EME

2026: Engineering Design II

Design Project (50%)

Select one of the following tasks for your design project.
a. Many retail stores sell products in vacuum sealed packaging. Although this type of
packaging is strong, easy to set in a display, discourages theft, and allows the consumer
to easily view the product, there are a few problems. Many times it is very difficult to
open these packages, and often the methods used can be dangerous. The packaging itself
is very sharp and may cause injury to the consumer. It is also poses a threat to the
environment as it is simply tossed in the trash and ends up in landfills. Use the design
process to:
i. design and model a pocket sized tool that anyone ages 7 to 100 could use to open
vacuum sealed packaging. Since you are accommodating a wide age range, you
are not allowed to design anything sharp, anything with fire, anything that uses
heat, or anything that can cause potential harm/injury to the user. The tool should
be estimated to cost less than RM100 or USD25, OR
ii. redesign the packaging to make it easier to open and more environmentally
pleasing without losing the positive attributes the retailer enjoys as mentioned
above. This would require you to redesign the entire packaging system, device or
machine. Your solution should be estimated to cost less than RM20,000 or
USD4,900.
b. The state of Selangor has become overpopulated with stray cats. The animals are
becoming a nuisance to the people in the state and the population must be decreased.
Since you are the President of the local animal rights group, you must find a humane way
to capture and relocate the animals. The city engineer has asked your team to design a
trap that will capture as many cats as possible without causing physical harm. The traps
must not be man or electric powered, but can and should be fully mechanical. Your trap
can adopt the utilisation of a mechanical wind-up toy, but you are not restricted to use
only this method. Your solution should be estimated to cost less than RM100 or USD25.
No physical prototype is required for the project, but you are expected to create a 3D model
using CAD software along with detailed drawings, prepare for oral presentations and a report.
Your design MUST involve complex engineering analysis that befits LO5 (Learning Outcome
No. 5), which is to design solution for engineering system, component, or processes, with
proper engineering analysis (cognitive: creating level 6). Hence, by no means are you
allowed to base the given task on simplistic designs with little engineering analysis involved.
Although there may be existing solutions available in the market, you are not allowed to follow
them 100%. You are to conduct a benchmarking exercise, compare the existing solutions and
NPK/GK

Page 1

EME 2026: Engineering Design II

adopt traits or features to create a new and innovative solution. If existing parts or machines are
used to support your overall design, you are supposed to design them and do the necessary
calculations for them, and not just declare that you buy them and plug and play them into your
design.
The ideas of your design need not be solely based on the syllabus of Engineering Design II
(Springs, Drive Transmissions, Gears etc). The ideas of your design can also incorporate
complex engineering analysis from different areas in mechanical engineering (Applied Statics,
Applied Dynamics, Engineering Graphics, Strength of Materials, Engineering Design I, etc).
This project is a team project and should include no more and no less than 5 students per team.
The teams will be divided within your respective tutorial groups. As such, nobody is allowed to
switch tutorial groups. If you are not able to make it for your tutorial/studio sessions, please
make sure you have approval from FET office to be absent during your tutorial session and do
not switch to another forthcoming tutorial group after your session. Any team who has more or
less than 5 members will be penalised.
For this project, each team is required to present for 10 minutes for the following occasions:
1. Progress Report Presentation 1 (2.5%) - Chaired by Dr. Ng Poh Kiat
2. Progress Report Presentation 2 (2.5%) - Chaired by Mr. Ganesh
3. Final Report Presentation (5%) - Chaired by both Dr. Ng and Mr. Ganesh
Your presentation will be graded based on a rubrics assessment and it will be worth 10% in total.
At the end of this course, you are required to submit a report which will be worth 40% in total.
The report should be more than 100 pages long (Font type: Times New Roman, Font size: 12,
Line spacing: 1.5 pt, Spacing before/after line: None, Report binding style: Stapled). Please
use the DESIGN PROJECT COVER template provided to your team. All in all, the total
marks for this whole project will be 50% (10% project presentation and 40% project report).
Your project should include the following chapters:
1. Chapter 1: Introduction (7%)
a. Problem definition
b. Root cause analysis
c. Engineering contradictions
d. Benchmarking and conceptualisation
e. Final concept
2. Chapter 2: Complex Engineering Elements (10%)
a. Complex Engineering Analyses (Fundamentals)
NPK/GK

