Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Daniel T. Li: Flagpole Footing Design Based On Chapter 18 Both IBC & UBC Input Data & Design Summary

    Uploaded by

    JustinCharlesAmor
    138 views1 page
    The document describes the design of a flagpole footing based on lateral force, pole height, footing diameter, and soil bearing capacity. It provides input parameters including a lateral force of 1.11 k, pole height of 19.68 ft, proposed footing diameter of 0.5 ft, and soil bearing capacity of 1.27 ksf/ft. Through an iterative analysis, it determines that a 0.5 ft diameter footing with a depth of 7.01 ft is sufficient to restrain the flagpole laterally.

    Original Description:

    Flagpole Design

    Original Title

    Flagpole

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document describes the design of a flagpole footing based on lateral force, pole height, footing diameter, and soil bearing capacity. It provides input parameters including a lateral force of 1.11 k, pole height of 19.68 ft, proposed footing diameter of 0.5 ft, and soil bearing capacity of 1.27 ksf/ft. Through an iterative analysis, it determines that a 0.5 ft diameter footing with a depth of 7.01 ft is sufficient to restrain the flagpole laterally.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    138 views1 page

    Daniel T. Li: Flagpole Footing Design Based On Chapter 18 Both IBC & UBC Input Data & Design Summary

    Uploaded by

    JustinCharlesAmor
    The document describes the design of a flagpole footing based on lateral force, pole height, footing diameter, and soil bearing capacity. It provides input parameters including a lateral force of 1.11 k, pole height of 19.68 ft, proposed footing diameter of 0.5 ft, and soil bearing capacity of 1.27 ksf/ft. Through an iterative analysis, it determines that a 0.5 ft diameter footing with a depth of 7.01 ft is sufficient to restrain the flagpole laterally.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    Daniel

    T. Li

    PROJECT :
    CLIENT :
    JOB NO. :
    Flagpole Footing Design Based on Chapter 18 both IBC & UBC

    PAGE :
    DESIGN BY :
    REVIEW BY :

    DATE :

    INPUT DATA & DESIGN SUMMARY


    IS FOOTING RESTRAINED @ GRADE LEVEL ? (1=YES,0=NO)
    LATERAL FORCE @ TOP OF POLE
    P=
    HEIGHT OF POLE ABOVE GRADE
    H=
    DIAMETER OF POLE FOOTING
    B=
    LATERAL SOIL BEARING CAPACITY
    S=
    ISOLATED POLE FACTOR (IBC 1804.3.1 or UBC note 3 on Tab 18-I-A)
    F=
    FIRST TRIAL DEPTH
    ===> D =

    0
    1.11
    19.68504
    0.5
    1.273
    1
    1

    no
    k
    ft
    ft
    ksf / ft

    ft

    Use 0.5 ft dia x 7.01 ft deep footing unrestrained @ ground level

    ANALYSIS
    LATERAL BEARING @ BOTTOM :
    LATERAL BEARING @ D/3 :

    REQUIRD DEPTH :

    S 3 FSD
    S 1 0.33S 3
    2.34 P
    A
    BS1

    A
    4.36H

    1 1

    A , FOR NONCONSTRAINED
    2

    LATERAL FORCE @ TOP OF POLE


    HEIGHT OF POLE ABOVE GRADE
    DIAMETER OF POLE FOOTING
    LATERAL SOIL BEARING CAPACITY
    1ST TRIAL

    4.25 PH
    BS 3

    , FOR CONSTRAINED

    P =>
    H =>
    B =>
    FS =>
    TRY D1 =>

    1.00

    ft

    1.00

    ft

    0.42

    ksf

    0.42

    ksf

    =>

    1.27

    ksf

    1.27

    ksf

    A =>
    RQRD D =>

    12.37
    23.61

    ft

    12.08

    ft

    12.30

    ft

    6.54

    ft

    5.17

    ksf

    2.75

    ksf

    =>

    15.66

    ksf

    8.32

    ksf

    A =>
    RQRD D =>

    1.01
    5.17

    ft

    4.72

    ft

    8.74

    ft

    5.63

    ft

    3.67

    ksf

    2.37

    ksf

    =>

    11.12

    ksf

    7.17

    ksf

    A =>
    RQRD D =>

    1.42
    6.26

    ft

    5.09

    ft

    7.50

    ft

    5.36

    ft

    3.15

    ksf

    2.25

    ksf

    =>

    9.55

    ksf

    6.82

    ksf

    A =>
    RQRD D =>

    1.65
    6.83

    ft

    5.22

    ft

    7.16

    ft

    5.29

    ft

    3.01

    ksf

    2.22

    ksf

    =>

    9.12

    ksf

    6.73

    ksf

    A =>
    RQRD D =>

    1.73
    7.01

    ft

    5.25

    ft

    LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 D

    S1

    =>

    LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 D


    CONSTANT 2.34P/(BS1)
    REQD FOOTING DEPTH

    S3

    2ND TRIAL :
    LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 D
    LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 D
    CONSTANT 2.34P/(BS1)
    REQD FOOTING DEPTH
    3RD TRIAL :
    LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 D
    LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 D
    CONSTANT 2.34P/(BS1)
    REQD FOOTING DEPTH
    4TH TRIAL :
    LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 D
    LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 D
    CONSTANT 2.34P/(BS1)
    REQD FOOTING DEPTH
    5TH TRIAL :
    LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 D
    LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 D
    CONSTANT 2.34P/(BS1)
    REQD FOOTING DEPTH

    NONCONSTRAINED
    CONSTRAINED
    1.11
    k
    1.11
    k
    19.7
    ft
    19.7
    ft
    0.50
    ft
    0.50
    ft
    1.27
    ksf / ft
    1.27
    ksf / ft

    TRY D2=>
    S1 =>
    S3

    TRY D3=>
    S1 =>
    S3

    TRY D4=>
    S1 =>
    S3

    TRY D5=>
    S1 =>
    S3

    You might also like