Review Process Outcome

Title

REVIEW ASPECT

Paper Number

YES/
NO

DETAILED COMMENT

1. Does the title reflect the

contents of the paper?

Should capture the small to medium scale

aspect in Zimbabwe

2. Is the paper proof of latest

and relevant literature study?

The bulk of the references listed do not

appear in the body. Author to take note of
the recommended referencing style from
template.
Interesting design in appropriate
technology for farm mechanisation

3. Does the article make

original contribution to
scholarly debate in the field
of study?
4. Is the methodology clear and
adequate?
5. Are the results consistent
with the methodology?
6. Does the discussion of
results show insight and
originality?
7. Are the conclusions clear and
valid?

There is a gap between the results of the

survey on farmers and the product design

Refer to comments in document

8. Does the abstract adequately

and accurately summarise
the paper?
9. Does the paper conform to
the proficient and consistent
use of the English language?
10.Does the paper conform to
the MPSOM template?

The abstract is a good summary of the

paper

11.Any other recommendations?

PLEASE SEND FULL PAPER

Recommendation

Minor corrects refer to comments and

changes made to the document
The only areas that need attention are the
paragraphs andreferencing

Accept with Minor Corrections

Accept with Major Corrections
Accept for Presentation only
Rejected

Editor Decision

Accept

Reject