Page 2

EME 2026: Engineering Design II

b. Complex Engineering Analyses (Engineering Design)

c. Other Complex Engineering Analyses (Specialist Knowledge AND/OR
Engineering Practice/Technology AND/OR Research Literature)
3. Chapter 3: Final Design (7%)
a. Final Design (Material Selection and Size Approximations)
b. Final Design (3D Model and Detailed Design)
4. Chapter 4: Conclusion (16%)
a. Sustainability of Solution
b. Cost-Effectiveness of Solution
c. Societal Impact of Solution
d. Environmental Impact of Solution
The studio sessions (as specified in the lecture plan) are to help you with the progress of this
project. Please present your progresses during these sessions and ask SPECIFIC, LOGICAL and
REASONABLE questions that you are sure you need help on during the studio session.
Do not ask us to verify if your design or your method is correct or not! Please do not ask
questions such as "how do I do this project/chapter?", "is it correct if I design it this way", "what
information do I need to get good marks?", "where can I get the formula for this relation?",
"what does this word mean?" or "how do I calculate this?" These are questions you should ask
yourselves and discuss with your team members or use GOOGLE. It is better to do some
background work on the topic first, come up with a draft and then show it to the lecturer.
Before asking a question by e-mail, social media, in class or during consultation, it is suggested
that you do the following:

Try to find an answer by searching the archives of the university's library.

Try to find an answer by searching the Web.
Try to find an answer by reading a handbook, manual, research book or research article.
Try to find an answer by inspection, observation, survey or experimentation.
Try to find an answer by discussing with your team members.

Please be informed that the examiners (Dr. Ng and Mr. Ganesh) have the right to deduct
any amount of marks from your report if it does not adhere to all of the above instructions.
The deadline to submit your design report (according to the lecture plan) is by Week 14 during
your team's respective presentation time. Any team that submits their report after their
presentation will be penalised with the deduction of a substantial amount of marks.

NPK/GK

Page 3

EME2026EngineeringDesignII:AssignmentReportEvaluation(40%)
(Covers*PO4and*PO8)
Chap

1
(Introduction)

CATEGORY
POINTRANGE
ProblemDefinition

Excellent
10to9

Good
8to7

Fair
6to5

24
16

Score

Therewasnoclear
problemdefinition.

10

Marks
(%)
1

Theproblemwasnot
brokendowntoany
subproblems.Avery
briefrootcause
analysiswasdoneto
identifytherootcause
totheproblem.The
rootcauseidentified
waslinkedtothe
engineering
contradiction
statementsinthenext
step.

10

1.5

Usingtherootcauses,45 Usingtherootcauses,34 Usingtherootcauses,23 Usingtherootcauses,

engineeringcontradiction engineeringcontradiction
engineeringcontradiction
12engineering
statementswereformedto statementswereformedto statementswereformed
contradiction
demonstratearangeof todemonstratearangeof
demonstratearangeof
statementswere
conflictingrequirementsbased conflictingrequirements conflictingrequirements formedtodemonstrate
ontherootcausesidentified. basedontherootcauses basedontherootcauses arangeofconflicting
identified.
Theengineeringcontradiction
requirementsbasedon
identified.
statementswerelinkedtothe
therootcauses
benchmarkinganalysisinthe
identified.
nextstep.

10

1.5

Aproblemwasdefinedand Aproblemwasdefined
Thissectionprovideda
buttherewasno
therewasjustabrief
preliminaryideaofwhatthe
explanationontheideaor explanationontheideaor
problemisandsome
backgroundofthe
backgroundofthe
background.
problem.
problem.

RootCauseAnalysis Theproblemwasbrokendown Theproblemwasbroken Theproblemwasbroken

downto23sub
downto34subproblems.
to45subproblems.A
problems.Abriefroot
Adetailedrootcause
detailedrootcauseanalysis
causeanalysiswasdone
analysiswasdoneto
wasdonetoidentify45major
identify34majorroot toidentify23majorroot
rootcausestothe45sub
causestothe23sub
causestothe34sub
problems.Therootcauses
identifiedwerelinkedtothe problems.Therootcauses problems.Therootcauses
identifiedwerelinkedto identifiedwerelinkedto
engineeringcontradiction
theengineering
theengineering
statementsinthenextstep.
contradictionstatements contradictionstatements
inthenextstep.
inthenextstep.

