The document provides a grading guide for evaluating student papers based on four criteria: thesis, organization, evidence/significance, and overall proficiency. For each criterion, descriptors are given for papers that need improvement, are average, and are proficient. For a proficient thesis, it must provide a firm and comprehensive argument established through three clear claims that provide context for discussion. A proficient organization must have properly grouped information that conveys a clear vision of the paper's progression of ideas. And proficient evidence must fully support the thesis through properly cited quotes and significance that demonstrates a deep understanding of the source material and its relevance.
The document provides a grading guide for evaluating student papers based on four criteria: thesis, organization, evidence/significance, and overall proficiency. For each criterion, descriptors are given for papers that need improvement, are average, and are proficient. For a proficient thesis, it must provide a firm and comprehensive argument established through three clear claims that provide context for discussion. A proficient organization must have properly grouped information that conveys a clear vision of the paper's progression of ideas. And proficient evidence must fully support the thesis through properly cited quotes and significance that demonstrates a deep understanding of the source material and its relevance.
The document provides a grading guide for evaluating student papers based on four criteria: thesis, organization, evidence/significance, and overall proficiency. For each criterion, descriptors are given for papers that need improvement, are average, and are proficient. For a proficient thesis, it must provide a firm and comprehensive argument established through three clear claims that provide context for discussion. A proficient organization must have properly grouped information that conveys a clear vision of the paper's progression of ideas. And proficient evidence must fully support the thesis through properly cited quotes and significance that demonstrates a deep understanding of the source material and its relevance.
The document provides a grading guide for evaluating student papers based on four criteria: thesis, organization, evidence/significance, and overall proficiency. For each criterion, descriptors are given for papers that need improvement, are average, and are proficient. For a proficient thesis, it must provide a firm and comprehensive argument established through three clear claims that provide context for discussion. A proficient organization must have properly grouped information that conveys a clear vision of the paper's progression of ideas. And proficient evidence must fully support the thesis through properly cited quotes and significance that demonstrates a deep understanding of the source material and its relevance.
A Grading Guide To The Comprehensive Guide To Comprehensive Concepts
Evidence / Significance
Organization
Thesis
Criteria
Needs Improvement
Average
Proficient
Thesis statement fails to meet the
requirements, lacks clear purpose, claims do not essentially support the argument and / or lacks insight into the subject matter.
Argument is clear and takes a position
while meeting the requirements and introducing the audience to a conversation.
Thesis provides a firm and comprehensive
argument established through three claims. Thesis provides audience with a broad context from which a discussion may be initiated.
Concept Map fails to meet the
requirements, little to no effort exerted in the assignment. Failure to find direction for the paper.
Requirements for organization are met, a
clear and logical direction of ideas is depicted.
Information is substantial and properly grouped,
a concept of the papers organization is envisioned. There is a coherent and excellent progression of ideas.
Evidence fail to provide thesis with proper
support, information contains improper or lack citation, evidence provides little to no relation to the argument. Information is incoherent
Evidence supports the claim, ideas are
well developed and thought provoking.
Evidence provides thesis with substantial
support, paraphrases and quotes are properly cited, Significance exemplifies the students proper understanding of the text and its relation to the argument. Ideas are ample and elaborate.