Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Vandelli 2015
Vandelli 2015
394
Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, Vol. 24, No. 2 (February), 2015: pp 394-400
Introduction
Thrombolytic therapy with administration of intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (iv rtPA)
has been shown to improve long-term functional
outcome, and it is recommended for the treatment of
eligible acute ischemic stroke patients.1 This therapy,
however, is associated with an increased risk of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhages (sICH). Symptomatic
intracranial bleeding in stroke patients treated with iv
rtPA is approximately 6%-8%2-4 and is associated with a
worse clinical outcome. It is, however, not known what
proportion of a worse outcome is attributable to sICH
as there is an overlap between the risk factors for
thrombolysis-associated sICH and those for poor
outcome after thrombolytic therapy with no sICH.2
Many studies have evaluated sICH risk factors in
patients receiving thrombolytic therapy, and 2 recent
systematic reviews identified the most relevant ones:
hyperglycemia, early ischemic changes on computed
tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging scan,
clinical stroke severity assessed by the National Institutes
of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score on admission,
advanced age, and high blood pressure.2,3,5-10
The pathophysiological mechanisms of hemorrhagic
cerebral transformations could result from the reperfusion of intracranial arteries whose integrity has been disrupted by cerebral ischemia, with an alteration in the
bloodbrain barrier and an increase in capillary permeability.3
Within this complex pathophysiological process, a central role is played by fibrinogen. rtPA binds to plasminogen within the clot, converting it to plasmin that is a
proteolytic enzyme capable of breaking cross-links between fibrin molecules and so dissolving clots, releasing
fibrin(ogen) degradation products (FDPs). It is important
to note, however, that plasmin is fairly nonspecific in its
activity and, besides fibrin, will also break down other
circulating proteins, including fibrinogen.11,12 In short,
although rtPA is relatively selective for clot-associated
fibrin, it can produce a systemic fibrinolytic state (with a
secondary hypofibrinogenemia and a D-dimer increase12)
and bleeding complications, which were first reported in
the setting of the treatment of acute myocardial infarction
(AMI). The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction trial13
showed that both streptokinase and rtPA caused a
decrease in fibrinogen levels and an increase in FDP
and that the rate of hemorrhagic events was higher in patients with increased FDP in both treatment groups and in
patients with reduced fibrinogen levels in the rtPA group.
Moreover, there were more hemorrhages in patients with
greater plasma changes, underlining the importance of
coagulation parameters.13,14 Collen et al15 analyzed coagulation and fibrinolysis parameters during intravenous
rtPA infusions in patients with AMI and showed that
the extent of fibrinogen breakdown is occasionally very
395
Neuroimaging
On admission, all patients underwent a noncontrast
brain CT scan, which was repeated about 24 hours and
L. VANDELLI ET AL.
396
7 days post-treatment; an additional control scan was conducted whenever neurologic worsening was observed in
the first 7 days. We considered every intracranial bleeding
that occurred within the first 7 days post-thrombolysis,
including both symptomatic and asymptomatic hemorrhages, classifying them according to the Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke radiological criteria.
Early hemorrhages (early ICH) were those occurring
within 24 hours post-thrombolytic treatment. Hemorrhagic transformations were categorized as sICH if
patients had neurologic deterioration with an NIHSS increase of more than 1 point and if the CT scan revealed
blood at any site in the brain irrespective of its extension
(National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
classification). All neuroimaging studies were reviewed
by 2 independent, certified, expert neurologists blinded
to fibrinogen-level assessment.
Statistical Analysis
We assessed fibrinogen-level changes after thrombolytic therapy. A threshold of fibrinogen plasma value critical for the development of bleeding is not reported in the
literature. Some studies13,15 have reported a correlation
between bleeding and fibrinogen values less than 1.5 or
1.0 g/L or less than 1.0 and .5 g/L. A more recent study,
which evaluated the role of fibrinogen concentrate
substitution therapy in patients with massive hemorrhage and low plasma fibrinogen concentrations, considered 2 g/L to be the threshold value.17
On these grounds, we performed a logistic regression
analysis that analyzed different levels of both absolute
fibrinogen plasma values and percentage decrease. We
analyzed the following absolute fibrinogen plasma levels
as independent variables: lower than 3, 2.5, 2, and 1. We
then tested the percentage decrease of fibrinogen values
calculated as the percentage of the proportion between
the difference of fibrinogen values after and before treatment, divided by the fibrinogen value before treatment:
% decrease5fibrinogen value after treatment2
fibrinogen value before treatment=
fibrinogen value before treatment%:
For the analysis, we considered only negative values that
indicate a decrease in the fibrinogen values after the treatment, and we chose to analyze decreases exceeding 45%,
40%, 35%, 30%, 25%, 20%, 15%, and 10%.
After these analyses, we set the cutoff values as fibrinogen absolute levels after treatment below 2 g/L and/or
25% decrease or more, between pre- and post-treatment.
This choice derives from the comparison of the logistic
regression results between the infarction (dependent
variable) and the different absolute values of fibrinogen
and between the infarction (dependent variable) and the
different values of percentage decrease in fibrinogen: in
Results
A total of 104 patients were included in this study, 66
(63.5%) men and 38 (36.5%) women. The mean age was
66.6 years (standard deviation [SD] 13.5; range 21-91)
and the mean baseline NIHSS was 10.9 (SD 7.2; range
2-34).
