Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 8

Article ID: WMC004489

ISSN 2046-1690

Candida albicans: Colonization, role and effects of


this opportunistic pathogen on orthodontic
appliances
Peer review status:
No
Corresponding Author:
Dr. Francesca Muggiano,
Dentist, Dipartimento di Scienze Odontostomatologiche e Maxillo Facciali, Universita' degli Studi di Roma - Italy
Submitting Author:
Dr. Francesca Muggiano,
Dentist, Dipartimento di Scienze Odontostomatologiche e Maxillo Facciali, Universita' degli Studi di Roma - Italy

Other Authors:
Dr. Andrea Quaranta,
Dentist, Dipartimento di Scienze Odontostomatologiche e Maxillo Facciali, Universita degli Studi di Roma - Italy
Dr. Michele Previati,
Dentist, Azienda Sanitaria Regione Molise, Campobasso, Italy - Italy

Article ID: WMC004489


Article Type: Review articles
Submitted on:02-Jan-2014, 06:07:08 PM GMT

Published on: 03-Jan-2014, 04:57:49 AM GMT

Article URL: http://www.webmedcentral.com/article_view/4489


Subject Categories:ORTHODONTICS
Keywords:Candida albicans, orthodontics, orthodontic appliances, yeast, opportunistic pathogen, candidiasis,
oral flora, antifungal agents, IgA, fungi
How to cite the article:Muggiano F, Quaranta A, Previati M. Candida albicans: Colonization, role and effects of
this opportunistic pathogen on orthodontic appliances. WebmedCentral ORTHODONTICS
2014;5(1):WMC004489
Copyright: This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution
License(CC-BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the
original author and source are credited.
Source(s) of Funding:
No source of funding.
Competing Interests:
No competing interests.

WebmedCentral > Review articles

Page 1 of 8

WMC004489

Downloaded from http://www.webmedcentral.com on 03-Jan-2014, 04:57:49 AM

Candida albicans: Colonization, role and effects of


this opportunistic pathogen on orthodontic
appliances
Author(s): Muggiano F, Quaranta A, Previati M

Abstract
Candida albicans is a commensal yeast that is
normally present in the oral cavity of the population.
This opportunistic pathogen is frequently isolated from
the human mouth but its presence in the oral cavity is
not indicative of disease. Colonization of the oral
cavity by Candida albicans involves the acquisition
and maintenance of a stable yeast population.
Micro-organisms are continually being removed from
the oral cavity by host clearance mechanisms, and so,
in order to survive and inhabit this eco-system,
Candida albicans cells have to adhere and replicate.
Orthodontic and other oral appliances seem to favor
candidal presence.
The purpose of this paper is to review the literature,
with specific attention to colonization, intra-oral density
of the candidal organisms and Candida carriage status
in orthodontic patients during treatment.

Introduction
Candida albicans is a commensal yeast and its
presence in the oral cavity is not indicative of disease.
In fact, many individuals has Candida albicans as a
minor component of their oral flora, and they have no
clinical symptoms. Only a proportion of the population
is colonized by Candida albicans, and only a subset of
these individuals develops candidiasis.

Discussion
This yeast is normally present in small numbers in the
oral flora: it is an opportunistic pathogen present in
about 50-60% of the healthy human population, and
becomes pathogenic when the host immune defence
is undermined (for example in HIV infection).Therefore,
oral candidiasis results from yeast overgrowth and
penetration of the oral tissues when the host's physical
and immunological defenses have been undermined.
Tissue invasion may be assisted by secreted
hydrolytic enzymes, hyphal formation, and contact

