Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Task 2
Task 2
ASSHADWI PANEERSELVAM
Consequently, the test papers were marked and the score obtained by the pupils has
been tabulated. The results are shown in the table below:
4 Thamarai Formative Assessment Results
No
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
Name
Aarthi D/O Manivannan
Daarnitha D/O Ravichandran
Davechelvan S/O Thanimalai
Divaagar S/O Gunasegaran
Elavarasi D/O Peter Collin
Gajeswaran S/O Pathmanathan
Gurudeva S/O Gobalan
Harun Bin Abdullah
Kadtirvel S/O Muthoovell
Keerthana D/O Sarveswaren
Komathi D/O Parani Kumaran
Laesyashini D/O Guru Nathan
Liwasssini D/O Tanabala Singam
Neevashan S/O Sathiaseelan
Paavendhran S/O Kasivisvanathan
Resuvan S/O Manickavasagam
Shangkari D/O Sasi Kumar
Sharvin S/O Muthu Krishnan
Sumathi D/O Cristopher Krishnan
Tharvin Raj S/O M.Rajan
Vimalan S/O Ramesh
Vishvanath S/O Ramasamy@Ramu
Yuvathi D/O Sugumaran
Marks
51%
20%
16%
36%
16%
78%
49%
20%
26%
29%
20%
27%
20%
44%
78%
27%
18%
44%
35%
42%
15%
40%
46%
Thereupon, the mode, mean, median and standard deviation were calculated as follow:
ASSHADWI PANEERSELVAM
Mode=
The
data
above
displays
the
mode, mean,
median
and
standard
deviation
Mean=
of
23
=797
performance
the
Mode= 20
=51+20+16+36+16+78+49+20+26+29+20+27+20+44+78+27+18+44+35+42+15+40+46
the
of
15, 16,16, 18, 20, 20, 20, 20, 26, 27, 27, 29, 35, 36, 40, 42, 44, 44, 46, 49, 51, 78, 78
23
=34.65
Thamarai
pupils in the
test.
The
mode
indicates the
highest
frequency
the
of
scores
received is 20
since 4 pupils
out
of
23
obtained
the
pupils
same
score.
This group is
heterogeneous as the number of pupils obtained identical scores is small. The mean
generated which is 34.65 from the analysis indicates that the group of pupils performance is
not satisfying. This shows that the average of mean is below 50 percentile of the group. The
median shows 28. The difference between mean and the median again highlights that the
ASSHADWI PANEERSELVAM
achievement of the pupils is unsatisfactory level. The standard implies the pupils in this
group are heterogeneous as it is showcasing a wide range of competency level on the test.
No
1.
Name
Aarthi D/O Manivannan
Marks
51%
Formula
51-
Z Score
0.93
T Score
59.3
ASSHADWI PANEERSELVAM
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
20%
34.65/17.53
20-
-0.84
41.6
16%
34.65/17.53
16-
-1.06
39.4
36%
34.65/17.53
36-
0.08
50.8
16%
34.65/17.53
16-
-1.06
39.4
78%
34.65/17.53
78-
2.47
74.7
49%
34.65/17.53
49-
0.82
58.2
20%
34.65/17.53
20-
-0.84
41.6
26%
34.65/17.53
26-
-0.49
45.1
29%
34.65/17.53
29-
-0.32
46.8
20%
34.65/17.53
20-
-0.84
41.6
27%
34.65/17.53
27-
-0.44
45.6
-0.84
41.6
13.
20%
34.65/17.53
20-
14.
44%
34.65/17.53
44-
0.53
55.3
15.
78%
34.65/17.53
78-
2.47
74.7
16.
27%
34.65/17.53
27-
-0.44
45.6
17.
18%
34.65/17.53
18-
-0.95
40.5
18.
44%
34.65/17.53
44-
0.53
55.3
19.
35%
34.65/17.53
35-
0.02
50.2
20.
42%
34.65/17.53
42-
0.42
54.2
21.
15%
34.65/17.53
15-
-1.12
38.8
22.
40%
34.65/17.53
40-
0.31
53.1
34.65/17.53
ASSHADWI PANEERSELVAM
23.
46%
46-
0.65
56.5
34.65/17.53
0-10
11-20
0
8
21-30
31-40
41-50
51-60
61-70
71-80
81-90
91-100
ASSHADWI PANEERSELVAM
TEST RESULTS
4.5
Mean:
4
3.5
3
2.5
Frequency
Median :
2
1.5
Mode:
0.5
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Score
Based on the graph plotted, positively skewed distribution has been obtained. This
indicates that the performance of the pupils is not satisfying. Meanwhile, the test is
challenging for the level of the pupils. According to Rachard Antonius (2003) if the mean is
larger than median, the distribution is positively skewed.
ASSHADWI PANEERSELVAM