Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • CSE 627 Fall 15 Course Evaluation

    Uploaded by

    zobelgb
    28 views2 pages
    Gregory Zobel taught a Web 2.0 course with an enrollment of 15 students. Of those students, 7 completed the teaching evaluation, resulting in a 46% response rate. According to the evaluation, students agreed that Professor Zobel was an effective instructor, used class time well, helped students learn, had assignments that helped learning, responded respectfully, communicated clearly, had clear grading criteria, provided timely feedback, and students would recommend the course. The median ratings for all categories was 5.0 on a 5 point scale.

    Original Description:

    Evaluation of my course.

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Gregory Zobel taught a Web 2.0 course with an enrollment of 15 students. Of those students, 7 completed the teaching evaluation, resulting in a 46% response rate. According to the evaluation, students agreed that Professor Zobel was an effective instructor, used class time well, helped students learn, had assignments that helped learning, responded respectfully, communicated clearly, had clear grading criteria, provided timely feedback, and students would recommend the course. The median ratings for all categories was 5.0 on a 5 point scale.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    28 views2 pages

    CSE 627 Fall 15 Course Evaluation

    Uploaded by

    zobelgb
    Gregory Zobel taught a Web 2.0 course with an enrollment of 15 students. Of those students, 7 completed the teaching evaluation, resulting in a 46% response rate. According to the evaluation, students agreed that Professor Zobel was an effective instructor, used class time well, helped students learn, had assignments that helped learning, responded respectfully, communicated clearly, had clear grading criteria, provided timely feedback, and students would recommend the course. The median ratings for all categories was 5.0 on a 5 point scale.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 2

    Teaching Evaluation Summary (Fall 2015)

    Ratings Summary

    Instructor: Zobel, Gregory


    Subject: CSE
    Catalog & Section: 627, 001

    Course Title: WEB 2.0 TEACH/LEARN


    Enrollment: 15 Responses Incl Declines: 7
    (Declined: 0)

    Response
    Rate

    Std
    MeanMedian
    Dev

    5.04.03.02.01.0

    1.0

    Effective instructor

    46%

    4.7

    5.0

    0.4

    5 2 0 0 0 0

    Used time effectively

    46%

    4.6

    5.0

    0.5

    3 2 0 0 0 2

    Helped me to learn

    46%

    4.4

    5.0

    0.7

    4 2 1 0 0 0

    Assignments helped
    learning

    46%

    4.6

    5.0

    0.7

    5 1 1 0 0 0

    Responded respectfully 46%

    4.9

    5.0

    0.3

    6 1 0 0 0 0

    Communicates well

    46%

    4.7

    5.0

    0.4

    5 2 0 0 0 0

    Clear grading criteria

    46%

    4.9

    5.0

    0.3

    6 1 0 0 0 0

    Timely feedback

    46%

    4.6

    5.0

    0.5

    4 3 0 0 0 0

    Available office hours

    46%

    4.3

    4.0

    0.5

    1 2 0 0 0 4

    Would recommend
    course

    46%

    4.6

    5.0

    0.7

    5 1 1 0 0 0

    Scales:
    5.0 - Strongly Agree; 4.0 - Agree; 3.0 - Neutral; 2.0 - Disagree; 1.0 - Strongly
    Disagree; -1.0 - Doesn't Apply;

    You might also like