This decision matrix compares 4 potential assistants on 4 criteria: effectiveness, cost, availability, and portability. Jarmel scores highest with a total of 15, followed by Sara with 14, then Trisha and Jason tied with 12. Jarmel rates highest in effectiveness and is cost effective and portable.
This decision matrix compares 4 potential assistants on 4 criteria: effectiveness, cost, availability, and portability. Jarmel scores highest with a total of 15, followed by Sara with 14, then Trisha and Jason tied with 12. Jarmel rates highest in effectiveness and is cost effective and portable.
This decision matrix compares 4 potential assistants on 4 criteria: effectiveness, cost, availability, and portability. Jarmel scores highest with a total of 15, followed by Sara with 14, then Trisha and Jason tied with 12. Jarmel rates highest in effectiveness and is cost effective and portable.