Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bangladesh Loss and Damage Proposal
Bangladesh Loss and Damage Proposal
Mechanism on Loss
and Damage in
Bangladesh
Scoping Paper
Authors:
Saleemul Huq, Farah Kabir, S.M. Munjurul Hannan Khan, M.
Hafijul Islam Khan, Tanjir Hossain, Jesmin B Hossain, Laura
Pasternak, Naznin Nasir, Tahmina Hadi, Shaila Mahmud, Yousuf
Mahid
Contents
Page numbers
Abbreviations
6
1.
Introduction
8
2.
11
2.2.
Bangladesh
13
14
15
16
3.
Existing legal and institutional mechanisms relevant to loss
and damage
18
3.1.
23
3.4.2. Availability of data
25
4.
27
4.1.2. Financial resources administered by the Ministry of
Environment and 28 Forests
4.1.3. Financial resources administered by the Ministry of Disaster
Management and Relief
29
4.1.4. Case study: Care International
30
4.2.
32
5.
Stakeholder consultations
35
6.
5.1.
35
5.2.
38
6.2.
40
Risk reduction
6.3.
40
Risk retention
6.4.
Risk transfer
41
6.7
7.
7.2.
7.3.
and
8.
Concluding remarks
50
References
51Abbreviations
AOSIS
BCAS
BCCRF
BCCSAP
BCCTF
ECA
Bangladeshi Taka
BDT
CEGIS
CCA
CCTFA
CCU
CDMP
COP
Department of Environment
DoE
DMA
DRR
FFW
Forest Department
FD
Government of Bangladesh
GOB
GCF
Greenhouse Gas
GHG
GDP
INC
IPCC
ICCCAD
INGO
IUCN
LDC
LDRRF
MoDMR
MoEF
NAPA
NAIS
NELD
Non-Governmental Organisation
NGO
SIDS
SACEP
SODM
SBI
SABSTA
Terms of Reference
ToR
UNDP
UNFCCC
USD
VGD
VGF
WIM
1.
Introduction
2.
the insurance pool should come from mandatory contributions from developed
countries, and that the resources should be used to compensate small island
states along with low lying developing countries for loss and damage resulting
from the consequences of sea level rise (Ibid., 2). However, neither the idea of
an insurance pool or the suggested risk financing from the developed countries
were included in the UNFCCC.
It was not until 2007, when the Bali Action Plan called for action on disaster risk
reduction strategies and other means to address loss and damage in particularly
vulnerable countries, that the term loss and damage was coined and the issue
firmly entered the UNFCCC negotiation agenda (Conway, 2015). Earlier the same
year, the publication of Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), clearly pointed out that the historic greenhouse
gas emissions had already made a certain amount of loss and damage
unavoidable (IPCC, 2007, 736).
Under the Bali Action Plan, loss and damage was considered as a part of the
adaptation pillar, and was understood to comprise facilitative approaches,
including disaster risk reduction (DRR) strategies and risk transfer and
management tools such as insurance (Conway, 2015).
The momentum on loss and damage gathered in Bali continued through to
Cancun, culminating in a decision at the Conference of the Parties (COP) 16 in
2010, which established a work programme to consider approaches to address
loss and damage in developing countries particularly vulnerable to the impacts
of climate change (UNFCCC, 2011a).
It was only after two years in 2012, at COP 18 in Doha, where Parties decided to
outline a more definite scope for loss and damage, establishing three focus areas
for the UNFCCC:
1) Enhancing knowledge and understanding of comprehensive risk
management approaches;
2) Strengthening dialogue, coordination, coherence and synergies among
relevant stakeholders;
3) Enhancing action and support on loss and damage, including finance,
technology and capacity building (Conway, 2015).