WebmedCentral > Review articles

sensing. While these and other phenotypic


characteristics may endow certain Candida species or
strains with a competitive advantage in the oral cavity,
it is the host's immune competence that ultimately
determines whether clearance, colonization, or
candidiasis occurs.
Oral candidiasis presents clinically in many forms and
this reflects the ability of the yeast to colonize different
oral surfaces and the variety of factors which
predispose the host to Candida colonization and
subsequent infection. Oral presentations of candidiasis
vary from the large white plaques of
pseudomembraneous candidiasis on the tongue and
buccal mucosa to the palatal erythematous lesions of
chronic atrophic candidiasis, and to angular cheilitis on
the labial commissures (Samaranayake, 1990; Scully
et al., 1994; Shay et al., 1997).
Several studies have reported that predisposing
factors (such as mouth breathing and HIV-infection)
may increase the variability of Candida species in the
oral cavity: therefore, the health of an individual is a
predisposing factor for its colonization. The oral cavity
presents many niches for Candida albicans
colonization, and the yeast is able to adhere to a
plethora of ligands. A large number of sites in the oral
cavity can be colonized; in healthy individuals,
Candida albicans is most commonly isolated from the
midline of the middle and posterior thirds of the tongue,
the cheek, or the palatal mucosa (Arendorf and Walker,
1979, 1980; Borromeo et al., 1992).
Colonization of the oral cavity by this yeast can be
defined as the acquisition and maintenance of a stable
population of Candida albicans cells which does not
give rise to clinical disease. It depends on the rate of
yeast cells enter the oral cavity, their growth, and
removal of cells from the mouth by swallowing and
oral hygiene.
Micro-organisms are continually being removed from
the oral cavity by host clearance mechanisms, and so,
in order to survive and inhabit this eco-system,
Candida albicans cells have to adhere and replicate.
The following is an example scheme:

Rate of removal >rate of acquisition and growth


clearance.

Page 2 of 8

WMC004489

Downloaded from http://www.webmedcentral.com on 03-Jan-2014, 04:57:49 AM

Rate of removal = rate of acquisition and growth


colonization.
Rate of removal <rate of acquisition and growth (and
there is tissue damage)candidiasis.

In the table I are listed several factors that influence


candidiasis and colonization of the oral cavity by
Candida albicans.
1. Acquisition: in humans, Candida albicans
preferentially colonizes mucosal surfaces, and the
intestinal tract is believed to be a major reservoir for
infection (Odds, 1988; Cole et al., 1996). Candida
albicans can colonize practically any site in the
gastrointestinal tract, from the oral cavity to the rectum
and peri-anal tissues, allowing anal-oral inoculation to
occur (Soll et al., 1991). This yeast survives better on
moist surfaces than dry inanimate objects, but if the
degree of contamination is high enough, viable cells
will remain on dry surfaces for at least 24 hours.
Candida species can enter in the oral cavity by manual
inoculation, saliva transfer, or contaminated food and
drink.
2. Maintaning an oral Candida population: the entry of
Candida cells into the oral cavity is not sufficient for
colonization, but they must be stably maintained.
Since the oral cavity is a continuous-flow environment,
yeast cells will be washed out by saliva and swallowed
unless they adhere and replicate. Adhesion is
therefore of critical importance in colonization and it is
mediated between moieties of the Candida cell wall
and host surfaces.
3. Adherence to oral surfaces: Candida albicans can
adheres in a number of surfaces in the oral cavity
(buccal epithelial cells, inert polymers of dental
prostheses, teeth, and other oral micro-organisms).
Colonization may contribute to the deterioration of the
oral devices. This yeast showed a great adherence to
acrylic and adherence is increased on rough acrylic
and silicone rubber surfaces compared with smooth
surfaces (Verran and Maryan, 1997). The acrylic base
for dentures supported less adherence of C. albicans
than tissue conditioners and a soft liner (Okita et al.,
1991).
Many factors may influence the process of adherence
to oral epithelial cells (Tabel II).
The effects of these components on the adherence of
Candida albicans differ: some of them increase the
adhesion capacity, whereas others show inhibitory
activity. Biasoli et al. observed a correlation between
the capacity for yeast to adhere and its ability to
colonize mucosal surfaces. Candida presents the
highest values of adherence to oral epithelial cells
relative to other Candida species. Boshet al. verified

