Professional Documents
Culture Documents
What Are Some Critiques Within The Philosophy of Science of Popper's Principle of Falsifiability?
What Are Some Critiques Within The Philosophy of Science of Popper's Principle of Falsifiability?
(8)PhilosophyofScience:WhataresomecritiqueswithinthephilosophyofscienceofPopper'sprincipleoffalsifiability?Quora
2FOLLOWERS
Lastasked:2Feb,2015
PhilosophyofScience:Whataresomecritiques
withinthephilosophyofscienceofPopper's
principleoffalsifiability?
ReAsk
Follow 2
QUESTIONTOPICS
KarlPopper
DerekLee
Writeyouranswer,oranswerlater
Philosophyof
Science
2Answers
Philosophy
EditTopics
TomMcFarlane,MastersinPhilosophyandReligion
Tomhas80+answersinPhilosophyofScience.
Tomhas3endorsementsinPhilosophy.
QUESTIONSTATS
Followers
Edits
Picknewpeopleandtopicstofollow
andseethebestanswersonQuora.
UpdateYourInterests
RELATEDQUESTIONS
EditBioMakeAnonymous
Falsifiability
Views
There'smoreonQuora...
784
2
Asawaybywhichtodefinewhat'scientific'hypothesesvs'nonscientific'
hypothesesare,thecriterionoffalsifiabilitystatesthatscientifichypothesisare
exactlythosethatarefalsifiable,i.e.,theymakepredictionsthatcan,in
principle,befalsifiedbyexperiment.ThiswassetforthbyPopperasawayto
solvethedemarcationproblembetweenscienceandnonscience.
Onecritiqueisthatfalsifyingatheoryisnotassimpleasismayfirstappear.
TheDuhemQuinethesis pointsoutthatjustbecauseanexperimentalresult
contradictsapredictionofatheory,itdoesnotnecessarilyfollowthattheerror
residesinthetheory.(TheFasterthanlightneutrinoanomaly ,forexample,
contradictedEinstein'stheoryofrelativity,butitdidnotultimatelyfalsifyit
becauseitturnedoutthattherewasanexperimentalerror.Also,the
irregularitiesintheorbitofUranusdidnotfalsifyNewton'stheoryofgravity
becausetheexistenceofNeptune wasnotyetknown.)
Onecannotlogicallyconcludefromamismatchbetweentheoryand
experimentthatthetheoryisnecessarilyfalse.Theerrormaybeduetoany
numberofothercauses,knownorunknown.Forexample,themismatchmay
beduetoexperimentalerror,mistakesincalculatingthepredictionsfromthe
hypothesis,orauxiliaryassumptionsthathavebeenmade.Inaddition,as
pointedoutbyNorwoodRussellHanson ,experimentalfactsthemselvesare
theoryladen.So,wecannevertestatheoryagainst"pure"experimentalfacts,
independentofatheory(e.g.,atheoryusedtounderstandhowthe
experimentalapparatusoperates).Theseassumptionsandconditionsof
testingatheorycanbesonumerousthatfalsifyingatheory,inastrictlylogical
sense,isoftenpracticallyimpossible.
WhatisKarlPopper'sphilosophyof
science?
PhilosophyofScience:Isevolutionary
theoryfalsifiable?
PhilosophyofScience:Istheexistence
ofaliensascientifichypothesis?How
canIfalsifyit?
PhilosophyofScience:Whatarethe
philosophicalramificationsof
Heisenberg'suncertaintyprinciple?
PhilosophyofScience:Whatare
alternativemethodsforthesisevaluation
tothefalsificationcriterionintroducedby
karlpopper?
PhilosophyofScience:Whyarethere
twoversionsoftheAnthropicPrinciple
strongandweak?
Philosophy:Whataresomecritiquesof
thephilosophiesespousedbyAlan
Watts?
PhilosophyofScience:Whataresome
oftheproblemsofscientificmethod?
PhilosophyofScience:Howwasthe
logicalpositivist'sviewofverification
influencedbyHume'sfork?
PhilosophyofScience:Aretherestraight
linesinnature?
MoreRelatedQuestions
Scientiststrytoteaseouttherootcauseofanymismatchbetweentheoryand
experimentbyperformingindependentexperimentsrepeatedlyinvarious
differentwaysbydifferentteams.Iftheirresultsagreewitheachotherbutnot
withthepredictionsofatheory,thenitbecomesmorelikelythatitisthetheory
itselfthatisatfaultthansomeotherassumption.Thisisstillshortoflogical
certainty,however.Thus,inpractice,atheorycannotbefalsifiedbyan
experimentthewayamathematicalpropositioncanbefalsifiedbyasingle
counterexample.