The international arena therefore recognises that the conceptualisation and
identification of the nature of the loss and damage associated with climate
change impacts is a further challenge, and a prerequisite for ascertaining
appropriate approaches to address such loss and damage. Furthermore, to
satisfy these steps, institutional arrangements are required, which need to be
employed under appropriate legal and policy frameworks. The two-year Loss and
Damage Work Programme established under the UNFCCC in 2010 (COP 16
Decision, para. 26) explored the different tools and methodologies to assess loss
and damage and approaches and mechanisms to address it.
The outcomes of the activities of this Work Programme influenced the Parties of
the UNFCCC to establish the Warsaw International Mechanism (WIM) for Loss and
11
12
2.1.1.
The Paris Agreement achieved at COP 21 was a historical milestone for loss and
damage negotiations as Parties reached a consensus to incorporate loss and
damage as a separate and the third pillar of the climate regime, and also to
extend the WIM beyond 2016. However, the specific proposals to introduce a
financial mechanism to compensate for loss and damage did not survive the final
round of the negotiations.
The Paris Agreement incorporated loss and damage in a standalone article and
hence Article (Art.) 8 of the Paris Agreement provides a legal basis for long-term
action on loss and damage beyond adaptation. The Paris Agreement anchors the
WIM for loss and damage and also demonstrated commitment to understanding,
action and support including through the WIM, as appropriate on a
cooperative and facilitative basis with respect to loss and damage associated
with the adverse effects of climate change.
13
Parties to the Convention agreed to the continuation of the WIM, following the
review in 2016 at COP 22 (COP 21 Decision, para. 48). They also mandated to
the Excom of the WIM to establish a clearinghouse for risk transfer that serves as
a repository for information on insurance and risk transfer, in order to facilitate
the efforts of Parties to develop and implement comprehensive risk management
strategies. The WIM was also mandated to develop a task force to complement,
draw upon the work of and involve, as appropriate, existing bodies and expert
groups under the Convention. These include the Adaptation Committee and the
Least Developed Countries (LDC) Expert Group, as well as relevant organisations
and expert bodies outside of the Convention, to develop recommendations for
integrated approaches to avert, minimise and address displacement related to
the adverse impacts of climate change (Ibid., paras. 49-50). The Excom of the
WIM has been working from its third meeting onwards to operationalise the
aforementioned provisions. Moreover, the COP 21 decision clarifies that the
inclusion of loss and damage in the Paris Agreement does not provide any basis
for liability or compensation (Ibid., para. 52).
14
2.2. Bangladesh
Bangladesh, commonly known to the world as
one of the most climate-vulnerable countries,
often makes the international media headlines
for experiencing natural disasters causing loss
of life, damage to infrastructure and economic
assets and impacting lives and livelihoods. The
country is often exposed to environmental
hazards like floods, river erosion, cyclones and
droughts. Community risk and vulnerability
increases manifold as the country also
experiences adverse environmental impacts
such as deforestation, soil degradation,
erosion, and salinisation. This is exacerbated
by the prevalent social vulnerability caused by
extreme poverty and high population density,
indicated by the mere presence of social safety
nets (Akter, 2012). Regardless of the fact that
the country has achieved a lower middle
income country status, still nearly 32 percent
of its people live below the poverty line (MoEF,
2009), and climate change stands to impede
development.
Climate
change
will
likely
undermine
sustainable development, poverty eradication
and equity initiatives in Bangladesh. The
countrys agriculture and food production will
be severely impacted by rising temperature
(Wassmann et al., 2009). A recent study
estimated that climate change will cause a
reduction of long-term rice production by an
average of 7.4 percent each year for the period
of 2005-2050 which will lead to about United
States Dollars (USD) 26 billion in lost
agricultural gross domestic product (GDP) over
that period (Yu et al., 2010). It was also noted
that Bangladesh will lose in total about USD
121 billion or 5 percent of national GDP during
the period 2005-2050 due to climatic
variability (Ibid.).
