William Sims, a naval officer, innovated a new method of mounting guns that allowed for continuous aim and fire on US Navy ships around 1900. His initial proposals were met with no response, so he garnered external support by writing to the US President. He succeeded in changing the Navy's gun mounting through a combination of chance, resistance to change within the organization, and eventual acceptance pushed by higher authority. The document discusses how innovations are resisted due to personal identification with existing concepts and attitudes, and societies' difficulties adapting to technological change.
William Sims, a naval officer, innovated a new method of mounting guns that allowed for continuous aim and fire on US Navy ships around 1900. His initial proposals were met with no response, so he garnered external support by writing to the US President. He succeeded in changing the Navy's gun mounting through a combination of chance, resistance to change within the organization, and eventual acceptance pushed by higher authority. The document discusses how innovations are resisted due to personal identification with existing concepts and attitudes, and societies' difficulties adapting to technological change.
William Sims, a naval officer, innovated a new method of mounting guns that allowed for continuous aim and fire on US Navy ships around 1900. His initial proposals were met with no response, so he garnered external support by writing to the US President. He succeeded in changing the Navy's gun mounting through a combination of chance, resistance to change within the organization, and eventual acceptance pushed by higher authority. The document discusses how innovations are resisted due to personal identification with existing concepts and attitudes, and societies' difficulties adapting to technological change.
William Sims, a naval officer, innovated a new method of mounting guns that allowed for continuous aim and fire on US Navy ships around 1900. His initial proposals were met with no response, so he garnered external support by writing to the US President. He succeeded in changing the Navy's gun mounting through a combination of chance, resistance to change within the organization, and eventual acceptance pushed by higher authority. The document discusses how innovations are resisted due to personal identification with existing concepts and attitudes, and societies' difficulties adapting to technological change.
American Society going through technological change
US Navy 1900-1902 Innovation: Gun Mounted -> Continuous Aim Firing Why Navy? - Isolated from random influence - Study of a concrete, durable situation William Sims The innovator His steps - No Response - Getting attention and rebuttal - External Support (Wrote to US President) He succeeded by chance There were reluctant to change How to change the society? - Resistance - Identification o Concept (Old design) o Convention (Way of life) o Attitude (act of revolt) - Acceptance (Through agreement or higher authority push) People with entrepreneurial ideas have rebellious spirit. Source of conflict - Identification (satisfaction that prevented from thinking the defects) - Personal identification with a concept, attitude (e.g. Bessemer process) US still not adaptive society