Engineering
Contradictions

Poor
4to0

TotalPO4(%)
TotalPO8(%)

POCovered

ComplexEngineering

KnowledgeProfile

PO4Design Familiarityofissues
(WP4:Involve
solutionsfor
infrequently
complex
engineering encounteredissues)
problemsthat
meetspecified
needswith
Rangeofconflicting
relevant
requirements(WP2:
considerations Involvewideranging
oftheirimpacts
orconflicting
insociety
technical,engineering
andotherissues)

Rangeofconflicting
requirements(WP2:
Involvewideranging
orconflicting
technical,engineering
andotherissues)

Chap

CATEGORY
POINTRANGE

Good
8to7

Fair
6to5

Poor
4to0

Benchmarkingand Abenchmarkinganalysiswas Asimplebenchmarking Nobenchmarkinganalysis Nobenchmarking

Conceptualisation done.Thereweremorethan5 analysiswasdone.There wasdone.Therewerejust analysiswasdone.Only
oneconceptwas
uniqueconceptsproposed. were34uniqueconcepts 23conceptspresented.
Constraintsandadvantagesof presented.Constraintsand Theconceptswerenot presented.Constraints
andadvantagesof
unique.Constraintsand
advantagesofeach
eachconceptwere
severalconceptwere
advantagesofeach
conceptwerebriefly
systematicallydiscussed.A
notpresented.No
conceptwerebriefly
discussed.Asimple
properconceptevaluation
techniquewasdonepriorto evaluationtechniquewas discussed.Noevaluation evaluationtechnique
donepriortotheselection techniquewasdoneprior wasdonepriortothe
theselectionof23best
selectionforbest
totheconceptselection.
of2bestconcepts.A
concepts.Adetailedcost
concepts.Therewasno
Therewasnocost
simplecostanalysisonthe
analysisonthe23best
costanalysis.There
analysis.Therewasno
bestconceptwas
conceptswasprepared.The
wasnointegrationof
integrationofbest
prepared.Thefinal
finalconceptgenerated
bestfeaturesandthe
featuresandthefinal
conceptgenerated
resultedfromtheintegration
finalconceptgenerated
conceptgenerated
resultedfromthe
ofbestfeaturesfromthe23
wasfromonlyone
resultedfromthe
integrationofbestfeatures
bestconceptsselected.
concept.
fromthe2bestconcepts selectionofoneofthe
concepts.
selected.

10

Marks
(%)
1.5

Adraftofthefinalconcept Adraftofthefinalconcept Aneatsketchofthefinal Aroughsketchofthe

conceptwasprepared.
wasappropriately
wasappropriatelyprepared.
finalconceptwas
Therewasabrief
prepared.Therewasa
Therewasadetailed
prepared.Therewas
discussiononhowthe
discussiononhowthesolution discussiononhowthe
littletonodiscussion
solutionmeetscertain
meetscertainspecifiedneeds solutionmeetscertain
onhowthesolution
specifiedneedswith
specifiedneedswith
withrelevantconsiderationof
meetscertainspecified
relevantconsiderationof relevantconsiderationof needswithrelevant
theirimpactsinsociety.
theirimpactsinsociety.
theirimpactsinsociety. considerationoftheir
impactsinsociety.

10

1.5

Littletonocomplex
engineering
analyses/calculations
thatinvolvesystematic
engineering
fundamentalsare
presentedinorderto
supporttheoriesand
applicatonsappliedin
solution.

10

3.5

FinalConcept

2
(Complex
Engineering
Elements)

Excellent
10to9

Complex
Engineering
Analyses
(Fundamentals)

Detailedcomplexengineering Satisfactoryamountof Briefcomplexengineering

analyses/calculationsthat
complexengineering
analyses/calculationsthat
involvesystematic
involvesystematicengineering analyses/calculationsthat
engineeringfundamentals
involvesystematic
fundamentalsarepresentedin
ordertosupporttheoriesand engineeringfundamentals arepresentedinorderto
supporttheoriesand
applicatonsappliedinsolution. ispresentedinorderto
applicatonsappliedin
supporttheoriesand
solution.
applicatonsappliedin
solution.

