Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Resilience Under Fire: Perspectives On The Work of Experienced, Inner City High School Teachers in The United States
Resilience Under Fire: Perspectives On The Work of Experienced, Inner City High School Teachers in The United States
Resilience Under Fire: Perspectives On The Work of Experienced, Inner City High School Teachers in The United States
Abstract
Teachers working in inner city high schools in the United States face enormous challenges. Their students, most of
whom come from economically disadvantaged minority families and often do not speak English as a rst language, present
a daunting array of educational needs for teachers and schools. Resources and school structures are seldom sufcient for
the task. Despite such conditions, some urban high school teachers persist for many years in the classroom and experience
success and satisfaction in their work. Through a survey and extended interviews, this study identies three broad factors
that motivated a group of these teachers to remain in inner city classrooms for more than 12 years: (1) the students,
(2) professional and personal satisfaction, and (3) support from administrators, colleagues and the organisation of the
school. The study discusses how the teachers resilience enabled them to overcome difcult challenges and recurring
setbacks and to persist vigorously in their work. Further study of resilience in inner city teachers is recommended.
r 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Teacher resilience; Teacher persistence; Teacher motivation; Inner city teacher; Inner city high schools
1. Introduction
In this article, the term inner city refers to a
particular kind of urban high school: one that serves
largely poor, minority students (African-American,
Hispanic, Native American, immigrant Asian) (see
also Coombes & Danaher, this volume; Gordon,
Umar, Gobbo, & Rodriguez, this volume) and that
is situated in or draws its students from economically depressed neighbourhoods. Many urban high
schools, because they serve higher socioeconomic
status neighbourhoods and include white students
as well as minorities, do not t this denition of
inner city.
0742-051X/$ - see front matter r 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.tate.2006.04.027
ARTICLE IN PRESS
G.J. Brunetti / Teaching and Teacher Education 22 (2006) 812825
813
2001; Marston, Brunetti, & Courtney, 2005; Marston, Courtney, & Brunetti, 2006). In these studies,
we asked teachers to complete the Experienced
Teacher Survey (ETS), in which they rated their
satisfaction with teaching and the extent to which
various factors contributed to their decision to
remain in the classroom. We then interviewed
teachers with 15 or more years in the classroom
selected from those who had returned the survey. In
the interviews, we further explored the teachers
motivations for remaining in the classroom, as well
as their perspectives on various aspects of their
practice.
2.1. Resilience
3. Methodology
3.1. Context of the study
Presidio High School is situated in the heart of a
large Californian city about two miles from the
downtown area. The school serves approximately
950 students, most of whom come from the
predominantly Latino area nearby or from largely
impoverished African-American or new immigrant
Asian neighbourhoods. The neighbourhoods match
those described earlier: While culturally rich with a
variety of restaurants and shops, they also show
ARTICLE IN PRESS
814
ARTICLE IN PRESS
G.J. Brunetti / Teaching and Teacher Education 22 (2006) 812825
815
3.4.3. Limitations
Because of the emic nature of this study and the
way that I conducted itbased as it is heavily on
the insights provided by the teachers in their
interviewssome of the ndings are not independently veriable nor can they be easily generalised
to other high schools or even to other teachers in the
same school.
3.5. Data analysis
3.5.1. Satisfaction with teaching
Before moving to an analysis of the interviews, it
is useful to gain a sense of the interviewed teachers
overall satisfaction with their work. Table 2 shows
the responses of the teachers to four ETS measures
on job satisfaction. The most positive rating on this
scale would be a 4 (strongly agree with the
statement). With mean scores from 2.94 to 3.38,
we can see that the respondents expressed a
moderately high degree of satisfaction with their
jobs, especially on Item 3, I would choose teaching
again. The teachers ratings on I would like to
still be teaching in ve years were affected by the
near retirement age of some of the teachers.
Table 2
Mean scores and standard deviations of interviewed Teachers on
Job Satisfaction Items (ETS)
1.
2.
3.
4.
2.94 (0.73)
3.00 (0.93)
3.38 (0.52)
3.06 (0.81)
Table 1
The interviewed teachers
Namea
Sex
Subject eld
Total years at
PHS
Margaret
Ken
Earl
Bridget
Marie
David
Jenny
Victoria
Ted
F
M
M
F
F
M
F
F
M
Social Studies
Spanish
Social Studies, English
English
Media, Social Studies
English
Science
Reading, English as a second language
Special education
36
17
26
13
18
16
14
25
23
33
5
4
5
5
3
2
7
15
ARTICLE IN PRESS
816
ARTICLE IN PRESS
G.J. Brunetti / Teaching and Teacher Education 22 (2006) 812825
817
ARTICLE IN PRESS
818
ARTICLE IN PRESS
G.J. Brunetti / Teaching and Teacher Education 22 (2006) 812825
819
ARTICLE IN PRESS
820
ARTICLE IN PRESS
G.J. Brunetti / Teaching and Teacher Education 22 (2006) 812825
821
ARTICLE IN PRESS
822
Not important
Of little
importance
Somewhat
important
Very important
To what extent has your decision to continue working as a classroom teacher been inuenced by the
following factors, some intrinsic to your work, others extrinsic?
