Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1809 Filed 09/16/16 Page 1 of 3

Richard K. Walker (SBN 004159)


WALKER & PESKIND, PLLC
16100 N. 71st Street, Suite 140
Scottsdale, Arizona 85254-2236
rkw@azlawpartner.com
Phone: 480/483-6336
Facsimile: 480/483-6337

Counsel for Defendant Maricopa County, Arizona

2
3
4

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

9
10

Manuel de Jesus Ortega Melendres, et al.,

11

CASE NO: 2:07-CV-02513-GMS


MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONAS
NOTICE OF APPEAL

Plaintiffs

12

And

13

United States of America,

14

Plaintiff-Intervenor,

15

vs.

16
17

Joseph. M. Arpaio, et. al.,


18

Defendants.
19

Notice is hereby given that MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA (the County),

20
21

Defendant in the above-named case, hereby appeals to the United States Court of Appeals

22
23

for the Ninth Circuit, pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1)(B)(i) of the Federal Rules of Appellate

24

Procedure, from the following Orders entered in this case: (1) the Second Supplemental

25

Permanent Injunction/Judgment Order entered on July 20, 2016 (Doc. 1748, attached

26

hereto

as

Exhibit

A);

(2)

the

Amended

27
28

Second

Supplemental

Permanent

Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1809 Filed 09/16/16 Page 2 of 3

Injunction/Judgment Order entered on July 22, 2016 (Doc. 1760, attached hereto as Exhibit

B); (3) the Second Amended Supplemental Permanent Injunction/Judgment Order

3
4

entered on July 26, 2016 (Doc. 1765, attached hereto as Exhibit C); and (4) all

interlocutory, non-final Orders subordinate to the foregoing. See Hall v. City of Los

Angeles, 697 F.3d 1059, 1070 (9th Cir. 2012); Bradshaw v. Zoological Socy of Sand

Diego, 662 F.2d 1301, 1304 (9th Cir. 1981). With respect to interlocutory, non-final Orders

8
9

in particular, the County appeals from, inter alia: (a) the Order re Victim Compensation

10

entered on August 19, 2016 (Doc. 1791, attached hereto as Exhibit D); (b) the Order

11

entered February 26, 2016 (Doc. 1630, attached hereto as Exhibit E); (c) the Order

12

entered May 5, 2015 (Doc. 1048, attached hereto as Exhibit F); and (d) the Order entered

13
14

May 8, 2015 (Doc. 1065, attached hereto as Exhibit G).

15
16

DATED: This 16th day of September, 2016.

17
18
19

WALKER & PESKIND, PLLC

20
21
22
23
24

By: /s/ Richard K. Walker


Richard K. Walker, Esquire
16100 N. 71st Street, Suite 140
Scottsdale, Arizona 85254-2236
Attorneys for Defendant Maricopa County,
Arizona

25
26
27
28

Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1809 Filed 09/16/16 Page 3 of 3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

1
2

I hereby certify that on September 16, 2016, I electronically filed Maricopa

County, Arizonas Notice of Appeal, with the Clerk of the Court for filing and uploading

4
5
6

to the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to all parties of record.
/s/ Michelle Giordano

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

You might also like