Score

POCovered

ComplexEngineering

KnowledgeProfile

Depthofanalysis
required(WP3:Have
noobvioussolution
andrequireabstract
thinking,originalityin
analysistoformulate
suitablemodels)

PO4Design
solutionsfor
complex
engineering
problemsthat
meetspecified
needswith
relevant
considerations
oftheirimpacts
insociety

DepthofKnowledge WK3:Asystematic,theorybased
formulationofengineering
Required(WP1:
Cannotberesolved fundamentalsrequiredinthe
engineeringdiscipline.
withoutindepth
engineering
knowledgeatthe
levelofWK3which
allowsa
fundamentalsbased,
firstprinciples
analyticalapproach).

Chap

CATEGORY
POINTRANGE

Excellent
10to9

Good
8to7

Fair
6to5

Poor
4to0

Nocomplex
Detailedcomplexengineering Satisfactoryamountof Briefcomplexengineering
engineering
analyses/calculationsthat
complexengineering
analyses/calculationsthat
involveengineeringdesignare analyses/calculationsthat involveengineeringdesign analyses/calculations
thatinvolve
presentedinordertosupport involveengineeringdesign arepresentedinorderto
supporttheoriesand engineeringdesignare
ispresentedinorderto
theoriesandapplicatons
presentedinorderto
applicatonsappliedin
supporttheoriesand
appliedinsolution.
supporttheoriesand
solution.
applicatonsappliedin
applicatonsappliedin
solution.
solution.

10

Marks
(%)
3.5

Detailedcomplexengineering Satisfactoryamountof Briefcomplexengineering

Complex
analyses/calculationsthat
complexengineering
analyses/calculationsthat
Engineering
involvespecialist
Analyses(Specialist involvespecialistknowledge analyses/calculationsthat
knowledgearepresented
involvespecialist
arepresentedinorderto
Knowledge)
inordertosupport
knowledgeispresentedin
supporttheoriesand
applicatonsappliedinsolution. ordertosupporttheories theoriesandapplicatons
AND/OR
appliedinsolution.
andapplicatonsappliedin
solution.

Nocomplex
engineering
analyses/calculations
thatinvolvespecialist
knowledgeare
presentedinorderto
supporttheoriesand
applicatonsappliedin
solution.

10

Detailedcomplexengineering Satisfactoryamountof Briefcomplexengineering

analyses/calculationsthat
complexengineering
analyses/calculationsthat
involveengineering
involveengineeringpractice analyses/calculationsthat
practice(technology)are
involveengineering
(technology)arepresentedin
presentedinorderto
ordertosupporttheoriesand practice(technology)is
supporttheoriesand
presentedinorderto
applicatonsappliedinsolution.
applicatonsappliedin
supporttheoriesand
solution.
applicatonsappliedin
solution.

Nocomplex
engineering
analyses/calculations
thatinvolve
engineeringpractice
(technology)are
presentedinorderto
supporttheoriesand
applicatonsappliedin
solution.

Complex
Engineering
Analyses
(Engineering
Design)

Complex
Engineering
Analyses
(Engineering
Practice/
Technology)
AND/OR

Score

POCovered

ComplexEngineering

KnowledgeProfile

WK4:Engineeringspecialist
DepthofKnowledge
knowledgethatprovides
Required(WP1:
theoreticalframeworksand
Cannotberesolved
bodiesofknowledgeforthe
withoutindepth
acceptedpracticeareasinthe
engineering
knowledgeatthe engineeringdiscipline;muchisat
levelofWK4which theforefrontofthediscipline.
allowsa
fundamentalsbased,
firstprinciples
analyticalapproach).

DepthofKnowledge WK5:Knowledgethatsupports
Required(WP1:
engineeringdesigninapractice
Cannotberesolved
area.
withoutindepth
engineering
knowledgeatthe
levelofWK5which
allowsa
fundamentalsbased,
firstprinciples
analyticalapproach).

