Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Hedlund2016 PDF
Hedlund2016 PDF
Article views: 29
DESCRIPTIVE REPORT
Department of Health Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden; bThe Country Hospital of Jnkping, Psychiatric Clinic, Jnkping, Sweden
ABSTRACT
ARTICLE HISTORY
Motor disturbances and disturbed self-recognition are common features that affect mobility in
persons with schizophrenia spectrum disorder and bipolar disorder. Physiotherapists in
Scandinavia assess and treat movement difficulties in persons with severe mental illness. The
Body Awareness Scale Movement Quality and Experience (BAS MQ-E) is a new and shortened
version of the commonly used Body Awareness Scale-Health (BAS-H). The purpose of this study
was to investigate the inter-rater reliability and the concurrent validity of BAS MQ-E in persons
with severe mental illness. The concurrent validity was examined by investigating the relationships between neurological soft signs, alexithymia, fatigue, anxiety, and mastery. Sixty-two
persons with severe mental illness participated in the study. The results showed a satisfactory
inter-rater reliability (n = 53) and a concurrent validity (n = 62) with neurological soft signs,
especially cognitive and perceptual based signs. There was also a concurrent validity linked to
physical fatigue and aspects of alexithymia. The scores of BAS MQ-E were in general higher for
persons with schizophrenia compared to persons with other diagnoses within the schizophrenia
spectrum disorders and bipolar disorder. The clinical implications are presented in the discussion.
Background
Patients with mental illness often suffer from a number
of bodily symptoms and dysfunctions due to this illness. They also have a high level of comorbidity with
metabolic syndrome, which is partly due to physical
inactivity (Gyllensten, Ekdahl, and Hansson, 2009;
Hedlund and Gyllensten, 2013; Probst, Knapen, Poot,
and Vancampfort, 2010). Their motivation to be physically active is generally impaired and it has been
found that autonomous motivation, which includes
the experience of physical activity as something enjoyable, is an important dimension for patients with severe
mental illness (Vancampfort et al, 2013; Vancampfort
et al, 2015). There are several reasons for patients with
severe mental illness to not experience physical activity
as enjoyable; these include positive and negative symptomatology and the occurrence of cognitive dysfunctions that may affect both the ability to perform and to
experience body movements (Morrens, Docx, and
Walther, 2014; Vancampfort et al, 2015). Motor function skills are not only based on a complex interplay
between afferent and efferent neurological activity but
also on more cognitive, psychological, and motivational
aspects (Destoop, Bruijn, Hulstijn, and Sabbe, 2009;
CONTACT Lena Hedlund, RPT, PhD
2016 Taylor & Francis
lena.hedlund@med.lu.se
KEYWORDS
Kronholm et al, 2011; Price, Dieckman, and HarmonJones, 2012; Schneider et al, 2014). Physiotherapists in
mental health services meet patients with a number of
different movement difficulties that negatively affect
their movement quality, which could lead to musculoskeletal pain (Hedlund and Gyllensten, 2010; Hedlund
and Gyllensten, 2013; Skjrven, Kristoffersen, and
Gard, 2010; Stubbs et al, 2014a). Movement quality is
a clinical phenomenon consisting of four dimensions
that interact in movement: 1) biomechanical; 2) physiological; 3) psycho-sociocultural; and 4) existential. It
has been defined as the way human movements are
executed with respect to the dimensions of time,
space, and intention. The integration of body awareness
and fluency, complexity, and accuracy of movements
makes movement quality a multi-dimensional phenomenon, used to describe movements in different areas of
physiotherapeutic practice like psychosomatic/psychiatric physiotherapy, physiotherapy with children with
cerebral palsy and physiotherapy in non-specific lowback pain (Boyce et al, 1991; Hodges et al, 2013;
Skjrven, Kristoffersen, and Gard, 2008). Good movement quality depends on adequate body awareness
(Skjrven, Kristoffersen and Gard, 2008), but when
working with movement quality in patients with severe
Department of Health Sciences Lund University, P.O. Box 157, 221 00 Lund, Sweden.
L. HEDLUND ET AL.
motor sequences, multi-sensory integration, and disinhibition signs are particularly apparent (Zhao et al,
2014). The latter suggests in a meta-analysis that cerebello-thalamo-prefrontal brainwork might be involved
in schizophrenia and related psychotic disorders. There
is also, however, the possibility that MD has only a
loose connection to the illness and is more associated
with a general lack of neurodevelopment (Morrens,
Docx, and Walther, 2014; Walther and Strik, 2012).