On the seventh day follow-up CT scan, 24 patients
(23.1%) presented ICH (3 HI1, 8 HI2, 2 PH1, 7 PH2, and
4 PHr1), 14 of which developed in the first 24 hours
(3 HI1, 3 HI2, 1 PH1, 4 PH2, and 3 PHr1). Only 6 patients
(5.8%) experienced sICH according to the NINDS classification.
Mean fibrinogen pretreatment level was 3.34 g/L (SD
1.1) with a significant decrease after thrombolysis
(2.47 g/L, 226%, SD .8; P , .001 respect to baseline).
Logistic analysis found a significant association between
baseline fibrinogen value and ICH (P 5 .048) that became
more significant when comparing ICH and fibrinogen
post-thrombolysis level (P 5 .029).
A logistic regression analysis of the most well-known
ICH risk factors (age, sex, baseline NIHSS, 24-hour
NIHSS, pre-rtPA arterial blood pressure, pre-rtPA glycemia; baseline platelet count) showed that only baseline
NIHSS (P , .001) and 24-hour NIHSS (P , .001) were
significantly associated with ICH (Table 1).
397
OR
95% CI
L. VANDELLI ET AL.
398
Variable
Age (mean)
Sex (male %)
Baseline NIHSS (mean)
24-h NIHSS (mean)
Glycemia (mean)
Blood pressure (systolic)
Blood pressure (diastolic)
Platelet count
Fibrinogen-level
prethrombolysis (mean)
66.71
65.9
12.8
9.34
135.78
148.63
78.54
207.73
362.21
66.46
61.9
9.71
7.27
133.86
146.78
78.71
192.11
311.72
P
NS
NS
.031*
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
.028*
Discussion
The development of ICH is the most serious adverse
event related to iv rtPA as it carries a relevant morbidity
Clinical severity
Mild (NIHSS
score 0-7)
Moderate (NIHSS
score 8-15)
Severe (NIHSS
sore .15)
Fibrinogen
group
Mean
Normal
Low
Normal
Low
Normal
Low
4.83
4.31
10.48
11.36
20.58
22.14
P*
SD
30
13
21
14
12
14
1.46
1.75 .319
2.58
2.50 .324
3.34
4.82 .355
OR
95% CI
7.47
,.001
2.26-24.74
1.15
1.01
1.00
,.001
.131
.802
1.06-1.25
1.00-1.02
.97-1.03
6 (9.5%)
4 (28.6%)
2 (33.3%)
2 (40%)
18 (43.9%)
10 (71.4%)
4 (66.7%)
3 (60%)
24
14
6
5
P
,.001*
.008*
.586
.480
399
L. VANDELLI ET AL.
400
References
1. Adams HP, Del Zoppo G, Alberts MJ, et al. A guideline
from the American Heart Association/American Stroke
Association Stroke Council, Clinical Cardiology Council,
Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention Council, and
the Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease and
Quality of Care Outcomes in Research Interdisciplinary
Working Groups. Stroke 2007;38:1655-1711.
2. Lansberg MG, Albers GW, Wijman CA. Symptomatic
intracerebral hemorrhage following thrombolytic therapy for acute ischemic stroke: a review of the risk factors.
Cerebrovasc Dis 2007;24:1-10.
3. Derex L, Nighoghossian N. Intracerebral haemorrhage
after thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke: an update.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2008;79:1093-1099.
4. Seet RC, Rabinstein AA. Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage following intravenous thrombolysis for acute
ischemic stroke: a critical review of case definitions. Cerebrovasc Dis 2012;34:106-114.
5. Trouillas P, Von Kummer R. Classification and pathogenesis of cerebral hemorrhages after thrombolysis in
ischemic stroke. Stroke 2006;37:556-561.
6. Derex L, Hermier M, Adeleine P, et al. Clinical and imaging predictors of intracerebral hemorrhage in stroke
patients treated with intravenous tissue plasminogen
activator. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005;76:70-75.
7. Ribo M, Montaner J, Molina CA, et al. Admission fibrinolytic profile is associated with symptomatic hemorrhagic
transformation in stroke patients treated with tissue plasminogen activator. Stroke 2004;35:2123-2127.
8. Cocho D, Borrell M, Marti-Fabregas J, et al. Pretreatment
hemostatic markers of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage in patients treated with tissue plasminogen activator. Stroke 2006;37:996-999.
9. Kellert L, Sykora M, Gumbinger C, et al. Blood pressure
variability after intravenous thrombolysis in acute stroke
does not predict intracerebral hemorrhage but poor
outcome. Cerebrovasc Dis 2012;33:135-140.
10. K
ohrmann M, Schellinger PD. Symptomatic intracranial
hemorrhage after thrombolysis. Cerebrovasc Dis 2007;
23:83-84.
11. Klabunde RE. Cardiovascular Physiology Concepts. 2nd
ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins/Baltimore 2011.
12. Francis CW, Kornberg A. Fibrinogen- and fibrindegradation products during fibrinolytic therapy. Ann
N Y Acad Sci 1992;667:310-323.
13. Rao AK, Pratt C, Breke A, et al. Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) trial-phase I. Hemorrhagic mani-
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.