DepthofKnowledge WK6:Knowledgeofengineering
practice(technology)inthe
Required(WP1:
Cannotberesolved practiceareasintheengineering
discipline.
withoutindepth
engineering
knowledgeatthe
levelofWK6which
allowsa
fundamentalsbased,
firstprinciples
analyticalapproach).

Chap

CATEGORY
POINTRANGE

Excellent
10to9

Good
8to7

Fair
6to5

Detailedcomplexengineering Satisfactoryamountof Briefcomplexengineering

Complex
analyses/calculationsthat
complexengineering
analyses/calculationsthat
Engineering
Analyses(Research involveresearchliteratureare analyses/calculationsthat involveresearchliterature
presentedinordertosupport involveresearchliterature arepresentedinorderto
Literature)
supporttheoriesand
ispresentedinorderto
theoriesandapplicatons
applicatonsappliedin
supporttheoriesand
appliedinsolution.
solution.
applicatonsappliedin
solution.

3
(FinalDesign)

Poor
4to0

A3Dmodelwasshownalong
withdetailed2D
drawings/plansusingaCAD
software.Thedrawingsare
practicalandcanbeeasily
followedforfurther
fabricationandmanufacturing
activity.

Onlydetailed2Ddrawings
orplanswerepresented
usingCADsoftware.The
drawingsarepracticaland
canbeeasilyfollowedfor
furtherfabricationand
manufacturingactivity.

Marks
(%)

Noproperdesign
Onlysimple2Ddrawings
oronlyasingle3Dmodel drawingsorplanswere
presented(ortheones
waspresented.The
presenteddonot
drawingsarenotdetailed
butcanstillbereferredto reflectdetaileddesign).
forfabricationpurposes. Thedrawingsarenot
detailedandcannotbe
referredtofor
fabricationpurposes.

POCovered

ComplexEngineering

KnowledgeProfile

DepthofKnowledge WK8:Engagementwithselected
knowledgeintheresearch
Required(WP1:
literatureofthediscipline.
Cannotberesolved
withoutindepth
engineering
knowledgeatthe
levelofWK8which
allowsa
fundamentalsbased,
firstprinciples
analyticalapproach).

Nocomplex
engineering
analyses/calculations
thatinvolveresearch
literatureare
presentedinorderto
supporttheoriesand
applicatonsappliedin
solution.

Thematerialselection
Therewasasimple
Therewasasimple
Therewasareliablematerial
FinalDesign
(MaterialSelection selectionprocesscarriedout. materialselectionprocess materialselectionprocess processwaspoorly
done.Size
carriedout.Size
carriedout.Size
Amodeling/simulationwas
andSize
approximationswere
Approximations) donetocheckoutthefunction approximationsweredone approximationswere
poorlyestimated.No
donetosatisfythe
tosatisfytheproduct
andspatialconstraints.Size
dimensionsor
productdesign
approximationsweredoneto designspecifications.Only
tolerancesdetermined.
specifications.Only
approximatedimensions
satisfytheproductdesign
approximatedimensions
andtoleranceswere
specifications.Theexact
andtoleranceswere
determined.
dimensionsandtolerances
determined.
weredetermined.
FinalDesign
(3DModeland
DetailedDesign)

Score

10

3.5

10

3.5

Depthofanalysis
PO4Design
solutionsfor required(WP3:Have
noobvioussolution
complex
engineering andrequireabstract
problemsthat thinking,originalityin
meetspecified analysistoformulate
suitablemodels)
needswith
relevant
considerations
oftheirimpacts
insociety

DepthofKnowledge WK5:Knowledgethatsupports
engineeringdesigninapractice
Required(WP1:
area.
Cannotberesolved
withoutindepth
engineering
knowledgeatthe
levelofWK5which
allowsa
fundamentalsbased,
firstprinciples
analyticalapproach).

