The document reviews an article that advises the President's critics to avoid directly opposing the President's efforts to stop illegal drugs. It discusses a recent issue between President Duterte and Chief Justice Sereno regarding martial law. While the author supports stopping illegal drugs, they note that declaring martial law could abuse rights and allow authorities to act abusively, as occurred during the previous period of martial law. The document also explains that the 1987 Philippine Constitution established new processes for declaring martial law that involve approval from Congress and review by the Supreme Court.
The document reviews an article that advises the President's critics to avoid directly opposing the President's efforts to stop illegal drugs. It discusses a recent issue between President Duterte and Chief Justice Sereno regarding martial law. While the author supports stopping illegal drugs, they note that declaring martial law could abuse rights and allow authorities to act abusively, as occurred during the previous period of martial law. The document also explains that the 1987 Philippine Constitution established new processes for declaring martial law that involve approval from Congress and review by the Supreme Court.
The document reviews an article that advises the President's critics to avoid directly opposing the President's efforts to stop illegal drugs. It discusses a recent issue between President Duterte and Chief Justice Sereno regarding martial law. While the author supports stopping illegal drugs, they note that declaring martial law could abuse rights and allow authorities to act abusively, as occurred during the previous period of martial law. The document also explains that the 1987 Philippine Constitution established new processes for declaring martial law that involve approval from Congress and review by the Supreme Court.
Presidents critics The article is trying to advice the Presidents critics to never go on the presidents way of stopping, or fighting illegal drugs. The article stated how the issue of Martial Law arises 6 days ago between President Rodrigo R. Duterte and Chief Justice Lourdes sereno. The column also elaborated how the drug trafficking faced by the present administration to end. And the message tells that the nation should understand the Presidents words under the context that the Presidents anti- drug campaign cannot wait for the slow wheels of justice Philippine style. But the author never stated or elaborated what Martial Law is all about, its advantage and disadvantage to the Filipino people and to the nation and how this law is being implemented. I wish the article give the reader an awareness of the said law. The knowledge regarding this will help the reader where to stand in this issue and if they are going to agree or not in the Presidents position to this kind of power He possessed. Regarding the issue of Martial Law. In my opinion, perhaps put of by the letter of chief justice, which he saw as Six days ago, President Duterte warned Chief Justice Sereno to get out of his way regarding illegal drugs criticism of his war on drugs and that is the time when the president asked if she would like him to declare martial law. Im on the side of the president in terms of stopping illegal drugs that obviously ruined the life of someone who uses illegal drugs and also a sympathy to their victims. Filipinos are killed even the babies are not safe because of illegal drugs and at this point under the new administration the crime rate is continuing in reaching the lower level of 40 percent. And I commend to the new government to that. But for the president to declare another martial law after 35 years of being free from that
law is not a joke. Because martial law means military discipline,
arresting individual without warrant, curfew hours, banning a group assemblies, closure of media meaning rights could be abused and authorities can be abusive. But unlike before, martial law can be declare of the commander in chief when the public safety requires it. The Philippine Constitution of 1987, specifies that a state of martial law cannot override the function of both the judiciary and legislative branches of the government and declaring a martial law has a new process according to phil. Constitution that says that the declaration should be affirmed by the congress and via vote and even will review by the supreme court.