As stated by the Bangladesh Climate Change
Strategy and Action Plan (BCCSAP), population
in many parts of the country will be so
adversely affected by climate change that they
will have to migrate permanently (MoEF
15
Figure A: Bangladesh
at a glance
Area: The total land area is
147,570 square kilometres.
Population:
Bangladesh
has a population of around
162.9 million (2016) (UNDP,
2016). It has an average
annual population growth
rate of around 2% (4.6% in
urban
areas),
and
a
population
density
of
976(people per sq. km)
(2011).
Location:
South-Asia.
Bangladesh is extremely
exposed to natural hazards
because of its location in the
wide Ganges delta plain, for
having a long coastline of
700 kilometres and for
sitting at less than 12
metres above sea level.
Per Capita Income : USD
1087.9;
Population Living below
Poverty Line: more than 63
million people (UNDP, 2016)
Common
Disasters
Natural
2009). The plan estimated the potential number of people who will be displaced
in the future to be more than 20 million and recognised that resettlement will be
tough considering the huge population of Bangladesh (MoEF 2009). The
destruction of habitat together with the limited number of livelihood
opportunities will be the root causes of this massive displacement.
2.2.1.
Since 1980, over two hundred natural disasters have hit the country resulting in
the death of almost 200,000 people and economic damages of approximately
USD 17 billion (MoDMR, 2013). Although the relation between climate change
and natural hazards is not linear or direct, rather the magnitude of climatic
changes seems to be small and negligible; they can raise the frequency and
intensity of climatic hazards (floods, droughts, cyclones etc.). Current trends
depict that floods and cyclones will become more severe and will also take place
outside of their established seasons. Figure B shows the multi-hazards map of
Bangladesh.
Climate induced natural hazards in Bangladesh are broadly categorised as rapid
onset or extreme events and slow onset processes. For example, sea level rise
and salinity intrusion are categorised as slow onset events while floods, drought,
cyclones, storm surges, heat stress and other extreme hazards are rapid onset
events. It is evident that both extreme and slow onset events are causing climate
change induced loss and damage.
Figure B. Multi-Hazard Map for Bangladesh
16
2.2.2.
Floods
Two thirds of Bangladesh are less than 5 metres above sea level which makes the
country extremely vulnerable to flooding. Each year, nearly one quarter of
Bangladesh is flooded (Ahmed and Mirza, 2000) and the country experiences one
severe flood every four or five years (MoEF, 2009). Since 1954, about 21 above
normal floods have hit the country (World Bank, 2010). The north-eastern part of
Bangladesh (particularly Sunamganj, Sylhet and Netrokona districts) is extremely
vulnerable to floods and flash floods. Roughly one million people annually are
affected by floods and riverbank erosion.
In 2007, a severe flood inundated 42 percent of the total land area, affecting 14
million people and killing 1110 people (BWDB, 2007). The loss of assets was
estimated to be as much as USD 1.1 billion (Ibid.). Nonetheless, the country has
successfully managed to decrease the intensity of impacts from above normal
floods since the 1970s. Better macroeconomic management, increased
resilience, improvement in disaster management and effective flood protection
17
infrastructure are some of the reasons identified behind this success (World
Bank, 2010). A flood in 1998 flooded twice the area compared to a flood which
happened in 1974. However, the estimated loss and damage of the flood in 1998
was 4.8 percent of the GDP compared with the flood of 1974 which caused a loss
and damage of 7.5 percent of the GDP (Islam and Mechler, 2007). A number of
hydrological models have shown that the frequency of monsoon floods in
Bangladesh could nearly double with an increase in global temperature of 2C.
Sea level rise will expose an additional 14 percent of the land to floods by 2030.
Cyclones
On average, Bangladesh experiences a severe tropical cyclone every three years
(MoEF, 2009). Between 1877 and 1995, Bangladesh was hit by 154 cyclones including 43 severe cyclonic storms and 68 tropical depressions. UNDP has
identified Bangladesh as the most vulnerable country in the world to tropical
cyclones. Bangladeshs vulnerability to cyclones has been exacerbated by the
shape of the coastline along with its high population density and number of
infrastructures which are poorly built and maintained (World Bank, 2000).