Chap

4
(Conclusion)

CATEGORY
POINTRANGE

Excellent
10to9

Good
8to7

Fair
6to5

Poor
4to0

Nodesignfor
Onlyafewdesignfor
Designfor
Designformanufacturability
manufacturability
manufacturability
manufacturability
guidelineswereheavilyused
guidelineswereused.
guidelineswereused.
guidelineswere
(Example:minimisingtotal
Solutionhaspoor
Solutionhaspoor
numberofparts,standardising moderatelyused.Solution
durabilityand
components,usingcommon ismoderatelydurableand durabilityandendurance.
parts,designingpartstobe hasamoderatecapacityto Thissectionindirectly endurance.Thissection
endureharshcondition addressesthesustainable onlypresentsgeneral
multifunctional,designing
informationon
impactofthesolution,
whichleadtocorrosion,
partsfortheeaseof
sustainability.
withsomegeneral
wearandtear,etc.This
fabrication,avoidingtight
informationon
tolerances).Solutionisvery sectiondirectlyaddresses
sustainability.
thesustainableimpactof
durableandhasahigh
thesolution,withsome
capacitytoendureharsh
generalinformationon
conditionswhichleadto
sustainability.
corrosion,wearandtear,etc.
Thissectiondirectlyaddresses
thesustainableimpactofthe
solution.

10

Marks
(%)
4

CostEffectiveness Detailedbillofmaterialsand Simplebillofmaterialsand Thebillofmaterialsand Nobillofmaterialsand

estimatedcostweredone estimatedcostwere
estimatedcostwere
ofSolution
estimatedcostwereprepared.
done.Totalestimated
inasloppyand
prepared.Totalestimated
Totalestimatedcostof
solutionislessthan50%of costofsolutionislessthan unstructuredmanner. costofsolutionismore
Totalestimatedcostof thantargettedcostset
targettedcostsetin
targettedcostsetin
assignmentquestion.This assignmentquestion.This solutionissameasthe inassignmentquestion.
Thissectiononly
targettedcostsetin
sectiondirectlyaddressesthe sectiondirectlyaddresses
thecosteffectivenessof assignmentquestion(with
costeffectivenessofthe
presentsgeneral
thesolution,withsome +/5units).Thissection informationoncost
solution.
indirectlyaddressesthe
generalinformationon
effectiveness.
costeffectivenessofthe
costeffectiveness.
solution,withsome
generalinformationon
costeffectiveness.

10

SocietalImpactof Solutionsimportancetothe Solutionsimportanceto Verybriefexplanationson Noimportanceto

Solution
societyisstronglyjustifiedand thesocietyismoderately solution'simportanceto societyisjustifiedor
societyisjustified.This explained.Thissection
justifiedandbriefly
thoroughlyexplained
onlypresentsgeneral
sectionindirectly
(Example:Solution'sabilityto explained.Thissection
addressesthesocietal informationonsocietal
directlyaddressesthe
improvesafety,healthcare,
impact.
impactofthesolution,
societalimpactofthe
productivity,technology,
withsomegeneral
solution,withsome
qualityoflifeetc).Thissection
informationonsocietal
directlyaddressesthesocietal generalinformationon
impact.
societalimpact.
impactofthesolution.

10

Sustainabilityof
Solution

Score

POCovered

ComplexEngineering

KnowledgeProfile

PO8a
Extentofstakeholder
Understandthe involvementand
importanceof
conflicting
sustainability requirements(WP6:
Involvediverse
groupsof
stakeholderswith
widelyvaryingneeds)

PO8band
cost
effectivenessin
designand
developmentof
professional
engineering
solutions,and

PO8ctheir
impactsin
societal

Chap

CATEGORY
POINTRANGE

Excellent
10to9

Environmental
ImpactofSolution

Solutionisjustifiedtohave5
ormorepositiveimpactsto
theenvironment.Thissection
directlyaddressesthe
environmentalimpactofthe
solution.

Good
8to7

Fair
6to5

Poor
4to0

Score

Therewerenopositive
Only1positive
Solutionisjustifiedtohave
morethan2to3positive environmentalimpactwas environmentalimpacts
justifiedfromthesolution. justifiedfromthe
impactstothe
solution.Thissection
environment.Thissection Thissectionindirectly
onlypresentsgeneral
addressesthe
directlyaddressesthe
informationon
environmentalimpactof environmentalimpactof
thesolution,withsome environmentalimpact.
thesolution,withsome
generalinformationon
generalinformationon
environmentalimpact.
environmentalimpact.