WebmedCentral > Review articles

that moderate stress may affect the process of


microbial colonization and the adherence of this
yeastto epithelial cells by altering the secretory activity
of salivary glands. Because adherence is an important
virulence factor in Candida, the inhibition of this
process is an important strategy in the prevention of
oral candidosis. Itsantigens, host proteins, antifungal
agents and antibodies have been used to inhibit
Candida albicansadherence to host cells. IgA seems
to play an important role by causing fungal
aggregation and preventing the adherence to mucosa
or oral surfaces.
4. Growth: In order to maintain Candida populations in
the oral cavity, cells must grow and multiply at a rate
at least equal to that of clearance. Anymetabolic
activity that helps this yeast acquire carbon or nitrogen
will aid its growth and survival in the oral cavity.
Competition with other oral micro-organisms
for nutrients, such as glucose, affects the growth rate
of Candida cells. It is recognized that antibiotic
treatment, which reduces the number of oral bacteria,
is a predisposing factor for oral candidiasis
(Samaranayake, 1990). Oral bacteria are present in
most oral sites at concentrations much higher than
Candida albicans, and so the Candida cells must
compete with them for adhesion sites and nutrients,
and be exposed to bacterial toxins and byproducts.
5. Evading host clearance mechanisms: immune
system defects are a major risk factor for candidiasis.
Innate defenses include the epithelial barrier and
anti-candidal compounds in saliva (such as lysozyme,
histatins, lactoferrin, and calprotectin). Acquired
immunity includes the production of immunoglobulins
and, if tissues are penetrated, the involvement
of macrophages and polymorphonuclear leukocytes.
The major immunoglobulin in saliva is secretory IgA.
As already said, the primary etiological agent of oral
candidiasis is the yeast Candida albicans; however,
other species that cause disease less commonly
include Candida tropicalis, Candida glabrata, Candida
krusei, Candida parapsilosis, Candida guilliermondii
and Candida dubliniensis.
Among the many factors that contribute to the higher
prevalence of Candida albicansin the oral cavity are its
excellent ability to adhere and the presence of many
cell receptors, which confer versatility and resistance
to removal by the fluids that bathe these surfaces.
Adhesion and colonization of the oral cavity by
Candida albicansis an initial step in candidosis. The
pathogenicity of Candidaspp. is due to enzyme
production, tissue invasion, and their capacity to
adhere to oral mucosa.

Page 3 of 8

WMC004489

Downloaded from http://www.webmedcentral.com on 03-Jan-2014, 04:57:49 AM

Orthodontic and other oral appliances seem to favor


candidal presence, so we will analyze the relationship
between this yeast and orthodontic patients. The
presence of orthodontic and other oral appliances
seems to alter the oral ecological environment. Hence,
these appliances may tip the balance to favour the
existence of Candida species.Biofilms on removable
orthodontic appliances act as reservoir of
microorganisms, capable of modifying the
environmental condition of oral cavity and are difficult
to be removed with routine hygiene measures.
Topaloglu-Ak et al. (2011) showed that mutans and
Lactobacillus sp. counts increased significantly 6
months after the insertion of fixed/removable
orthodontic appliances in the oral cavity. A significant
increase for Candida albicans presence was noted
after 3 months compared with baseline for fixed
appliances. Long-term utilization of orthodontic
appliances may have a negative effect on microbial
flora and increase the risk of new carious lesions and
periodontal problems.
Silva et al. (2013) compared the presence of
Candidaspecies in saliva and the levels of antiCandida albicansIgA in children with or without
orthodontic appliances. The results showed that
Candida albicansis the species most frequently
isolated from the oral cavities of patients in both
groups, followed by Candida tropicalis. No correlation
was observed between the level of
anti-Candidaalbicans IgA in saliva and the presence of
this yeastor its adherence to epithelial cells. In this
study, the quantity of IgA was low in children of both
the experimental group (who were users of removable
orthodontic appliances for at least 6 months) and the
control group (who were not users of any orthodontic
appliances). Salivary IgA generally increases with age
because the secretory immunological mechanism
develops simultaneously with the humoral immune
system. In patients with dental prosthesis or
removable orthodontic devices, salivary IgA reduces
the adherence of Candida albicansto polystyrene.
Their results indicate that anti- Candida albicansIgA is
not the most important factor to determine
Candidacarrier status.
Hence, Candida colonization is a consequence
of orthodontic treatment and can lead to oral
candidosis as a complication of removable appliance
treatment. The installation of metal devices leads to an
increase in the salivary concentration of metal ions
and in the growth of salivary Candida spp. Ronsani et
al. (2011) examined the relationship between released
metal ions (Ni++, Fe+++, Cr+++, Co++ or a mixture of
these metal ions) and Candida virulence, in order to

