Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Econimia Solar
Econimia Solar
Developing Economies
Darick W. LaSelle, Robert Liechty,
Hassan Alzamzam; Robert Foster; Jasmin Dzabic; Nathan Clark
Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Colorado
Denver, CO, USA
Abstract Developing economies currently show more potential
benefit from renewable and off-grid technologies when
compared to first world countries like the United States. Basic
humanitarian needs like water pumping, water purification,
refrigeration for inoculations, cooking and heating without
depleting local resources can have a major impact on quality of
living. Once basic hygienic needs are accounted for, villages
and even small towns will have a more legitimate foothold to
develop out of an impoverished state. Unfortunately, the
majority of renewable solutions are complicated, and once
installed can easily fall into disrepair, with little or no local
knowledge base available to maintain complicated photovoltaic
(PV) or wind turbine systems. Additionally, the majority of
renewable energy systems require extensive manufacturing that
are not environmentally friendly. Once these systems are
manufactured, they are bulky and costly to ship. The system
described in this paper will have the ability to produce low cost
solar thermal energy, with a minimal of capital investment. The
system allows for the option to have the solar thermal collector
be built on site, requiring only a minimum of equipment to be
manufactured remotely and shipped. The proposed system will
allow for a much wider spread of renewable energy in
developing economies.
I. INTRODUCTION
The focal point of this dish sits at 0.125 m. Noting that the
height of this dish is 0.5 m, the focal point is significantly
inside of the dish. This method of heat collecting greatly
simplified the construction of the overall generator. Whereas
a separate structure would have to have been created to accept
the heat from the collector, this simply requires a hole to be
cut to insert the Stirling engine below the dish with only the
heat absorber sticking through into the dish, as shown in the
conceptual rendering in Figure 4.
will lead to a central hot spot. This makes the heating of the
fluid inhomogeneous, which leads to more loss. This
configuration will allow a more evenly distributed heat
conduction through the absorber. Additionally, once the
cylinder reaches operating temperature, it will have a higher
surface area to volume ratio, which increases the rate of
convection.
More to the point of providing a sustainable solution to
remote villages, the Stirling engine selected for this project is
a very simple device. It is made of mostly black iron, and
notably requires no silicon based manufacturing, which
eliminates a significant environmentally harmful waste
product when compared to the manufacturing of PV Panels.
While the Stirling engine CSP method is not the most
popular method of generating energy from solar insolation, it
is gaining traction due to its more environmentally friendly
manufacturing process. [7] Using the System Advisor Model
(SAM) developed by National Renewable Energy Labs,
thermal solar farms have a mild improvement over PV farms
when comparing output efficiency and capacity factor.
However, the significant cost savings proposed by this paper
are confirmed by the Levelized Cost of Energy. The SAM
simulation results are shown in Table 1. This evaluation
doesnt even take into account the savings in transportation to
a remote village.
Table 1: NREL-SAM Solar Comparison Results
100
MW
Solar
Farm Boulder, Co
PV
Stirling
Year 1 Annual
Energy (kWh)
145,858,781
153,495,000
LCOE (cents/kWh)
14.5749
10.1961
Capacity factor
17%
18%
DNI to Electric
Grid Output
Correlation
88%
99%
Efficiency Change
Baseline 25%
Reflectivity
Heat Losses
Footprint
Proposed
NA
-4%
+15%
+7%
Multiplication
Factor
0.25
0.96
1.15
1.07
0.295
not have an energy cost associated with its source, it uses the
production cost instead. Additionally, an assumed life span
of the device is factored into the equation. A higher EROEI
is better than a lower one, and an EROEI of over 40 would be
considered a technology suitable to replace the burning of
fossil fuel. The calculation used is therefore:
(4)
The energy produced in one year in a simplified format is:
(5)
The approximate solar insolation energy in Denver,
Colorado for one year is 72.33 kW/m^2, which is
approximately 260 MJ when the size of the dish is accounted
for [15]. The assumed energy produced is then 21.3 MJ per
year for our 29.5% efficient estimation.
In order to estimate the energy cost of producing the device
we used the approximate energy cost of the material. The
EPA estimates that woods such as plywood require 6
mmBtu/ton of primary energy to manufacture [16]. That
converts to 6.97 MJ/kg, giving a production energy cost of
this design of 71.6 MJ.