Although 60 percent of the cyclonerelated deaths which occurred worldwide
between 1980 and 2000 took place in Bangladesh (Nicholls et al., 2007), the
country is being considered as a role model because of its ability to significantly
reduce the loss of lives. For example, the devastating cyclone that hit the coastal
region of Bangladesh in 1970 caused the loss of over 300,000 lives and a total
property damage of about USD 2.6 billion (GED 2015). In comparison, Cyclone
Sidr of 2007, which was stronger compared to the 1970 cyclone, caused similarly
devastating economic loss and damage (USD 1.7 billion), but human casualty
was much less, where 3,406 lives were lost (Ibid.).The relatively recent Cyclone
Mahasen in 2013 and the most recent Cyclone Roanu in 2016, although not as
severe as their predecessors, affected over 1.2 million people in the coastal
areas of Bangladesh (GED 2015, Reliefweb 2016). Figure C below lists the loss
and damage due to a single severe cyclone by sector and indicates that the total
damage from an average severe cyclone is worth 2.4 percent of the GDP. The
sectors most affected by severe cyclones are housing and agriculture.
In Bangladesh, the frequency and intensity of cyclones and storm surges in the
Bay of Bengal is predicted to increase. The IPCCs Fourth Assessment Report
indicated that cyclone activity has already increased and predicted that it would
continue to increase in coastal areas (Nicholls et al., 2007). A study by
Unnikrishnan et al., (2006) forecasted an increase in both the frequency and
magnitude of tropical cyclones in the Bay of Bengal by 2050, resulting in heavy
precipitation in the region.
18
Housing
900
Agriculture
151
83
Education Infrastructure
73
Industry/Commerce/Tourism
56
27
Power
15
Other
28
1802
Share of GDP
2.4%
2.2.3.
Drought
In the last 50 years, 20 droughts occurred in Bangladesh (Ramamasy and Baas,
2007), a few of which have caused famine. In the past, severe droughts typically
affected about 47 percent of the landmass and 53 percent of the population
(Ibid.). During the first annual dry season (January to May), about 12,000 square
kilometres of cropland typically experiences drought, resulting in more than a 40
percent loss of premonsoon rice crops annually (Ramamasy and Baas, 2007).
Many estimates predict that the affected area by drought during the first annual
dry season could increase significantly under a severe climate change scenario.
On average, roughly 23,000 square kilometres of cropland are affected during
the second annual dry season (June to October) (Ibid.). Drought in northwestern
Bangladesh caused a 3.5 million tonnes reduction in rice production (Ibid.).
Climate change is likely to intensify drought as evapotranspiration is predicted to
increase considerably, especially during the postmonsoon and premonsoon
seasons (Mirza and Ahmad, 2005). Diminishing winter rainfall and overall
unpredictable rainfall patterns will increase moisture stress, especially in the
northwestern districts, and more frequent and intense droughts are likely to
occur (Huq et al., 1996). The yield of winter rice could reduce 55 to 62 percent
under a severe climate change scenario (Ibid.).
19
20
3.
industry and transport in Bangladesh, which are also very important to review
and identify their scope for addressing loss and damage resulting from climate
change related to these sectors.
The institution responsible for environmental management at national level is
primarily the Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF). The MoEF is
responsible for the formulation and monitoring of environmental policy and
legislation and is the controlling authority of all executing agencies like DoE,
Forest Department (FD), Bangladesh Forest Research Institute, Bangladesh
Forest Industries Development Corporation and Institute of Forestry and
Environmental Sciences. Furthermore, it coordinates other inter-ministerial (e.g.
water, industrial, transport, mining etc.) environmental issues.