Disturbances in self-recognition
Another type of disturbance that affects the experience
of movement and movement quality is the disturbance
in self-recognition or self-awareness (e.g. experiencing
the body as being occupied by an alien force) (van
Veluw and Chance, 2014; Waters and Badcock, 2010).
These disturbances are mainly experienced and communicated by patients themselves, but experimental
studies have lately shown a deviation in the normal
mechanisms behind self-recognition in patients with
schizophrenia (Ferri et al, 2012; Thakkar, Nichols,
McIntosh, and Park, 2011; van Veluw and Chance,
2014; Waters and Badcock, 2010). Self-recognition is
proposed as being reliant on several mechanisms, basically on body ownership, the perception of body as
ones own and on agency, the perception of willed
action (like volitional body movement) as ones own.
These dimensions emanate from cognitions related to
afferent and efferent loops, bottom-up and top-down
dynamics (the two-way interaction of the nervous system), and the ability for multi-sensory integration and
intentional binding (Critchley, 2009; Postmes et al,
2014; Seth, 2013; Waters and Badcock, 2010). The
body scheme (the perception of body in its spatial
context) is also an important basic component of selfrecognition (Waters and Badcock, 2010). Multi-sensory
integration appears to be of great importance and
related to centering the perception of the body toward
the trunk. Furthermore, Serino et al. (2013) have also
described how a stronger experience of body ownership
increases resistance against experimental provocation
of body ownership. Postmes et al. (2014) described
schizophrenia as a self-disorder due to perceptual incoherence resulting in reduced recognition of the body,
declined authorship, impaired emotion processing, and
impaired source discrimination.
In summary, there are several aspects of disturbances in self-recognition and MD in patients with
severe mental illness that affect movement quality
and need to be addressed in physiotherapeutic treatment. The physiotherapist thus needs to assess movement quality, movement dysfunctions, and body
Methods
Study design
This clinical study has a cross-sectional design with a
prospective analysis of relationships employing one
novel and five well-used instruments. Health care professionals at eight outpatient mental health care units
asked 120 patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders or bipolar disorder to participate in the study.
Patients between 18 and 70 years of age diagnosed
with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (ICD-10: F20
F29) or bipolar disorder (ICD-10: F31) were included
in the study. Patients in need of treatment for addiction
and with pervasive brain damage were excluded. The
period of inclusion lasted for 11 months.
Participants
Ethical approval was obtained from Regional Ethical
Review Board, Lund University, Sweden, dnr 2012/
465. Seventy-one patients gave their written consent
to participate. Five patients did not come for the
appointment and four were not included due to logistical difficulties, resulting in 62 patients in the validity
study. Fifty-three of these were included in the interrater reliability study (Figure 1).
71 patients accepted to
participate and gave their
written consent
Data collection
Three physiotherapists (PTs) with 928 years of work
experience met and tested the patients, two of them
(LH, ALG) worked together in the reliability study
(block 1) and one PT (TW) was responsible for most
of the assessments in the validity study (block 2). The
patients started with either block 1 or block 2 and then
changed to the other. This meant that every other
participant first completed the assessments pertaining
to the validity study and then the assessment in the
reliability study in order to eliminate a systematic
impact of the order of the assessments. Within each
block, the assessments were executed in a standardized
order. In block 1, the physiotherapists changed roles as
test leader and observer for each new participant. All
test leaders had both previous clinical and research
experience of using the assessments in each block.
Assessments
Inter-rater reliability
BAS MQ-E is a development from the BAS and the
BAS-H by Roxendal (Gyllensten, 2001; Gyllensten,
Ekdahl, and Hansson, 1999; Gyllensten, Ekdahl, and
Hansson, 2009; Roxendal, 1985). The assessment consists of three parts: 1) a movement scale where the
physiotherapist moves together with the patient and
gives verbal instructions; 2) a questionnaire about
body experiences, symptoms, and coping strategies;
and 3) a qualitative interview focusing the experiences
of the body and movement in the present. The procedures and scale-steps are described in a manual
L. HEDLUND ET AL.
cognitive/perceptual factors to some degree assess overlapping constructs (Sanders et al, 2005).
