PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Petitioner, vs. HON. FELICIDAD CARANDANG VILLALON and FEDERICO DE GUZMAN, Respondents.
G.R. No. 43659 December 21, 1990
REGALADO, J.:
CASE DIGEST
CRIM PRO
PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Petitioner, vs. HON. FELICIDAD CARANDANG VILLALON and FEDERICO DE GUZMAN, Respondents.
G.R. No. 43659 December 21, 1990
REGALADO, J.:
CASE DIGEST
CRIM PRO
PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Petitioner, vs. HON. FELICIDAD CARANDANG VILLALON and FEDERICO DE GUZMAN, Respondents.
G.R. No. 43659 December 21, 1990
REGALADO, J.:
CASE DIGEST
CRIM PRO
and FEDERICO DE GUZMAN, Respondents. G.R. No. 43659 December 21, 1990 REGALADO, J.: FACTS: De Guzman was charged with estafa thru falsification of public document on March 29, 1974. As the attorney-in-fact of Mariano Carrera (complainant), in 1964, De Guzman forged his signature on the special power of attorney (SPA) to use it to mortgage Carreras parel of land and obtain a loan from the mortgage bank. Both documents (Power of Atty. and mortgage contract) were later registered with the Registry of Deeds of Pangasinan. The mortgage foreclosed, the land was bought by someone else, and Carrera only knew about it when an action for ejectment was filed against him by the new owner in 1972. The trial court dismissed the case against De Guzman on the grounds that the said crime, which was punishable by prision correcional, already prescribed, pursuant to Art. 90 of the RPC. The SC affirmed the challenged decision of the trial court, ruling that the crime prescribed upon the public registry of the power of attorney which is considered a notice to the whole world. ISSUES: 1. W/n the charge of estafa thru falsification of a public document has sufficient basis to exist in law and in fact 2. W/n the crime has prescribed HELD: 1. YES. Falsification is only the means necessary to commit the estafa because before the falsified document is used to defraud another, the crime of falsification was already consummated. The damages were caused by the commission of estafa. The alleged authorization given to De Guzman to get a loan from the Bank only pertains to the half owned by Marianos brother. In his testimony, Mariano only quoted his brother. 2. YES. The start of the prescriptive period was when the falsified SPA was registed in the Registry of Deeds on Feb. 13, 1964. In a crime of falsification of public document, the prescriptive period commences from the time the offended party had constructive notice of the alleged forgery after the document was registered with the Register of Deeds.