The FD, under the MoEF, works as an executing agency for the protection,
control, conservation, expansion and maintenance of the national forest
resources. Its administrative and managerial units are divided according to
particular divisions, ranges and best level areas in the national forest. The
National Environmental Council is organised and chaired by the Prime Minister. It
functions through an Executive Ministerial Committee headed by the MoEF and a
Divisional Environment Committee headed by the Divisional Commissioner. The
MoEF is primarily responsible for environmental protection (SACEP, 2002). Thus,
legislative and institutional frameworks exist in Bangladesh to address loss and
damage caused by environmental injury, which provide the opportunity to also
address loss and damage associated with climate change. However, these need
to be amended to incorporate specific provisions on climate change impacts and
the associated vulnerabilities, including how to address loss and damage
resulting from climate vulnerabilities.
22
linkage between natural and climate change induced disaster (Ibid., s. 2).
Moreover, the Act has been adopted very recently and needs to be applied in
practice through the suggested institutional arrangements.
Bangladesh, being a signatory of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk
Reduction, will also have to provide DRR services to its citizens and make sure
that this responsibility is shared among the local government bodies as well as
the private sector and other concerned stakeholders. Bangladesh is also a
signatory of the Agenda 2030 for the Sustainable Development Goals and the
Paris Agreement.
Figure D below provides a brief overview of the existing institutional
arrangements in accordance with the legislations and policies related to disaster
management in Bangladesh (BAL, 2014).
24
26
3.4.1.
3.4.2.
Availability of data
3.4.3.
The most important aspects of technical capacity are the interpretation of data,
understanding the methodology and tools. To conduct training in analysis of data
and data generation are pivotal, in the context of climate change, socioeconomic and environmental area. A commonly referenced capacity is the
capability to extract the important aspects of information from the data provided
and disseminate and share it with the concerned stakeholders. Training and
public awareness-raising activities are often implemented to counter the lack of
technical capacity and skills, as well as providing guidance to appropriate
resources including information on best practice in implementing various
methods (Surminski et al., 2012). In Bangladesh, there is inadequate technology,
knowledge and skilled personnel to develop simulation of climate change
scenarios. Such an effort would help to identify potential risks, hazards and
vulnerabilities from the impacts of climate change. Simulation of climate change
scenarios can also help to devise appropriate and effective responses to counter
loss and damage. For example, it would help to implement effective adaptation
strategies including structural and non-structural measures.
31
4.
4.1.1.
The impact of loss and damage generates a need for funding provision either to
compensate for loss and damage or to protect assets and livelihoods of an
individual or a community. It is being estimated that from now on the most
vulnerable countries, with an increasing rate, will need USD 50 billion each year
to deal with loss and damage (Climate Network, 2016). Bangladesh has projected
a loss of 2 percent in GDP by 2050 (MoEF, 2015) and 9 percent of GDP by the
end of this century (ADB, 2014) due to the effects of climate change. In spite of
the absence of a financial mechanism (in the name of loss and damage) in place
with a specific mandate to deal with loss and damage in the national context,
Bangladesh plays a pioneering role with regards to developing national
strategies and policies to address DRR and CCA (e.g. BCCSAP, FYP, Bangladesh
Climate Change Trust Fund, Bangladesh Climate Change Resilience Fund etc.).
Given the obvious overlapping activities of CCA, DRR and loss and damage, in
the context of Bangladesh, it will be worthwhile to consider the current
adaptation and disaster risk finance in order to develop the national financial
mechanism on loss and damage.
In response to the need to address climate change impacts, the GoB spends a
significant amount of money on an annual basis. Recent data portrays that
domestic resources contribute to about 77 percent of the overall funding of
climate change related activities and the remaining 23 percent comes from
foreign donor resources. Most of the spending (around 97 percent) is related to
CCA measures (Faruque & Khan, 2013).
32
4.1.2.