Anxiety was assessed by the State Trait Anxiety
Inventory, STAI (Barnes, Harp, and Jung, 2002),
which consists of two 20-item self-assessments. The
STAI State assesses anxiety as experienced right now
and in general (Spielberger, 1983). STAI has shown
excellent internal consistency and the STAI Trait has
excellent testretest reliability (Spielberger, 1983).
Mastery was assessed by Pearlins mastery scale
(Bengtsson-Tops, 2004; Pearlin and Schooler, 1978).
Mastery concerns the extent to which one regards life
chances as being under control (Pearlin and Schooler,
1978). The instrument has shown satisfactory psychometric properties (Eklund, Erlandsson, and Hagell,
2012) and internal consistency in a Swedish sample of
people with schizophrenia (Bengtsson-Tops, 2004).
Alexithymia refers to difficulties in emotionalizing,
fantasizing, verbalizing, identifying, and analyzing emotions and is assessed by the Toronto Alexithymia Scale
(TAS-20) (Bagby, Parker, and Taylor, 1994). The
Swedish translation by Simonsson-Sarnecki et al.
(2000) has shown good internal consistency. TAS-20
includes four subscales: 1) Deficit in the Identification
of Cenesthesic Sensations (DICS); 2) CommunicativeExpressive Impairment (CEI); 3) Interpersonal
Distance Modulation (IDM); and 4) Adaptive
Acceptance (AA) (Maggini and Raballo, 2004a).
Fatigue was in the present study assessed by
Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory, MFI-20, a selfassessment scale with 20 items developed by Smets,
Garssen, Bonke, and Haes (1995) and translated into
Swedish by Frst and hsberg (2001). It reflects five
dimensions of fatigue: 1) mental fatigue; 2) physical fatigue; 3) general fatigue; 4) reduced motivation; and 5)
reduced activity. A reliability and validity study of MFI20 on patients with schizophrenia and schizophrenia
spectrum disorder showed a satisfactory psychometric
profile (Hedlund, Gyllensten, and Hansson, 2015).
Statistical analysis
A power calculation for the reliability study was performed based on the following hypotheses; anticipating
the inter-rater difference between true agreement and
random agreement to be 0.5, with a relative error of
30%, will result in a necessary sample size of 44 participants. Furthermore, anticipating the drop-out rate to
be 10% will require an initial sample size of 50 participants (Cantor, 1996).
The values of the first writers assessments of BAS
MQ-E were used in all statistical analyses except for the
inter-rater reliability analysis. The statistical analyses
Results
Background characteristics
The characteristics of the included sample are shown in
Table 1. Twenty-seven males and 35 females participated in the study. A majority, 32 people, were according to ICD 10 clinically diagnosed with schizophrenia
(F20.020.9). For each of the other diagnoses (F22, F25,
F29, and F31), there were less than 10 people.
Primary diagnosis
Schizophrenia F20
Persistent delusional disorders F22
Schizoaffective disorder F25
Unspecified non-organic psychosis F29
Bipolar disorder
Housing
Single
Married/co-habiting
With parents
Other; sheltered accommodation, homeless
Education
Secondary school
Upper secondary school
University
Missing
n (%)
27 (44)
35 (56)
32
9
8
6
7
(51.6)
(14.5)
(12.9)
(9.7)
(11.3)
33
19
6
4
(53.2)
(30.6)
(9.7)
(6.5)
9
29
23
1
(14.5)
(46.8)
(37.1)
(1.6)
Characteristic
Work situation
Regular work
Sheltered employment
Unemployed
Studying
Disability pension
Missing
Medication
Antipsychotic
Antidepressant
Sedative
Mood stabilizer
Sleeping medication
Years in contact with psychiatric care
Mean
SD years
Min-Max
Missing
Age
Mean
SD years
Minmax
n (%)
14
4
10
2
29
3
(22.6)
(6.5)
(16.1)
(3.2)
(46.8)
(4.8)
49
31
21
15
21
(79)
(50)
(33.9)
(24.5)
(33.9)
