Name(s) : - : Interdisciplinary Presentation 4 3 2 1 Mark Visual Appeal

You might also like

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Name(s): _________________________________

Interdisciplinary Presentation
Visual Appeal

4
The students do an exceptional job at
creating a visually appealing/engaging
presentations.

3
The students do a good job at creating
a visually appealing/engaging
presentations.

There are no errors in spelling,


grammar, punctuation.

There are some errors in spelling,


grammar, punctuation.

The students present the information


in a clear and concise manner.

The presentation is text heavy and


contains significant amount of
information.

2
The presentation is plain
and not very
appealing/engaging.

There are many errors in


spelling, grammar,
punctuation.

1
Students do not use visuals
to present their information.

There are numerous errors


in spelling, grammar,
punctuation.

The presentation is
extremely text heavy

Comprehension
of
Interdisciplinary
Project

Presentation
Skills

Students have extensive knowledge of


given topic. All members of the group
showed clear understanding of
interdisciplinary assignment.

Students show good understanding of


given topic. All member of the group
show good understanding of
interdisciplinary assignment.

Students show evidence of extensive


research through the presentation.

Students show evidence of research


through the presentation.

Exceptional evidence of critical


thinking skills and well thought-out
argument.

Some evidence of critical thinking


skills and well-thought out argument.

Great eye contact

The presentation was very engaging,


fascinating, and held the audiences
full attention.

Eye contact was not maintained well


by the majority of the group members.
The presentation was engaging and
held the audiences attention to a
certain extent.

Students show very little


understanding of given
topic. Few members of the
group showed
understanding of
interdisciplinary
assignment.
Students show very little
evidence of research
through the presentation.
Minor evidence of critical
thinking skills and wellthought out argument.
Eye contact was made by 1
or 2 members of the group.

The presentation was


somewhat engaging and
held the audiences
attention for a few minutes.

Students did not understand


given topic. All members of
the group misunderstood
the interdisciplinary
assignment.

Students show no evidence


of research.

No evidence of criticalthinking skills and wellthought out argument.


Eye contact was not made
by either member of the
group.

The presentation was not


engaging and did it not hold
the audiences attention.

Mark

Content

The presentation was a detailed


description/summary of the groups
findings/argument.

The presentation was good at


describing/summarizing the groups
findings/argument.

The group goes above and beyond to


present their
findings/perspectives/thoughts/argume
nt

The group was good at presenting


their
findings/perspectives/thoughts/argume
nt

Interdisciplinary connections were


extremely clear.

All members of the group were well


prepared and did an excellent job at
describing the information to the class.
Preparedness/
Participation/
Group
Dynamics

Interdisciplinary connections were


clear.

The presentation
somewhat
describes/summarize the
groups findings/argument.

The presentation was weak


and did not
describe/summarize the
groups findings/argument.
There was no evidence of
effort, creativity, and critical
thinking.

Interdisciplinary
connections were clear to a
certain extent.

Interdisciplinary connections
were not clear.

All group members were prepared and


did a good job at describing the
information to the class.

Group members were not


very well prepared and did
an okay job at describing
the information to the class.

Group members were not


unprepared and did not do a
good job at describing the
information to the class.

A few member of the group remained


silent.

The majority of the group


members remained silent.

Only one or two group


members dominated the
conversation.

Total

/
40

You might also like