1) The document discusses references to classic literature and how a same-sex marriage ban meets the Equal Protection Clause's requirement of being rationally related to a legitimate state interest according to Abbott's office.
2) It also discusses how a New York City law could only survive under the state constitution's Home Rule Clause if it served a "substantial" state interest without city council approval.
3) Additionally, it talks about how some fail to put the state interest before partisan and personal interests.
1) The document discusses references to classic literature and how a same-sex marriage ban meets the Equal Protection Clause's requirement of being rationally related to a legitimate state interest according to Abbott's office.
2) It also discusses how a New York City law could only survive under the state constitution's Home Rule Clause if it served a "substantial" state interest without city council approval.
3) Additionally, it talks about how some fail to put the state interest before partisan and personal interests.
1) The document discusses references to classic literature and how a same-sex marriage ban meets the Equal Protection Clause's requirement of being rationally related to a legitimate state interest according to Abbott's office.
2) It also discusses how a New York City law could only survive under the state constitution's Home Rule Clause if it served a "substantial" state interest without city council approval.
3) Additionally, it talks about how some fail to put the state interest before partisan and personal interests.
And of state interest to some extent," said Prince Andrew.
View in context Abbott's office contends that a same-sex marriage ban meets the Equal Protection Clause's prescription that laws "be rationally related to a legitimate state interest. Abbott's Office Files Brief Supporting Same-Sex Marriage Ban 4) Without the City Council's approval, however, the law could only survive under the New York State Constitution's Home Rule Clause if it served a "substantial" state interest. New York City taxis and the New York State Legislature: what is left of the state Constitution's Home Rule Clause after the Court of Appeals decision in the HAIL Act case? Therefore they fail to outdo themselves and put the state interest before the partisan and personal interests. The present's future State interest should be protected at every cost but sometimes, media organizations go beyond limits and cause irreparable loss to the state interest, she observed. China to extend support for setting up media university