WebmedCentral > Review articles

evaluate whether metal ions affect fungal virulence.


The results revealed that all ions, except Co++,
caused increases in biofilm biomass. Their results
indicate that metal ions released during the
degradation of orthodontic appliances can modulate
virulence factors in C. albicans biofilms.
Therefore, during orthodontic treatment, it is important
to minimize colonization to prevent active infection that
could consequently interfere with treatment. Hygiene
is the most important factor in managing colonization.
In their study, Decelis et al. (2012) tested the efficacy
of NitrAdine to reduce Candida and they concluded
that it may reduce the Candida burden in maxillary
removable appliances. Carvalhinho et al. (2012)
analyzed the susceptibilities to antifungal agents
(fluconazole, econazole, miconazole and ketoconazole,
amphotericin B and nystatin), mouth rinses and
essential oils of patient's mouth with fixed
orthodontic appliances. The results showed that all
isolates tested were susceptible to amphotericin B,
nystatin and fluconazole; one isolate was resistant to
econazole (2.5%) and the other to ketoconazole
(2.5%). Econazole and ketoconazole had the highest
percentages of susceptible dose dependent (SDD), 55
and 95%, respectively. The study of mouth rinses
showed a high variability of efficacy against C.
albicans. The results showed that the isolates
susceptibility to essential oils differed. The profile
activity was: cinnamon > laurel > mint > eucalyptus
> rosemary > lemon > myrrh > tangerine. The
susceptibility of econazole-SDD isolates to cinnamon
and lemon was higher than those of the econazole-S
yeasts. In contrast, econazole-SDD isolates were less
affected by laurel than econazole-S counterparts.

Results and Conclusions


The limited amount of literature demonstrated that the
density of Candida increases; the most
common Candida species isolated in the orthodontic
patients is Candida albicans and that there seems to
be a direct relationship between the presence of a
removable appliance, Candida and low salivary pH
levels. It is important to emphasize that no healthy
patients developed Candida infection from the
orthodontic appliances. However, there seems to be a
trend that some non-Candida carriers converted
to Candida carriers following the insertion of the
appliances by unknown mechanism. This may indicate
a more cautious approach when providing orthodontic
treatments to immunocompromised children
concerning the possible increased risk of candidal

Page 4 of 8

WMC004489

Downloaded from http://www.webmedcentral.com on 03-Jan-2014, 04:57:49 AM

infection.
More opportunistic bacteria and fungi are detected in
orthodontic patients than in non-orthodontic patients.
Opportunistic bacteria adhere to saliva-coated metallic
brackets to the same degree as oral streptococci. The
isolation frequencies of opportunistic bacteria and
fungi increase during orthodonti treatment, suggesting
the importance of paying special attention to oral
hygiene in orthodontic patients to prevent periodontal
disease and the aggravation of systemic disease in
immunocompromised conditions.
Moreover, the use of dental devices significantly
increased the prevalence of yeasts in periodontal
pockets in patients presenting gingivitis.
In conclusion, orthodontic appliances may favor the
adherence of Candida to epithelial cells but do not
influence the presence of these yeasts in saliva, and
the levels of anti-Candida albicans IgA do not correlate
with yeast adherence or presence of this yeast in the
oral cavity.
Patients should be recalled within short time intervals
to be motivated for oral hygiene during their
orthodontic therapy.

