
H2S / SO2
Monitoring
Observation
Post
Entry Control
Point

Level 2

Level 3

1ppm H2S

2 9 ppm H2S

10 ppm H2S

Alert mode and monitor


concentrations.

Monitor concentrations and


request to Shelter-in-Place.

Immediate evacuation must


take place.

1ppm SO2

2 ppm SO2

5 ppm SO2

Advise public to evacuate


area on a voluntary basis.

Evacuation of the area should Evacuation is mandatory.


begin.

Roadblock set up at site


security checkpoint.

Roadblocks set up based on


wind direction within EPZ or
at outer edge.

Roadblocks set up based on


wind direction at outer
perimeter of the EPZ. May
expand into the EAZ.
Only authorized personnel Authorized personnel within
Authorized personnel within
on site.
affected area.
EPZ.
Within the well location, set Within the well location, set up mobile monitor based on wind
up mobile monitor around
conditions and direction between wellsite and public.
wellsite.
Determine outer perimeter of plume.
Personnel requested to be mobile. Follow evacuation routes
Alert Standby
and remain in contact with H2S Safety personnel to
determine the extent of zone expansion.
Alert Standby

Slide 14

Results: Active Role of Community


Engaged local mayors office
Voluntary

evacuation at Level 1 for special needs residents


Mandatory evacuation at Level 2
Provide Shelter Reception Center

Engaged ISU Vranca


Produced

an ISU intervention plan.


Informs public in the Emergency Awareness Zone
Evacuation starts with closest communities/situated downwind.

Win support of local community


Offsite

drills showed competence in emergency response.


Evacuation as primary protection measure.
Well-testing and workover operations ran smoothly.
SPE 170812 Ensuring The Safety Of Onsite Personnel And Neighboring Community During
Workover And Well-testing Activities With A High H2S Risk Potential - A Case Study
Hughes Warwick Stanely, Andrea Ferrante and Elie Daher

Slide 15

Conclusion
Value of continuous personnel training
Continuous improvement improves workforce efficiency reducing
operating costs through lesser incidents and productivity losses.

Increased public confidence in operator


Practice transparency. Communicate risks involved in operations.
Emergency drills showed competence to respond appropriately in
case of emergencies.

Setting a new benchmark for safety in the region


Establish a working relationship with a dedicated safety solutions
provider to lead the safety program implementation and improve
the reputation and overall sustainability of the Oil and Gas
industry.
SPE 170812 Ensuring The Safety Of Onsite Personnel And Neighboring Community During
Workover And Well-testing Activities With A High H2S Risk Potential - A Case Study
Hughes Warwick Stanely, Andrea Ferrante and Elie Daher

Slide 16

Works Cited
American Petroleum Institute. API Recommended Practices 49 Recommended Practice for Drilling and Well Servicing
Operations Involving Hydrogen Sulfide. Washington, D.C.: API, 2001.
American Petroleum Institute. API Recommended Practices 55 Recommended Practice for Oil and Gas Producing and Gas
Processing Plant Operations Involving Hydrogen Sulfide. Washington, D.C.: API, 2005.
American Petroleum Institute. API Recommended Practices 68 on Oil and Gas Well Servicing and Workover Operations
Involving Hydrogen Sulphide. Washington, D.C.: API, 1998.
ECD. Commission Directive 2009/161/EU of 17 December 2009. Official Journal of the European Union: L 338,
87-89. 2009. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32009L0161&from=ENlex.europa.eucontent/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32009L0161&fro
m=EN (accessed March 31, 2014).
Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Oil and Gas Well Drilling and Servicing eTool: General Safety and Health
Hydrogen Sulfide Gas. https://www.osha.gov/SLTC/etools/oilandgas/general_safety/h2s_monitoring.html_br (accessed
March 7, 2014).
Pachiu L., Mustaciosu R., and Dudau R. Oil and gas regulation in Romania: Overview. Energy and Natural Resources MultiJurisdictional Guide (2014).
http://uk.practicallaw.com/cs/Satellite?blobcol=urldata&blobheader=application%2Fpdf&blobkey=id&blobtable=MungoBlobs&
blobwhere=1247833806217&ssbinary=true (accessed April 15, 2014).

Slide 17

Acknowledgements / Thank You / Questions


Warwick Stanley Hughes
Senior Completions Engineer
OMV PETROM S. A.
Petrom City
4th Floor, B 500
No 22 Coralilor, Sector 1
Bucharest, Romania
Mob: 0040 (0) 732 820 202
Email: Hughes.Warwick@petrom.com

Andrea Ferrante
Business Development Manager
Servizi Integrati di Sicurezza S.r.l.
United Safety Int. Group
Via Mare Adriatico 72/E 65010
Spoltore (PE) Italy
Tel: +39 085 4971521
Fax: +39 085 4973121
Mob: +39 348 7071 906
Email: andrea.ferrante@sisworld.net

You might also like