Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Xiros Olympia 16498662 Edp323 Backward-Design-Unit-Plan-Template2-1
Xiros Olympia 16498662 Edp323 Backward-Design-Unit-Plan-Template2-1
Focus Curriculum Area (s): Design and Technologies; Arts, Science, Mathematics and English
over 4 weeks
Duration: 8 lessons
apply science, mathematics, arts and technology to create functional, sustainable and attractive designs;
must often use persuasive language to gain support and understanding for their design ideas; and
work collaboratively with others to plan and build their designed structures.
General
Capabilities
(GP)
Ethical Behaviour
ICT
Intercultural
Crosscurriculum
Priorities
(CCP)
Sustainability
Year Level
Content
Descriptors
Literacy
Histories and
Culture
Numeracy
Understanding
Year Level
Achievement
Standards
Knowledge
Skills
Page 5 of 13
LEARNING OUTCOMES:
By the end of this unit of work, students will be able to explain and demonstrate why:
Successful designed solutions need to consider function (practicality), form (attractiveness) and sustainability
The Earth and the Sun create challenges that building designers can address
A working knowledge of angles can affect the usefulness of a designed structure
Combining scientific and mathematical understandings with persuasive language can influence others to adopt a proposed
designed solution
Working in collaboration with others can result in successful solutions to design problems
Page 6 of 13
Task description:
The Summative assessment task takes place over the final two lessons of the unit of work (weeks 3 and 4). It is the culmination of the
students work throughout the unit. Students work in mixed-ability groups of five to design a shade structure for one of five options (bus
stop, light rail platform, infants playground, public barbecue area, and backyard deck). Each option has dimensions and cardinal
directions that can help guide their design decisions. Students have control over how the design is created and presented. Suggestions
include drawing it on paper, using an online drawing tool such as www.tinkercad.com, designing it in Minecraft, or any other method
students believe will clearly show the success of their design. The design is accompanied by a 200 word rationale to persuade the
council (teacher) of its merits. This can be written, spoken (shared by all members of the group where appropriate), presented using
ICT, or in any format that the group members feel is most effective. The design and rationale components are due on Thursday of the
third week of the unit. Following submission of the design and rationale (and the provision of peer and teacher feedback to students) the
groups build models of their designed structures. Children are expected to consider, and where necessary adopt, the peer and student
feedback prior to construction. Once again the students choose how they will build their models. They can use, for example, cardboard,
recycled materials, clay, Lego, matchsticks or any other materials they believe will best represent their structure. The model is due on
Friday of the fourth week of the unit.
Assessment Criteria:
The task is broken into two parts: the design and rationale, and the model construction.
The first part (design and rationale) is assessed against a formative rubric which is made available to, and discussed with, students prior
to commencement of the task. The criteria are: design; creativity; function; sustainability; collaboration; problem-solving; and
persuasion. The assessment links to Design and Technologies processes and production skills (ACTDEP025, Australian Curriculum,
Assessment and Reporting Authority [ACARA], 2016a) and English literacy and creating texts (ACELY1704, ACARA, 2016b).
While the children have the freedom to choose from among five options, their designed solution must meet specified design criteria, as
this reflects real-world practice. All designs must provide users with: protection from the rain; protection from the summer sun at
12.00pm on 22 December; and full sun at 12.00pm (in Sydney). Each design must be imaginative and creative, capture and store
rainfall, and offer a sustainable power source for lighting.
The second part (model construction) is assessed against a summative rubric. This is also made available to the students and discussed
with the class prior to commencing the model construction. This assessment links to Design and Technologies processes and production
skills (ACTDEP028, ACARA, 2016a) and Visual Arts (ACAVAM115, ACARA, 2016c). Importantly, students are encouraged to utilise
feedback from the previous task to guide their decisions about the model. The criteria for this task are: feedback; design; creativity;
function; sustainability; collaboration; and problem-solving. Most of the criteria are deliberately the same in the first and second parts, as
the first part influences the second.
Assessment recording template:
In both parts, a rubric is used. The rubric for the first part (design and rationale) differs slightly to that used in the second part (model
construction) because the first part includes a persuasive text, and the second part expects students to incorporate peer and student
feedback into their final construction. The first part will show how the student groups performed against clearly-explained criteria, but
Page 7 of 13
there will be no marks recorded. Each group shares its design and rationale with another group for written feedback. The teacher then
adds feedback which is specific to the criteria. The rubric for the second part provides for the teacher to award marks for each of the
criteria, plus written feedback.