References
1. Samaranayake LP. Essential microbiology for
dentistry, 2nd edn. Churchill Livingstone, Edimburg.ed.
2002.
2. Valletta, Matarasso, Vignogna; Malattie
odontostomatologiche ed. 2005.
3. Harrison. Principi di medicina interna. The
McGraw-Hill Companies ed. 2007.
4. Amerio PL, Bernengo MG, Calvieri S, Chimenti S,
Pippione M, Aric M, Aste N, Borroni G, Leigheb G,
Micali G, Nunzi E, Offidani AM, Tulli A. Dermatologia e
venereologia. Minerva Medica. Ed. 2009.
5. Roversi. Manuale di diagnostica e terapia. Merqurio
editore. ed. 2012.
6. Petti S, Barbato E, Simonetti D'Arca A. Effect of
orthodontic therapy with fixed and removable
appliances on oral microbiota: a six-month longitudinal
study. Microbiologica1997;20:55-62.
7. Sturtevant 1, Calderone R. Candida albicans
adhesins: biochemical aspects and virulence. Rev
Iberoam Micol. 1997;14:90-97.
8. Olsen I. Oral adhesion of yeasts. Acta Odontol
Scand. 1990 Feb;48(1):45-53.
9. Koga-Ito CY, Unterkircher CS, Watanabe H, Martins
CA, Vidotto V, Jorge AO. Caries risk tests and salivary
levels of immunoglobulins to Streptococcus mutans
and Candida albicans in monthbreathing patients.

WebmedCentral > Review articles

Caries Res. 2003 Jan-Feb;37(1):38-43.


10. Holmes AR, Bandara BM, Cannon RD. Saliva
promotes Candida albicans adherence to human
epithelial cells. J Dent Res. 2002 Jan;81(1):28-32.
11. Brito GN, Inocncio AC, Querido SM, Jorge AO,
Koga-Ito CY. In vitro antifungal susceptibility of
Candida spp. Oral isolates from HIV-positive patients
and control individuals. Braz Oral Res. 2011
Jan-Feb;25(1):28-33.
12. Gonalves e Silva CR, Melo KE, Leo MV, Ruis R,
Jorge AO. Relationship between Candida in vaginal
and oral mucosae andsalivary IgA. Rev Bras Ginecol
Obstet. 2008 Jun; 30(6): 300-5.
13. Silva CR, Oliveira LD, Leao MV, Jorge AO.
Candida spp. Adherence to oral epithelial cells and
levels of IgA in children with orthodontic appliances.
Braz Oral Res. 2013 Dec 2:0.
14. Cannon RD, Chaffin WL. Oral Colonization By
Candida Albicans. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med.
1999;10(3):359-383.
15. Pathak AK, Sharma DS. Biofilm associated
microorganisms on removable oral orthodontic
appliances in children in the mixed dentition. J Clin
Pediatr Dent. 2013 Spring;37(3):335-9.
16. Hibino K, Wong RW, Hagg U,Samaranayake LF.
The effects of Orthodonticappliances on Candidain the
human mouth. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2009
Sep;19(5):301-8.
17. Decelis S, Camilleri S, Zahra EV, Scerri E, De
Wever B. The effect of NitrAdine on the Candida levels
of maxillary removable appliances. Quintessence
Int.2012 Mar;43(3):239-45.
18. Carvalhinho S, Costa AM, Coelho AC, Martins E,
Samoaio A. Susceptibilities of Candida albicans mouth
isolates to antifungal agents, essentials oils and mouth
rinses. Mycopathologia. 2012 Jul;174(1):69-76.
19. Wellmer A, Bernhardt H. Adherence on buccal
epithelial cells and germ tube formation in the
continuous flow culture of clinical Candida albicans
isolates. Mycoses 1997;40:363-368.
20. Topaloglu-Ak A, Ertugrul F, Eden E, Ates M, Bulut
H. Effect of orthodontic appliances on oral
microbiota--6 month follow-up. J Clin Pediatr Dent.
2011 Summer;35(4):433-6.
21. Verran J, Maryan CJ. Retention of Candida
albicans on acrylic resin and silicone of different
surface topography. I Prosthet Dent. 1997;77:535-539.
22. Ronsani MM, Mores Rymovicz AU, Meira TM,
Trinidade Grgio AM, Guariza Filho O, Tanaka OM,
Ribeiro Rosa EA. Microb Pathog. Virulence
modulation of Candida albicans biofilms by metal ions
commonly released from orthodontic devices. 2011
Dec;51(6):421-5.
23. Cannon RD, Holmes AR, Mason AB, Monk BC.

