A justiciable controversy refers to a legal issue brought before a court that involves enforceable rights asserted by one party against another under existing laws. The courts are responsible for settling such disputes using their expertise in understanding and applying the law, particularly the Philippine Constitution. In contrast, a political question does not involve legality but rather decision-making by the people, so it is left to the legislative or executive branches rather than the courts, in order to avoid violating separation of powers between the branches.
A justiciable controversy refers to a legal issue brought before a court that involves enforceable rights asserted by one party against another under existing laws. The courts are responsible for settling such disputes using their expertise in understanding and applying the law, particularly the Philippine Constitution. In contrast, a political question does not involve legality but rather decision-making by the people, so it is left to the legislative or executive branches rather than the courts, in order to avoid violating separation of powers between the branches.
A justiciable controversy refers to a legal issue brought before a court that involves enforceable rights asserted by one party against another under existing laws. The courts are responsible for settling such disputes using their expertise in understanding and applying the law, particularly the Philippine Constitution. In contrast, a political question does not involve legality but rather decision-making by the people, so it is left to the legislative or executive branches rather than the courts, in order to avoid violating separation of powers between the branches.
A justiciable controversy refers to a legal issue brought before a court that involves enforceable rights asserted by one party against another under existing laws. The courts are responsible for settling such disputes using their expertise in understanding and applying the law, particularly the Philippine Constitution. In contrast, a political question does not involve legality but rather decision-making by the people, so it is left to the legislative or executive branches rather than the courts, in order to avoid violating separation of powers between the branches.
Also commonly known as a justiciable question here in the
Philippines, a justiciable controversy is basically a query to and decided by a court that involves issues regarding legally demandable and enforceable rights by one party against another party disputing such rights. In more comprehensible terms, it is an issue which the court could answer and decide because of its involved legal aspect. It refers to bringing to court a predicament where, for example, one person or a group of people, asserts a right or number of rights against another that could be settled by referring carefully to existing competent laws. The courts are the ones in charge of settling such kinds of disputes due to their more-than-average competence in the understanding and application of the law, especially of the highest law of the land which is the Philippine Constitution. A justiciable controversy could be compared against a political question, which the latter involves not of the legality of the acts or issues, but of the decision-making power of the people in their sovereign capacity. Political questions are left either to the legislative or the executive branch of the government, and both of the branches have the full discretionary authority to settle these kinds of issues. As a result, the judicial branch of the government cannot decide and answer political questions because of the mere absence of the essence of legality and reference to laws. It cannot have that jurisdiction to settle and it should stay away and not get involved in such disputes that only the peoples wisdom and judgment can render them effective or ineffective. If ever the courts attempt to do so, it would be considered as an encroachment upon the other branches powers and could violate the doctrine of separation of powers. These three branches of the government have their own respective scopes of authority, and the judiciary, being an expert on law interpretation and application, should confine their powers to justiciable questions only.