Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ais Auditing Adm4346a
Ais Auditing Adm4346a
Ais Auditing Adm4346a
ADM 4346 A
Fall 2015
Professor
Office
Telephone
E-Mail
Office Hours
Class Location
Class Hours
Prerequisite(s)
Program of Study
Thursday 19:00-22:00
ADM 3349
Optional Course of Specialization in Accounting
Due Date
Weight on
Final Grade
10%
Mid-Term Examination
20%
10%
30%
30%
Course Deliverable
Class Participation
100%
TOTAL
Page 1
Course Description
This course introduces the student to the world of information technology and accounting
information systems as it affects the internal and external auditor. With virtually every company,
even small businesses, using some kind of computerized accounting system, audits in this day
and age must adapt to this phenomena. In order for the accountant and auditor to adjust, he/she
must understand accounting information systems and thus be better equipped to modify
traditional compliance and substantive auditing techniques to cope with the automated business
processes. This course covers this topic, along with other related current topics in the industry, in
bringing auditing into the 21st century.
As such, this course contributes to the following learning goals of the Telfer B.Com.:
LG1
LG2
LG3
Page 2
Page 3
Computer Security
Disaster Recovery Plans
E-Crime
Computer Fraud
Web Trust
SysTrust
EDI
Artificial Intelligence and Expert Systems
Cloud computing
Enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems
Auditing the Internet
Continuous Auditing
XBRL
etc
A more detailed outline of the requirements of the Group Project will be presented
during class.
6. Final Examination (30%)
The final examination will consist of a 3 hour comprehensive exam covering the material
from the whole course. It will be held during the regularly scheduled examination period.
Please note that it is not possible to submit extra course work in order to improve your
mark.
Page 4
Textbook/Course Package
REQUIRED TEXT AND HANDBOOK
1. Core Concepts of Accounting Information Systems, Canadian Edition (2014), John
Wiley & Sons, Canada Ltd, by Mark G. Simkin, Jacob M. Rose, Carolyn S. Norman,
and Scott Paquette - ISBN # 978-1-118-73810-8.
2. Auditing Cases An Interactive Learning Approach, 6th Edition (2015), Pearson
Prentice Hall, by Mark S. Beasley, Frank Buckless, Steven Glover and Douglas
Prawitt ISBN # 978-0-13-385210-3.
3. CPA Canada Handbook. Available :
a) through the University's on campus labs at http://edu.knotia.ca
b) through the Library website, under Databases, under CPA Standards and
Guidance Collection.
4. ISACA COBIT Student Book which will be posted on Blackboard Learn.
5. Various articles on Auditing AIS from CPA Magazine, etc which will be
posted on Blackboard Learn.
Other Information
COURSE APPROACH
The approach of this course involves cooperative learning based on cases, readings, lectures,
and discussions. Class participation is a must. Attendance may be taken during class.
PROFESSIONAL DEPORTMENT
Since all students are aspiring to become accountants (chartered, certified and management), it is
expected that each students behaviour will meet professional standards at all times including the
highest standards of ethical behaviour. At a minimum, this requires students to avoid all types of
academic dishonesty. Please see attachments at the end of the course outline regarding academic
integrity and plagiarism. In addition, 10% of your participation marks will be deducted for
each instance of unprofessional behaviour such as talking in class, or failing to contribute
to your group projects.
Page 5
Course Schedule
Wk Week
of
1
Sept.
7th
Sept.
14th
Sept.
21st
Sept.
28th
Oct.
5th
Homework due/
Important Dates
Presentations
Due
Homework Tim
Horton exercise slides
Homework
Case 2-26
pp. 70-71
Groups Due
Homework
Exercise 5-1 (on
slide)
Cases
Assigned to
Groups
Group Project
Topics Due
Homework
Problem 6-12
p. 201, Case 6-21
p. 205 & Problem
7-16 pp. 240-241
Chapter 10 Computer
Homework
Controls for Organizations
Case 9-19 p. 309
and Accounting Information
and Case 9-20
Systems
pp. 309-310
Review for Mid-term Exam
Oct.
12th
Chapter 11 Computer
Crime, Fraud, Ethics and
Privacy
Page 6
Homework
Case 1 (2.2
Case 10-21 pp. 343Apple Inc)
344 and Fraud Case Case 2 (4.5
Xerox Corp)
Oct.
17th
Mid-Term Exam
Chapters 1- 10
Oct.
19th
Chapter 11 Computer
Crime, Fraud, Ethics and
Privacy
Oct.
26th
Nov.
2nd
Nov.
9th
Computerized Auditing
Using ACL)
Case 7 (4.2
Comptronix
Corp)
Case 8 (5.4 St.
James Clothiers)
Case 9 (9.2
Henrico Retail)
Case 10 (5.5
Collins Harp)
10 Nov.
16th
TBD
Chapter 12 Information
Technology Auditing
9:00-12:00
Case 3 (5.6
Sarbox Scooter)
Case 4 (2.1
Your1040
Return)
Review of midterm
12 Nov.
30th
Group Projects
Due
Group presentations
Group presentations
Page 7
Group Evaluations
All members of a team are equally responsible for the work submitted. However, each team
member will have the opportunity to evaluate the performance of his/her team-mates. This will
be done by filling in a confidential evaluation form (see Appendix A). Each student must submit
to me the Peer Evaluation Form in a sealed envelope at the beginning of the class their Group
Case Presentation is due and at the beginning of the class the Group Project is due. The mark
assigned to the team for any presentations and written work will be proportionally scaled based
on the individuals peer evaluation to obtain the individuals mark. In an ideal situation, your
individual mark will be the same as your team mark (no one can get higher than the team mark).