Page 5 of 8

WMC004489

Downloaded from http://www.webmedcentral.com on 03-Jan-2014, 04:57:49 AM

Oral Candida: clearance, colonization, or candidiasis?


Dent Res.1995 May;74(5):1152-61.
24. Kitada K, de Toledo A, Oho T. Increase in
detectable opportunistic bacteria in the oral cavity of
orthodontic patients. Int J Dent Hyg. 2009
May;7(2):121-5.
25. Biasoli MS, Tosello ME, Magaro HM. Adherence of
Candida strains isolated from the human
gastrointestinal
tract.
Mycoses.
2002
Dec;45(11-12):465-9.
26. Biasoli MS, Tosello ME, Magaro HM. Adherence of
Candida strains isolated from the human
gastrointestinal
tract.
Mycoses.
2002
Dec;45(11-12):465-9.
27. Bosch JA, Turkenburg M, Nazmi K, Veerman EC,
de Geus EJ, Nieuw Amerongen AV. Stress as a
determinant of salivamediated adherence and
coadherence of oral and nonoral microorganisms.
Psychosom Med. 2003 Jul-Aug;65(4):604-12.
28. Jewtuchowicz VM, Brusca MI, Mujica MT, Gliosca
LA, Finquelievich JL, Lovannitti CA, Rosa AC.
Subgingival distribution of yeast and their antifungal
susceptibility in immunocompetent subjects with and
without dental devices. Acta Odontol
Latinoam.2007;20(1):17-22.
29. Davies TM, Shaw WC, Wothington HV, Addy M,
Dummer P, Kingdon A. The effect of orthodontic
treatment on plaque and gingivitis. Am J Orthod
Dentofacial Orthop 1991;99:155-61.

WebmedCentral > Review articles

Page 6 of 8

WMC004489

Downloaded from http://www.webmedcentral.com on 03-Jan-2014, 04:57:49 AM

Illustrations
Illustration 1
Table I: Factors that influence candidiasis and colonization of the oral cavity.
Candidiasis

Colonization

Tissue colonized

Acquisition (entry of cells into the oral cavity)

Virulence factors expressed by the Candida cells

Attachment and growth of cells

Host response

Penetration of tissues
Removal of cells from he oral cavity

WebmedCentral > Review articles

Page 7 of 8

WMC004489

Downloaded from http://www.webmedcentral.com on 03-Jan-2014, 04:57:49 AM

Illustration 2
Table II: Factors that influenced the adherence of Candida to oral epithelial cells
Yeast-related factors

Host-related factors

expression of adhesion proteins

sexual hormones

presence of germinative tubes

presence of fibrin and fibrinogen

production of extracellular polymers and enzymes

presence of salivary compounds (including mucine,


salivary proteins, and secretory IgA)

WebmedCentral > Review articles

Page 8 of 8

You might also like