Now,becausefalsifyingtheoriesinpracticeisproblematicandnotclearcut,
thiscreatesaproblemforusingfalsifiabilityasthecriterionfordistinguishing
sciencefromnonscience.Onecanimagine,forexample,aclassofhypotheses
thatareinprinciplefalsifiablebutthatcannotinpracticebefalsifiedby
experiment(e.g.,thehypothesisthatsomewhereintheuniversethereisa
http://www.quora.com/PhilosophyofScience/WhataresomecritiqueswithinthephilosophyofscienceofPoppersprincipleoffalsifiability
1/3
8/25/2015
(8)PhilosophyofScience:WhataresomecritiqueswithinthephilosophyofscienceofPopper'sprincipleoffalsifiability?Quora
teapotorbitingaplanet).Forallpracticalpurposes,thisclassofhypotheses
wouldbenodifferentthanunfalsifiablemetaphysicalspeculations,yetthey
wouldbegiventhestatusofbeingclassifiedas'scientific'hypotheses
nonetheless.Inshort,falsifiabilityseemsnotsufficientlyrestrictive,admitting
as'scientific'somehypothesesthatdonotseemtowarrantsuchclassification.
Ontheotherhand,thereareinstanceswherefalsifiabilityseemstoorestrictive.
Forexample,classicalmechanicshasbeenfalsifiedbutisstillascientific
theory,albeitanapproximateoneonlyvalidwithincertainlimits.Another
exampleisahypothesislikeprotondecaywhich,strictlyspeaking,cannotbe
falsifiedbecausenomatterhowlongonefailedtoobservedecay,itremains
possiblethatitcouldstillhappen.Onecanonlysetstatisticalboundsonit.See
TomMcFarlane'sanswertoDoesaclaimhavetobefalsifiabletobeconsidered
ascientificclaim?andTomMcFarlane'sanswertoAreunfalsifiablequestions
ofanyuseorinteresttoscientificinquiry?
211views6upvotesUpdated8Aug
Upvote
Downvote Comments 1+
Share
PhilJones,Stillfiguringitout
Let'sprefacebysayingthatI'maPopperian.IregardmyselfasaCritical
Rationalistandconsiderthatthisistherightapproachtothinkingabout
thinkingandknowledge.Itresolvesmanyproblemsinepistemologyandoffers
acomprehensiveandethicalwaytoapproachtheworldasanepistemicagent.
BUT...
Popper's"falsificationism"obviouslycan'tdowhatit'snaivelybilledasbeing
abletodo,whichistoputscienceonthe"respectable"basisoflogical
deductionratherthanthelessrespectablelogicalinduction.
Search
Itcan'treallyeliminatesomekindofspeculativeinductive/generalizing
componenttodeliveringourscientificresults.Let'stakeareallysimplistic
example:supposeweconjecturethatallyparticlesfollowtheYLaw.Andso,
ifweseeayparticlethatviolatestheYLawthenweknowthatourYLaw
conjectureisfalsified.
Home
Write
Notifications
Derek
AskQuestion
OK.Buthowdoweknowthatwewerereallyobservingayparticleinthefirst
place?Andnotaverysimilary'particlethatactslikeayinmostcircumstances
butnotthisone?Theansweris,wehavetoconjectureit.Soallour
observationsthatpotentiallykilltheYLawhypothesisare,themselves
dependentonthe"thisisay,notay'"conjecture.AndwhatisTHAT
conjecturebasedon?Probablyonaseriesofpreviousobservationsofthe
particleortheparticlegeneratingapparatuswhichleadustoassumethatit'sa
ygeneratorandnotay'generator.Inotherwords...oninduction.
Thisisjustonewaytophrasetheproblem.Youcanfindthiskindoftakedown
inmorerigourfrompeoplelikeHilaryPutnam .AndI'dguessit'simplicitin
NelsonGoodman.
92views2upvotesWritten2Feb,2015
Upvote
TopStoriesfromYourFeed
TopContentonQuora
TopContentonQuora
TopContentonQuora
Whataresomemindblowingfacts
thatsoundlike'BS',butare
Whataresomeofthebesttravel
locationsthatmostpeoplehave
Whatisapolitewaytosay,
"pleaseonlybringbooksas
http://www.quora.com/PhilosophyofScience/WhataresomecritiqueswithinthephilosophyofscienceofPoppersprincipleoffalsifiability
2/3
8/25/2015
(8)PhilosophyofScience:WhataresomecritiqueswithinthephilosophyofscienceofPopper'sprincipleoffalsifiability?Quora
actuallytrue?
GarimaKakani
1.In2010,whenTokyoOfficialswentto
congratulatetheoldestmaninthecityon
his111thbirthday,theyinsteadfoundhis
skeletalremainsonhisbed.Hehadbeen
deadfor30yearsandthefam...
ReadInFeed
neverheardof?
OlenaPetrosyuk,insanetraveller
(80+countries)onroundtheworld
tripwithWaveuptravel
UpvotedbyKartikMurthy,Ihavetraveled
toover50countries
OriginallyAnswered:Whatisthemostunderrated
traveldestinationwhichturnsoutreallyamazing?
ReadInFeed
presentsforourson"onbirthday
partyinvites?
GayleLaakmannMcDowell,Author:
CrackingtheCodingInterview,
CrackingthePMInterview,Cracking
th...
UpvotedbyMarcBodnick,fatherof3
children
Gaylehas20+answersinChildren.
Forourson'sfirstbirthday,wedidabook
themedparty.Weenclosedanoteinsidethe
invitationsaying:There'sonesmallrequest
ReadInFeed
Thatwon'tbetoohardPleasebringabook
Insteadofacard...
http://www.quora.com/PhilosophyofScience/WhataresomecritiqueswithinthephilosophyofscienceofPoppersprincipleoffalsifiability
3/3