Otherwise, it is scaled downwards based upon the Peer Evaluation. For example, If your team
received the mark M for the team work, and you receive a Peer Evaluation of P1, P2, P3 and P4
from your team members, your individual mark would be M*(P1+P2+P3+P4)/4. Submission of
a Peer Evaluation is mandatory. Failure to submit your Peer Evaluation on time will result
in a mark of zero (0%) for all of your team. See Appendix A at the end of the Course Outline
for a copy of the Peer Evaluation Form.
Page 8
Appendix A
ADM 4346A AIS Auditing
Fall 2015
Peer Evaluations
All members of a team are equally responsible for the work submitted. However, each team
member will have the opportunity to evaluate the performance of his/her team-mates. This will
be done by filling in a confidential evaluation form. Each student must submit to me the Peer
Evaluation Form in a sealed envelope at the beginning of the class their Group Case Presentation
is due and at the beginning of the class the Group Project is due. The mark assigned to the team
for any presentations and written work will be proportionally scaled based on the individuals
peer evaluation to obtain the individuals mark. In an ideal situation, your individual mark will
be the same as your team mark (no one can get higher than the team mark). Otherwise, it is
scaled downwards based upon the Peer Evaluation. For example, if your team received the mark
M for the team work, and you receive a Peer Evaluation of P1, P2, P3 and P4 from your team
members, your individual mark would be M*(P1+P2+P3+P4)/4. Submission of a Peer
Evaluation is mandatory. Failure to submit your Peer Evaluation on time will result in a
mark of zero (0%) for all of your team.
The objective of peer evaluations is to ensure that your concerns/comments regarding the
contributions of your team members are heard. In a team in harmony, with workload fairly
distributed among all team members, each member will receive 100% from his/her peers.
Some of the factors you can consider in evaluating your team members are:
Presence and punctuality during group meetings.
Accepting a fair share of the team workload and actively participating.
Preparation (readings, documentation, research, solutions, report writing and
presentation).
The team member exceeded/met/did not meet your expectations.
Would you like to work with the team member again?
Instruction:
Fill out the form on the next page, date it, sign it, and submit it to me in person in a sealed
envelope at the beginning of the class that it is due.
Note on Confidentiality
The information on this form is protected and will remain confidential after it is submitted. The
form will be destroyed after the official marks are finalized and announced by the University
authorities.
Page 9
Note on Confidentiality
The information on this form is protected and will remain confidential after it is submitted. The
form will be destroyed after the official marks are finalized and announced by the University
authorities.
My Name:
My Student ID #:
My Team # (1-10):
Names of my Team-Mates
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Date: ..
Signature: .
Page 10
Appendix B
ADM 4346A AIS Auditing
Fall 2015
Case Presentation Marking Key
Factor
Grade
Case Overview
Total
/10
appropriate use of
overheads/slides/board
clarity
quality of visual aids
grammar & spelling
Class involvement
/20
clarity of ideas
use of examples when
appropriate
speaking style
time management
able to engage audience
professionalism
creativity
Visual aids
/20
Presentation/Style
/20
completeness
focus on key issues
demonstrated understanding
Analysis/ Interpretation/
Conclusions
Comments
/30
/100
Page 11
Appendix C
Comments
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Page 12
handing in an assignment that was not authored, in whole or in part, by the student;
submitting the same assignment in more than one course, without the written consent of
the professors concerned
In recent years, the development of the Internet has made it much easier to identify academic
plagiarism. The tools available to your professors allow them to trace the exact origin of a text
on the Web, using just a few words.
In cases where students are unsure whether they are at fault, it is their responsibility to consult
the Universitys Web site at the following address, where you will find resources, tips and tools
for writing papers and assignments:
Academic Integrity Webpage
Persons who have committed or attempted to commit (or have been accomplices to) academic
fraud will be penalized. Here are some examples of the academic sanctions, which can be
imposed:
Please be advised that professors have been formally advised to report every suspected case of
academic fraud. In most cases of a first offence of academic fraud, the sanction applied to
students who have been found guilty is an F for the course with an additional three credits
added to their program requirements. Repeat offenders are normally expulsed from the School of
Management.
Finally, the Telfer School of Management asks that students sign and submit with their
deliverables the Personal Ethics Agreement form. Two versions of this form exist: one for
individual assignments, and one for group submissions. Assignments will not be accepted or
marked if this form is not submitted and signed by all authors of the work. We hope that by
making this personal commitment, all students will understand the importance the School places
on maintaining the highest standards of academic integrity.
Page 13
__________________________
Signature
Date
______________________________
__________________________
Student Number
______________________________
__________________________
Signature
Date
______________________________
__________________________
Student Number
______________________________
__________________________
Signature
Date
______________________________
__________________________
Student Number
______________________________
__________________________
Signature
Date
______________________________
__________________________
Student Number
______________________________
__________________________
Signature
Date
______________________________
__________________________
Student Number
Page 14
______________________________
__________________________
Signature
Date
______________________________
__________________________
Student Number
Page 15
Page 16