Using this method, the EROEI for this design is 8.94. This
is compared to fossil fuel EROEIs of 15-35, and wind EROEI
of 18 [14].
An additional method to look at the EROEI is to look at the
energy breakeven point. For this design, that point is at
approximately 3.33 years. While neither of these calculations
show this design to be competitive with fossil fuel generation,
it is significantly better than photovoltaic.
B. EROI
EROI measures the economic impact of an energy system by
indicating how much it costs in production to achieve a Watt
of peak power. In contrast to EROEI, a low number is better.
A standard calculation of EROI in renewable energy sources
is:
(6)
VIII. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
As an attempt to quantify a manufacturing cost, this
analysis takes the cost of the Stirling engine proposed
(~$300) and adds it to a common 1 [m] wide RF Antennae
Dish (-$100). Using earlier assumptions (1000 W/m 2), this
design would output approximately 295 W.
EROI would be $1.36/Wp. $2.5/Wp is considered
economically viable [6]. A comparable PV panel on the
market today costs $400 and generates 250 W, giving an
EROI of $1.60/Wp [17], making the solar Stirling a much
better option.
X. REFERENCES
[1] Solar Irradiance. Internet:
http://solarelectricityhandbook.com/solar-irradiance.html
[May 2, 2013]
[2] Amin, Narima; Langendoen, Richard, "Grameen Shakti: A
Renewable Energy Social Business Model for Global
Replication," Global Humanitarian Technology Conference
(GHTC), 2012 IEEE , vol., no., pp.324,327, 21-24 Oct. 2012
[3] Global Energy Network Institute, Map of African
Electrical Grid. Internet:
http://www.geni.org/globalenergy/library/national_energy_
grid/africa/africanelectricitygrid.shtml [May 5, 2013]
[4] Solar Panel Kit. Internet:
http://www.harborfreight.com/solar-panel-kit-45-watt68751.html [May 13, 2013]
[5] Global Energy Network Institute, Renewable Energy
Resources.
http://www.geni.org/globalenergy/library/renewableenergy-resources/world/africa/wind-africa/index.shtml [May
5, 2013]
[6] Norton, B.; , "Renewable electricity-what is the true
cost?," Power Engineering Journal , vol.13, no.1, pp.6-12,
Feb. 1999
[7] Faraz, T.; , "Benefits of Concentrating Solar Power over
Solar Photovoltaic for power generation in Bangladesh,"
Developments in Renewable Energy Technology (ICDRET),
2012 2nd International Conference on the , vol., no., pp.1-5,
5-7 Jan. 2012
[8] National Renewable Energy Laboratory, System Advisor
Model.Internet: https://sam.nrel.gov [May 8, 2013]
[9] "Sandia, Stirling Energy Systems Set New World Record
for Solar-to-grid Conversion Efficiency - February 12, 2008."
Sandia, Stirling Energy Systems Set New World Record for
Solar-to-grid Conversion Efficiency. Sandia National Labs, 12
Nov. 2008. Web. 13 Dec. 2012.
[10] "Optical Mirror Selection Guide." Optical Mirror
Selection Guide. Newport Corporation, 2012. Web. 13 Dec.
2012.
[11] Mancini, T; Heller, P; Butler, B; et. Al; , "Dish-Stirling
Systems: An Overview of Development and Status," ASME,
Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, vol. 125, pp. 135-151,
May 2003.
[12] Murphy, T. "The Energy Trap." Do the Math. UC San
Diego, 18 Oct. 2011. Web. 14 Dec. 2012.
[13] Murphy, D.J.; Hall, C.A.S. (2010). "Year in review EROI or
energy return on (energy) invested". Annals of the New York
Academy of Sciences 1185: 102118.
[14] "Surface Meteorology and Solar Energy." Surface
Meteorology and Solar Energy. National Aeronautics and
Space Administration, n.d. Web. 14 Dec. 2012.
[15] Biddle, M. "Recycling the Hard Stuff." Recycling the
Hard Stuff. Environmental Protection Agency, 1 July 2002.
Web.
[16] "250-Watt Monocrystalline Solar Panel." 250-Watt
Monocrystalline Solar Panel-GS-S-250-Fab5 at The Home
Depot. The Home Depot, n.d. Web. 14 Dec. 2012.