For each factor, circle the number indicating how important it is for you:
1. Satisfaction in fullling a
professional commitment.
2. Satisfaction in serving
society (e.g., making a
difference by educating
future citizens)
3. Satisfaction in working
with young people (including
Not
important
Of little
Importance
Some
what
important
Very
important
Inter
viewed
(N 9)
mean
(S.D)
Returned
Survey
(N 33)
mean
(S.D)
3.44 (0.53)
3.38 (0.98)
3.67 (0.71)
3.59 (0.86)
3.67 (0.50)
3.70 (0.68)
ARTICLE IN PRESS
G.J. Brunetti / Teaching and Teacher Education 22 (2006) 812825
involvement in
extracurricular activities)
4. Satisfaction in being
successful at something you
enjoy (born to teach)
5. Satisfaction at seeing
young people learn and grow
6. Joy in teaching your
subject
7. The intellectual challenges
involved in teaching
8. Freedom and exibility in
the classroom
9. The opportunity to be
creative (e.g., in designing
curriculum and lessons)
10. Nowhere else to go (after
many years in teaching)
11. The holidays, summer
vacation, Christmas and
spring breaks, etc.
12. Job security (tenure)
13. Salary and benets
14. Enjoyment of school as
an institution
15. Advantages of a teaching
schedule for someone raising
a family
16. Good teacher colleagues
(e.g., interesting, supportive,
committed to teaching)
17. A good principal (e.g.,
able, open, supportive, good
manager)
18. Supportive parents,
community
823
3.78 (0.44)
3.76 (0.50)
3.89 (0.33)
3.85 (0.44)
3.33 (0.50)
3.59 (0.50)
3.67 (0.50)
3.52 (0.62)
3.44 (0.53)
3.64 (0.49)
3.67 (0.50)
3.61 (0.56)
2.00 (0.87)
1.45 (0.72)
3.25 (0.71)
2.97 (0.93)
1
1
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
4
4
4
3.12 (0.64)
2.75 (0.89)
2.00 (0.71)
2.88 (1.04)
2.67 (1.06)
2.50 (0.88)
2.33 (1.12)
2.25 (1.08)
3.11 (0.78)
3.45 (0.67)
3.11 (0.93)
3.56 (0.72)
2.44 (1.01)
2.83 (0.99)
Strongly
disagree
Disagree
Agree
Strongly
agree
Interviewed
(N 9)
mean
(SD)
Returned
survey
(N 33)
mean
(SD)
2.94 (0.73)
3.17(0.74)
3.00(0.93)
3.48(0.73)
3.38 (0.52)
3.52 (0.57)
ARTICLE IN PRESS
824
2
2
3
3
4
4
3.06 (0.81)
2.38(0.74)
3.29 (0.74)
2.44 (0.82)
2.71 (0.49)
2.77 (0.61)
If you have further explanations or comments, please write them below or on a separate piece of paper.
I would like to conduct individual interviews with some of you to explore further your experiences in
teaching and your motivations for remaining in the high school classroom. I anticipate that each interview,
scheduled at your convenience, will run approximately 1 to 1 1/2 hours. Would you be willing to be interviewed?
___Yes
___No
___Possibly. Please call me.
If you answered Yes or Possibly, please include your name and telephone number
so that I can call you.
Name _________________________ Phone Number: ( )_____________
References
Aronson, R. (2001). At-risk students defy the odds: Overcoming
barriers to educational Success. Blue Ridge Summit, PA:
Scarecrow.
Ball, S. J., & Goodson, I. F. (1985). Understanding
teachers: Concepts and contexts. In S. J. Ball, & I. F.
Goodson (Eds.), Teachers lives and careers (pp. 124). Lewes,
UK: Falmer.
Bobek, B. L. (2002). Teacher resiliency: A key to career longevity.
The Clearing House, 75(4), 202205.
Brunetti, G. J. (2001). Why do they teach? A study of job
satisfaction among long-term high school teachers. Teacher
Education Quarterly, 28(3), 4974.
California Department of Education (2004). API description:
Overview of the academic performance index (API). Retrieved 30 June 2005, from http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/ap/
apidescription.asp
California Secretary of State. (1998). English language in public
schools. Initiative statute. Retrieved 14 March 2005 from
http://primary98.ss.ca.gov/VoterGuide/Propositions/227text.
htm
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory.
Chicago, IL: Aldine.
Goodson, I. F., & Hargreaves, A. (Eds.). (1996). Teachers
professional lives. London: Falmer.
Goodson, I. F., & Sikes, P. (2001). Life history research in
educational settings: Learning from lives. Buckingham, UK:
Open University Press.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
G.J. Brunetti / Teaching and Teacher Education 22 (2006) 812825
Muchmore, J. A. (2004). A teachers life: Stories of literacy,
teacher thinking and professional development. Halifax, NS:
Backalong Books.
Patterson, J. H., Collins, L., & Abbott, G. (2004). A study of
teacher resilience in urban schools. Journal of Instructional
Psychology, 31(1), 311.
Stanford, B. H. (2001). Reections of resilient, persevering urban
teachers. Teacher Education Quarterly, 28(3), 7587.
825