16.0
11.2
431
1
42.8
10.8
23
66
L. HEDLUND ET AL.
Weighted
Kappa
0.35
0.34
0.32
0.36
0.26
0.32
0.59
0.48
0.54
0.55
0.58
0.59
0.45
0.49
0.73
0.69
0.63
0.73
0.65
0.66
0.61
0.63
0.64
BAS MQ-E
NES
Repetitive
motor
0.35**
0.63**
(F 2231)
0.38*
(F 2231)
Coordination/breathing
BAS MQ-E
Relating/awareness
NES Cognitive/
perceptual
0.44**
0.40* (F 20)
0.50**
(F 2231)
0.40**
0.58** (F 20)
MFI-20 Physical
fatigue
0.34**
0.50**
(F 2231)
0.27*
0.52** (F 2231)
0.33*
0.47* (F 2231)
Table 4. Spearman correlations between BAS MQ-E questionnaire and MFI-20, TAS-20, Mastery, and STAI (n = 62).
Scale
Mastery
MFI-20
TAS-20
STAI
BAS MQ0.37** General F 0.45*
DICS 0.33* State 0.43**
E questionnaire
Physical F 0.64**
Trait 0.45**
Activity F 0.48**
Motivation F 0.37**
Mental F 0.48**
* Correlations are significant at the 0.05 level. ** Correlations are significant
at the 0.01 level.
Regression analysis
Regression analysis including the whole sample showed
that the NES cognitive/perceptual subscale accounted
for 18.5% of the variance of BAS MQ-E stability in the
function subscale, and MFI-20, physical fatigue
accounted for a further 9.7% of the variance of BAS
MQ-E stability in function (F = 11.99, p = 0.001). NES
cognitive/perceptual also accounted for 20.7% of the
variance of the BAS MQ-E coordination/breathing subscale (F = 15.69, p = 0.001). The MFI-20, physical
fatigue accounted for 52% of the variance and TAS20, DICS a further 5.3% of the variance (F = 31.97, p =
0.001) in the regression analysis of the BAS MQ-E
questionnaire.
Discussion
of body image, thus constituting an important foundation for the process of self-recognition. Experiences
connected to emotions and feelings, coordination of
bodily movements, breathing, and autonomous functions such as digestion and sexuality are located here
(Dropsy 1998; Gyllensten, 2001).
Concurrent validity, movement scale
There was a fair to moderate relation between the BAS
MQ-Es subscale stability in function and the NES
subscales repetitive motor and cognitive/perceptual.
There was also a fair to moderate relation between the
BAS MQ-Es subscale coordination/breathing and the
NES subscale cognitive/perceptual. Furthermore, the
regression analysis showed that the cognitive/perceptual subscale accounted for the variance of both stability in function and coordination/breathing. The NES
subscale cognitive/perceptual consists of important
neurological items, including working memory as well
as right-left orientation, audio visual integration and
extinction which are all a part of multi-sensory integration. High scores on the cognitive/perceptual subscale
have also shown to be associated with schizophrenia in
comparison with other forms of psychosis (Chan and
Chen, 2004).
Another moderate relation was between all the subscales of BAS MQ-E and the self-administrated MFI-20,
physical fatigue, which also accounted for 9.7% of the
variance of BAS subscale stability in function. This was
the only significant correlation found between the
movement scale and the different self-administrated
scales: TAS-20; STAI; Mastery; and the MFI-20. Both
mental and physical fatigue often affect the body posture more specifically and alertness in the overall body
movements more generally. One conclusion is thus that
certain aspects of neurological soft signs and experienced physical fatigue or lack of physical vitality influence the performance of voluntary movement in BAS
MQ-E among people with severe mental illness. The
profile of relations for the diagnostic subgroups was,
however, revealed as being somewhat different, thus
suggesting the existence of a slightly different profile
for movement difficulties between people diagnosed
with schizophrenia compared with those with other
diagnoses in the study.
