Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The International Relations Critique On The Movie ARGO
The International Relations Critique On The Movie ARGO
Torayno
International Relations
Important thing to include in this discussion is the fact that US has provoked
the Iranian Revolution. Firstly, it is the state actor of US, its government and CIA that
meddled with the Iranian government when the issue of oil reserves in Iran threatens
the US interests.
At around this period of time, Muhammad Mosaddeq had become leader of a
movement to expel Britain and nationalize the Iranian oil industry. Mohammad Reza
Shah himself appointed Mosaddeq as his Prime Minister in 1951. The result of this
was that the reserves were successfully nationalized and he gained a huge amount
of public support. This irked the capitalist powers of the USA which developed a plan
to overthrow him and had the Shah [Mohamed Reza Pahlavi] returned to power after
only one day in an exile that was imposed by his own demonstrating countrymen. He
then began the White Revolution a move to completely Westernize Iran and pave
the way for a liberal economic policy (ibid).
How exactly did US gives an affront to democracy? How did this state, who in
this way, has been the start of the lack of equilibrium as posited by the balance of
power in international relations?
To overview the scenario, America, through Britain had certain hegemony with
respect to Iranian oil reserves. So when the democratically-elected Mosaddegh
conservatively sought to nationalize British reserves, America was aghast. Again
being true to its nature, she launched a massive tirade against the offending country
at all International forums. One of its diplomats was quoted with communicating the
following through a dispatch: Iran today is sick with disease, with poverty,
governmental corruption and bureaucracy. Politics hardly exists and business and
bureaucracy are corrupt and slipshod. Americas next move was an affront to
democracy: the CIA overthrew Mosaddegh and reinstated the Shah (Samantara,
2013).
We can then further understand CIA, as the state actor of and for US. This
action of US, all together appalled the sovereignty of Iran.
Although this immense offense has not intensified for any revolutions yet in
Iran, President Carter has exhausted them and caused student protestors to burst in
anguish when he allowed the ousted Shah to receive medical treatment in the US,
and there goes all the deeper reasons that rise the Hostage Crisis in the US
Embassy.
President Carter President Jimmy Carters decision to allow Irans deposed Shah, a
pro-Western autocrat who had been expelled from his country some months before,
to come to the United States for cancer treatment. However, the hostage-taking was
about more than the Shahs medical care: it was a dramatic way for the student
revolutionaries to declare a break with Irans past and an end to American
interference in its affairs.