Marksperchapter=(Scoreofchapter)/10*(Marksofchapter)%

Total

10

Marks
(%)
4

POCovered

ComplexEngineering

PO8dand
environmental
contexts

40

*PO4Designsolutionsforcomplexengineeringproblemsthatmeetspecifiedneedswithrelevantconsiderationsoftheirimpactsinsociety
*PO8Understandtheimportanceofsustainabilityandcosteffectivenessindesignanddevelopmentofprofessionalengineeringsolutions,andtheirimpactsinsocietalandenvironmentalcontexts

KnowledgeProfile

EME2026 Engineering Design II: Assessment Rubrics for Presentation (10%)

Covers *PO11

Final Presentation: Overall marks = (Total Score)/50*5%

Type of
Assessment

Classification
Marks

Excellent
9 - 10

Good
7-8

Assessment
on
Presentation

Presentation
Skills

Very smooth presentation

by presenter, thorough
explanation and strong
examples provided, no
reference to notes, good eye
contact

Smooth presentation by
presenter, explanation of
studies with some examples
provided, no reference to
notes

Smooth presentation by
Words are not clear, no
presenter, some explanation explanation on the study,
provided, little reference to always looking into notes
notes

Content of
Presentation

The direction leading to the

main topic is very clear. The
presentation flow is
excellent. The materials and
information are detailed and
thoroughly presented

There is a clear direction

leading to the main topic.
The presentation flow is
consistent. Sufficient
amount of materials and
information are presented

There is a moderately clear

direction that leads to the
main topic, but the
presentation flow is
inconsistent. The materials
presented are moderately
sufficient in information

There is no clear direction that

leads to the main topic.
Presentation flow is
inconsistent and the materials
presented are severely lacking
of information

English
Proficiency
Efficiency of
Presentation

The English proficiency of

the presenters is excellent

The English proficiency of

the presenters is good

The English proficiency of

the presenters is moderate

The English proficiency of the

presenters is poor

Q&A
Performance

Presenter and team members

are able to confidently
answer questions from the
audience with correct and
clear answers

Presenter uses 2 minutes to Presenter uses 2 minutes to Presenter uses less than 2
present and his/her part was present but did not complete minutes to present.
complete.
his/her part.

Presenter and team members

make an effort to answer
questions from the audience
with partially correct
answers

Poor
0-4

Presenter uses less than 1

minute to present. Also, if
presenter is seen to purposely
extend their presentation time
unnecessarily, 0 is given to the
presenter.

Presenter and team members Presenter and team members are

make an effort to answer
totally unable to answer to
questions from the audience questions from the audience
with incorrect answers

Total per individual (50 marks)

Total per individual (2.5% or 5%)

*PO11Functioneffectivelyasanindividual,andasamemberorleaderinateam

10%

Progress Reporting: Overall marks = (Total Score)/50*2.5%

Progress Reporting 1 (2.5%), Progress Reporting 2 (2.5%) and Final Presentation (5%)
Group:
Moderate
5-6

Total PO11 (%)

Score per individual (/50)

Comments

T_[m N[m_:

R_port M[rks:
Chapter

Category

a
Ng
(/10)

b
Ganesh
(/10)

Problem Definition
Root Cause Analysis
Engineering Contradictions
Benchmarking & Conceptualisation
Final Concept
2 (Complex Fundamentals
Engineering Engineering Design
Elements)
Other (Specialist/ Technology/ Literature)
Material Selection & Size Approximations
3 (Final
Design)
3D Model and Detailed Design
Sustainability
4
(Conclusion) Cost-Effectiveness
Societal Impact
Environmental Impact
Report Marks, e (/40 %)

1 (Intro)

c=(a+b)/2
Average
(/10)

d
Weight
(%)
1
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
3.5
3.5
3
3.5
3.5
4
4
4
4

c*d/10
Marks
(%)

PO

PO4
24%

PO8
16%

Tot[l In^ivi^u[l M[rks:

No.

ID

Name

1
2
3
4
5

L_]tur_rs: Dr. Ng PK [n^ Mr. G[n_sh K

f
Presentation,
Ng (/10)

g
h=(f+g)/2
e+h
Presentation, Presentation Total
Ganesh (/10) (10%) PO11 (50%)