Oral Reading Fluency Norms: Fall Winter Spring

You might also like

Download as xls, pdf, or txt
Download as xls, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Oral Reading Fluency Norms

90
75
50 (Low Risk)
25 (Some Risk)
10 (At Risk)
90
75
50 (Low Risk)
25 (Some Risk)
10 (At Risk)
90
75
50 (Low Risk)
25 (Some Risk)
10 (At Risk)
90
75
50 (Low Risk)
25 (Some Risk)
10 (At Risk)
90
75
50 (Low Risk)
25 (Some Risk)
10 (At Risk)
90
75
50 (Low Risk)
25 (Some Risk)
10 (At Risk)
90
75
50 (Low Risk)
25 (Some Risk)
10 (At Risk)
90
75
50 (Low Risk)
25 (Some Risk)

not tested

44
26-43
25

77
53-76
52

93
71-92
70

104
81-103
80

109
83-108
82

106
79
51
25
11
128
99
71
44
21
145
119
94
68
45
166
139
110
85
61
177
153
127
98
68
180
156
128
102
79
185
161
133
106

20
8 - 19
7

68
52-67
51

92
67-91
66

105
83-104
82

115
94-114
93

120
99-119
98

81
47
23
12
6
125
100
72
42
18
146
120
92
62
36
166
139
112
87
61
182
156
127
99
74
195
167
140
111
82
192
165
136
109
88
199
173
146
115

40
20 - 39
19

90
70-89
69

110
80-109
79

118
96-117
95

124
103-123
102

125
104-124
103

111
82
53
28
15
142
117
89
61
31
162
137
107
78
48
180
152
123
98
72
194
168
139
109
83
204
177
150
122
93
202
177
150
123
98
199
177
151
124

Averag

End of
e
Year Weekly
USOE

Hasbrou
ck &
Tindal
2005

WCPM
DIBELS

WCPM
Hasbrouc
k&
Tindal
2005

Spring

DIBELS

Hasbrouc
k&
Tindal
2005

Fall WCPM
DIBELS

Percentile
Grade or Risk
Factor

Winter

60

80

100

120-150

120-150

120-150

n/a

n/a

Growth
(In WPM)

1.9
2.2
1.9
1.0
0.6
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.1
0.6
1.1
1.2
1.1
1.1
0.8
1.1
1.0
0.9
0.9
0.8
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.6

10

(At Risk)

77

84

97

Sources: http://dibels.uoregon.edu/benchmark.php
Hasbrouck, J., & Tindal, G. (2006) Oral reading fluency norms: A valuable assessment tool for reading teachers The Reading Teacher, 59(7), 636-644.

0.6

You might also like