LEARNING TEAM EVALUATION

LEARNING TEAM_________

ASSIGNMENT ___________________________ WEEK_________

USING THE SCALE BELOW, INDIVIDUALLY RATE EACH MEMBER OF YOUR LEARNING TEAM, INCLUDING YOURSELF (PLEASE USE THE COLLABORATION GUIDE ON THE
NEXT PAGE FOR A MORE DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EACH CATEGORY).

4 = Excellent
Learning Team
Evaluati
on Form

Self Score
(Breanna
Archer)

3 = Good

2 = Fair

1 = Poor

0 = None

Team
Involvement

Time
Management

Establishing
and Following
Guidelines

Professional
Communication

Team
Contributions

Collaboration
Comments

(Active and
substantively
involved in the
team discussion)

(Supported team
timeline)

(Helped to define
and adhere to the
goals, roles, and
responsibilities of
the team)

(Communicated
clearly and
professionally)

(What did each team member

contribute to the assignment? What
value did that contribution add to
the completed assignment? )

(Please include any comments

describing why each person
received the collaboration score that
you gave them.)

score

score

score

score

comments

comments

This week I was in

charge of Submitting
the assignment, and
putting together the
Idealistic Leader.

Jessica was
responsible for
putting together the
commonly desired
traits and why they
are important for the
industry.

Team Member
(Jessica Crow)

Team Member
(Marilyn

Marilyn was
responsible for

I gave myself this

score because I have
been active this week,
and have been
keeping a close eye
on the team this week.
Jessica did a very
good job this week,
she even helped by
putting the outline as
a rough draft in a
format, which made it
much easier for me to
see how the team
would like the outline
to look. She was also
very active in
communicating this
week.
Marilyn was MIA for a
little while, however I

This form is designed to help in evaluating Learning Team collaboration expectations and performance. Substantive involvement in the Learning Team Collaborative Discussion
is defined as any posts or contribution that adds value to the overall discussion. This may include presenting new ideas, examples, perspective, or asking additional questions of
team members that help to further the overall team discussion. Students attending class at local campuses are encouraged to use the Online Learning Forums available in the
course eCampus page. They should also document any offline collaboration that is conducted in their Learning Teams.
February 2011

LEARNING TEAM EVALUATION

Waters)

describing what the

still gave her a 3
commonly
desired
because she did make
Learning Team Collaboration Guide
Leadership
styles are, sure
to notify
Team
Time
Establishing
and Following
Professional
and
why they are
everyone and she still
Involvement
Management
Guidelines
Communication
important to this Interactedwas
ablemembers
to get her
with other
of the team
with ainto
respectful
industry.
piece
the and
team in
Active and substantive
Supported team timeline and
Took the lead on establishing
professional
tone.
a quick enough
Excellent (4) involvement in team
met the assignment due date.
and following the goals, roles,
Communication was clear with
discussions.
and responsibilities of the team.
manner.
no typographical
or grammatical
Team Member
errors.
3
4
4
4
Responsible for
Christa did not appear
(Christa
describing methods
beother
toomembers
active in our
Interactedtowith
Rodriguez)
of developing Leaders
thread
this week,
Supported a majority of the
of the team
with a respectful
and
Good overall substantive
Helped to establish and follow
team timeline and met the
professional
tone.
and
how
they
balance
however
she
did
get
Good (3) involvement in team
the goals, roles, and
assignment due date.
Communication was clear with
discussion.
responsibilities
of
the
team.
competing values.minor typographical
this week
or started by
plotting
grammatical
errors. out the points
that needed to be
Interacted with other members
accomplished
of the team
with an informal this
Moderate substantive
Supported some of the team
Followed the goals, roles, and
tone. Communication
was
week.
Fair (2) involvement in team
timeline and met the
responsibilities of the team.
effective with minor
Team Member
discussion.
assignment due date.
typographical or grammatical
(Name)
errors.
Team Member
(Name)
Interactions with other members
of the team were disrespectful
Team Member
Minimal substantive
Did not support the team
Did not always follow the goals,
Poor (1)
and inappropriate at times.
(Name)
involvement in team
timeline but still met the
roles, and responsibilities of the
Communication was poor with
discussion.
assignment due date.
team.
Team
Contributions
numerous typographical or
Please consider the following when providing individual and team feedback on contributions made
to the assignment.
grammatical
errors.
1) Based on the contributions and collaboration for this assignment, should all team members get the same grade? If not, who
should get
a differentingrade
or lower)
and why? Did not follow team goals, roles, No communication.
No substantive
involvement
Did(higher
not support
the team
None (0)
team
timeline
. completed product? How
or responsibilities.
2) discussion.
What value you did you add
to the
does that compare to your teammates?
3) What can you, personally, do to improve future team collaborations?
*Please review the Learning Team Collaboration Guide on the next page for a description of the expectations for each category.

This form is designed to help in evaluating Learning Team collaboration expectations and performance. Substantive involvement in the Learning Team Collaborative Discussion
is defined as any posts or contribution that adds value to the overall discussion. This may include presenting new ideas, examples, perspective, or asking additional questions of
team members that help to further the overall team discussion. Students attending class at local campuses are encouraged to use the Online Learning Forums available in the
course eCampus page. They should also document any offline collaboration that is conducted in their Learning Teams.
February 2011

LEARNING TEAM EVALUATION

This form is designed to help in evaluating Learning Team collaboration expectations and performance. Substantive involvement in the Learning Team Collaborative Discussion
is defined as any posts or contribution that adds value to the overall discussion. This may include presenting new ideas, examples, perspective, or asking additional questions of
team members that help to further the overall team discussion. Students attending class at local campuses are encouraged to use the Online Learning Forums available in the
course eCampus page. They should also document any offline collaboration that is conducted in their Learning Teams.
February 2011