Concurrent validity, questionnaire
The BAS MQ-E questionnaire was associated with
Mastery, the MFI-20 subscales, the TAS-20, DICS and
the STAI subscale state, and trait. Self-administered
scales are known to correlate with a certain degree
L. HEDLUND ET AL.
Clinical implications
Physiotherapeutic treatment in mental health services
are usually individualized and designed to increase the
patients resources and decrease bodily symptoms and
dysfunctions. The latter can have a number of causes and
lead to difficulties, both in relation to other people, the
self, and personal needs. Physically, they entail a greater
risk for various movement difficulties in daily life and
movement related injuries, fractures, tension, and pain
(Stubbs et al, 2014b; Stubbs et al, 2015). They may also
prohibit patients from being physically active and from
preventing increased risks for metabolic diseases by
making movement less pleasant, perhaps even painful,
and thus reducing autonomous motivation for physical
therapy (Vancampfort et al, 2015). It is of great importance that physiotherapists take a leading role in promoting physical activity for people with schizophrenia
(Stubbs et al 2014b, Vancampfort et al, 2015).
Treatments applied for increasing movement quality
may offer a first step in being able to tolerate movements
and/or make them enjoyable. When developing movement quality, it is important to assess the capacity to
perform voluntary movements.
MD such as extrapyramidal signs, catatonia, involuntary movements, motor slowing, and negative syndrome often spontaneously occur when clinically
assessing movement quality, and are noticed and communicated to other professionals. Neurological soft
signs are less evident with bodily movements, thus
making the concurrent validity interesting. When palpable difficulties occur with trunk coordination, it can be
relevant to further investigate and more specifically
assess the occurrence of neurological soft signs. This
assessment can, apart from explaining various movement difficulties, also contribute to clarifying the type
of psychosis and guide the team in the choice of treatment and rehabilitation (Docx et al, 2012; Keshavan
Limitations
There are a number of limitations in this study. Firstly,
we have no knowledge of the characteristics of those
who declined to participate in the study. Secondly, as
there were eight outpatient mental health service units
involved in data collection, there was no way to stringently follow up the recruitment process.
A major limitation is the lack of clear conceptual
boundaries between different types of MD and their
unknown etiology. Furthermore, we introduced
another aspect, movement quality, which is also a complex construct. The physiotherapist needs, however, to
include movement quality and movement control of
daily activities and social life in order to be able to
treat persons with movement difficulties (Hedlund
and Gyllensten, 2010; Hedlund and Gyllensten, 2013).
Another limitation is that the study included patients
with different diagnosis of severe mental illness.
Patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorder and
bipolar disease have both shown to have soft neurological signs, according to earlier studies (Docx et al,
2012; Zhao et al, 2013). The findings in this study
indicate a somewhat different BAS MQ-E profile in
the different populations, which should be targeted in
future research.
In terms of the inter-rater reliability, there were only
9 of 23 items that attained very good reliability. This
can be considered to be not satisfactory. However, the
scale has five levels in order to be clinically useful and
sensitive. We have investigated the disagreements of the
total number of ratings. There was no total agreement
for 33% (those cases had a discrepancy of 1 point),
while less than 1% had a discrepancy of 2 points.
There were only two cases with 3 points disagreement
and none with 4 points. This may thus be considered to
be clinically satisfactory.
Conclusion
BAS MQ-E showed satisfactory psychometrics when
assessing movement quality in people with severe mental
illness. The two parts, the movement scale and the questionnaire, complement each other and provide important
information about aspects of movement quality and body
experience. Furthermore, the movement scale appears to
be able to discriminate movement-related difficulties
between people with schizophrenia and other schizophrenia spectrum disorders and bipolar disorder. Different
parts of MD and disturbed self-recognition appear when
assessing movement quality. The concurrent validity with
neurological soft signs and experienced physical fatigue
was confirmed in terms of the BAS MQ-E movement
scale. There was also a concurrent validity regarding the
BAS MQ-E questionnaire and other self-administrated
assessments such as Mastery, Toronto Alexithymia
Scale, State and Trait anxiety Inventory and
Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory. Further studies of
validity are needed in order to confirm the results of the
present study before making general clinical assumptions
of dimensions related to movement quality.
Declaration of interest
The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone
are responsible for the content and writing of the article.
References
Bagby RM, Parker JD, Taylor GJ 1994 The twenty-item
Toronto Alexithymia Scale-I. Item selection and crossvalidation of the factor structure. Journal of
Psychosomatic Research 38: 2332.
Barnes LL, Harp D, Jung WS 2002 Reliability generalization
of scores on the Spielberger state-trait anxiety inventory.
Educational and Psychological Measurement 62: 603618.
Bengtsson-Tops A 2004 Mastery in patients with schizophrenia living in the community: Relationship to sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, needs for care and
support, and social network. Journal of Psychiatric and
Mental Health Nursing 11: 298304.