Feedback:
Following completion and submission of the first part of the assessment (design and rationale), students receive written feedback from a
group of their peers. Peers are encouraged to be specific with their feedback and relate their suggestions to the criteria in the rubric.
Further, peer groups are asked to identify at least two areas of the design and/or rationale that are successful, and to encourage and
support the group they are assessing. With the peer feedback completed, the design and rationale are evaluated by the teacher, who
highlights the groups performance against the criteria. Written suggestions and encouragement are then added to support the groups
learning progress. Importantly, following the peer and teacher feedback, each group responds to the feedback in writing (on the rubric)
and explains how it will or will not be used in the constructions of the model. The second part (model construction) is then assessed by
the teacher who awards marks for each of the criteria, plus written descriptive feedback to each group, and as necessary, to each
student within the group. The teacher then provides descriptive feedback about each of the students that is then forwarded, together
with copies of their work, including photographs of the completed models, to the students parents or caregivers.
Self-assessment:
Between completion of the first part (design and rationale) and commencement of the second part (model construction) of the task, the
children receive descriptive feedback, linked directly to the assessment criteria, from a peer group and their teacher. Students cannot
proceed to the model construction until they have reflected upon the feedback and considered how they can improve upon their work to
that point. Students, in their groups, must contemplate and state in writing how they will incorporate suggested design modifications
into their model. If the students in the group do not feel that any modifications are warranted, they must say so in writing and give
reasons for their answers. Before commencing model construction, the students written reflections and decisions are shared with the
teacher, who is then able to provide immediate feedback about the students thoughts and plan of action. The summative assessment
rubric is shared and discussed with the class before model construction, so that all students are aware of the marking criteria. Notes,
including reflections, kept in the students Group Journals allow for ongoing reflection throughout the task and are examined by the
teacher at the completion of the first and second parts of the task.
Page 8 of 13
Resources
Interactive Whiteboard
Shade shelter
photographs
Internet connectivity
Dinham, J. (2014).
Delivering authentic arts
education (2nd ed.).
South Melbourne, VIC:
Cengage Learning
Homework video:
http://tinyurl.com/qc5v4j
9
K-W-L charts
Video recording devices
(ipads, cameras,
iphones)
Class computers/tablets
Internet connectivity
Manipulatives (tennis
balls, soccer balls,
torches, lamps, paper,
pencils)
Skamp, K. (Ed.). (2012).
Teaching primary
science constructively
(4th ed.). South
Melbourne, VIC:
Cengage Learning.
How has the designer thought about the heat of summer in the
tropical design? How has the designer thought about the cool of
winter in the cold climate design? Consider function and form.
Children work in triads and are encouraged to conduct internet
research to inform their work. They draw diagrams to show how
the tropical home is kept in the shade in summer (shadows), and
how the cold climate home is kept warm in winter (direct
sunlight). They also explore and explain (in writing or verbally)
how the element of colour has been used to improve each homes
functionality. Students record their working drawings, results and
explanations in their Science journals.
Assessment as learning:
After completing parts 1 and 2 of
the task, each group shares its
findings with another group to
compare results. If there are
conflicts, the groups conduct
further research together to find
a solution. The groups then
proceed separately with the
remaining two tasks.
analysis.
Assessment for learning:
The teacher uses the childrens
completed responses to provide
specific oral and written feedback
to each group. The feedback
informs the students as they
progress to the final lessons.
[Lesson 6 assessment
Evaluation/Analysis]
Assessment for learning:
The designs are assessed by a
peer group and the teacher using
a rubric which clearly outlines the
criteria to the students. There is
also criterion for assessing the
persuasive text that accompanies
the design. No marks are
awarded on this rubric. Instead,
the peer group and teacher
provide written feedback, and the
students then decide how they
will use that feedback to make
improvements prior to
proceeding to the next
(summative assessment) task.
Assessment as learning:
The students in each group need
to reflect upon the feedback from
the peer group and their teacher.
They are encouraged to consider
the feedback that might help
them incorporate improvements
to their final product (model
construction). The students
reflections are shared with the
Page 12 of 13
Page 13 of 13