Bland JM, Altman DG 1997 Statistics notes: Cronbachs
alpha. British Medical Journal 314: 572.
Boyce WF, Gowland C, Rosenbaum PL, Lane M, Plews N,
Goldsmith C, Russell DJ, Wright V, Zdrobov S 1991
Measuring quality of movement in cerebral palsy: Review
of instruments. Physical Therapy 71: 813819.
Cantor AB 1996 Sample size calculations for Cohens kappa.
Psychological Methods 1: 150153.
Chan RC, Chen EY 2004 Executive dysfunctions and neurological manifestations in schizophrenia. Hong Kong
Journal of Psychiatry 14: 26.
Critchley H 2009 Psychophysiology of neural, cognitive and
affective integration: fMRI and autonomic indicants.
International Journal of Psychophysiology 73: 8894.
10
L. HEDLUND ET AL.
Serino A, Alsmith A, Costantini M, Mandrigin A, TajaduraJimenez A, Lopez C 2013 Bodily ownership and self-location: Components of bodily self-consciousness.
Consciousness and Cognition 22: 12391252.
Seth A 2013 Interoceptive inference, emotion, and the embodied self. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 17: 565573.
Simonsson-Sarnecki M, Lundh LG, Trestad B, Bagby RM,
Taylor G, Parker JA 2000 Swedish translation of the 20item Toronto Alexithymia Scale: Cross-validation of the factor structure. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 41: 2530.
Skjrven L, Kristoffersen K, Gard G 2008 An eye for movement quality: A phenomenological study of movement
quality reflecting a group of physiotherapists understanding of the phenomenon. Physiotherapy Theory and
Practice 24: 1327.
Skjrven L, Kristoffersen K, Gard G 2010 How can movement quality be promoted in clinical practice? A phenomenological study of physical therapist experts. Physical
Therapy 90: 14791492.
Smets E, Garssen B, Bonke B, Haes J 1995 The multidimensional Fatigue inventory (MFI-20) psychometric qualities
of an instrument to assess fatigue. Journal of
Psychosomatic Research 39: 315325.
Spielberger CD 1983 Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety
Inventory STAI (Form Y Self-Evaluation Questionnaire)
Stubbs B, Gaughran F, Mitchell AJ, Hert M, Farmer R,
Soundy A, Rosenbaum S, Vancampfort D 2015
Schizophrenia and the risk of fractures: A systematic
review and comparative meta-analysis. General Hospital
Psychiatry 37: 126133.
Stubbs B, Mitchell AJ, De Hert M, Correll CU, Soundy A,
Rosenbaum S, Vancampfort D 2014a The prevalence and
moderators of clinical pain in people with schizophrenia:
A systematic review and large scale meta-analysis.
Schizophrenia Research 160: 18.
Stubbs B, Sound A, Probst M, Parker A, Skjrven LH,
Gyllensten AL, Vancampfort D 2014b Addressing the disparity in physical health provision for people with schizophrenia: An important role for physiotherapists.
Physiotherapy 100: 185186.
Sundn A, Ekdahl C, Horstman V, Gyllensten AL 2014
Analyzing movements Development and evaluation of
the Body Awareness Scale Movement Quality (BAS MQ).
Physiotherapy Research International doi/10.1002/pri.1618
[Epub ahead of print].
Thakkar K, Nichols H, McIntosh L, Park S 2011 Disturbances
in body ownership in schizophrenia: Evidence from the
rubber hand illusion and case study of a spontaneous outof-body experience. PLoS ONE 6: e27089.
Vancampfort D, Hert M, Stubbs B, Vansteenkiste M, Herdt
A, Scheewe T, Soundy A, Stubbs B, Probst M 2013 The
importance of self-determined motivation towards physical activity in patients with schizophrenia. Psychiatry
Research 210: 812818.
Vancampfort D, Hert M, Stubbs B, Ward P, Rosenbaum S,
Soundy A, Probst M 2015 Negative symptoms are associated with lower autonomous motivation towards physical
activity in people with schizophrenia. Comprehensive
Psychiatry 56: 128132.
Van Veluw S, Chance S 2014 Differentiating between self and
others: An ALE meta-analysis of fMRI studies of self-
11