Financial resources administered by the Ministry
of Environment and Forests
Two major funds; Bangladesh Climate Change Trust Fund (BCCTF) and
Bangladesh Climate Change Resilience Fund (BCCRF), have been developed to
implement the 44 programmes of Bangladesh Climate Change Strategy and
Adaptation Plan (BCCSAP). Both the funds are administered mainly by the MoEF.
Bangladesh Climate Change Trust Fund: BCCTF was established under the
Climate Change Trust Fund Act (CCTFA), adopted by the GoB in 2010, to fund
activities related to climate change (see s. 6 CCTFA for more information). It is
financed by the national revenue budget of Bangladesh as well as donor funds
and is used for implementing short, medium, and long-term goals and actions
relating to climate change. During the last seven fiscal years (up until 2016-17),
the GoB has allocated BDT 3100 crore (approximately USD 400 million) into the
trust fund. Recently for the fiscal year 2016-2017, the GoB has made an
allocation of BDT 100 crore for the trust fund. As per the CCTFA, a fixed deposit
of 66 percent of the total allocated amount and the interest accrued on the
remaining 34 percent (the so-called reserve fund) can be allocated to the trust
fund projects (BCCT, 2016). The CCTFA does not contain any explicit provision to
address or assess loss and damage associated with climate change impacts. The
Act poses a roundabout mandate to address loss and damage as the broad
mandate of the fund is to implement the BCCSAP (Faruque & Khan, 2013).
The fund is financed from the national budget of Bangladesh as well as donor
funds and is used for implementing short, medium, and long-term goals and
actions relating to climate change. The composition of the Funds Board of
Trustees can be criticised for the fact that it is overwhelmingly dominated by
Ministers and other government officials and has no representation from civil
society. A technical committee to assist the Board is also composed of
government officials and has no civil society representatives. The technical
committee has not been given any mandate to assess loss and damage or
establish baselines for assessing it in the future.
In March 2010, the GoB issued guidelines for how NGOs can access funding from
the BCCTF. According to these guidelines, only NGOs that are duly registered and
have experience in climate change, environment protection, and livelihood
issues, as well as having adequate capacity, can apply for funding. No individual
or community is eligible to apply for the project (Bangladesh Gazette, 2010).
Projects are examined and approved by the Board of the BCCTF.
Bangladesh Climate Change Resilience Fund: BCCRF has a similar mandate
to the BCCTF as it was established to facilitate the implementation of the six
pillars identified in the BCCSAP. It was originally called the Multi-Donor Trust
Fund, in 2009, and became operational in 2010. There is no direct provision for
BCCRF to provide compensation for actual loss and damage as it funds activities,
such as for climate change projects, primarily on adaptation but also on
mitigation, being implemented by both government agencies and NGOs. In total,
90 percent of the allocated funds will be utilised for government projects and the
33
4.1.3.
Financial resources administered by the Ministry
of Disaster Management and Relief
A key intervention, the Comprehensive Disaster Management Programme
(CDMP) that addresses the GoBs concerns of CCA and DRR to facilitate the
reform of the disaster management approach by expanding its focus to proactive
risk reduction, was coordinated by MoDMR. Under the CDMP, a fund called the
Local Disaster Risk Reduction Fund (LDRRF), accounting for 60 percent of the
overall CDMP budget, was created to provide resources and financial support to
the most vulnerable communities due to climate change stressors. In the 20132014 fiscal year, several Union Parishads received approximately USD 5.0 million
from the LDRRF for DRR works (MoDMR, 2013-2015). Although phase-II of CDMP
is over, the GoB is thinking to institutionalise the LDRRF component.
In addition to annual budget for DRR, MoDMR administers a couple of Social
Safety Net programmes such as; Food For Work (FFW), Test Relief, Bridge and
Culverts (FFW), Execution of Risk Reduction Programme, Relief and Rehabilitation
Programme, Vulnerable Group Feeding (VGF) and Vulnerable Group Development
(VGD) etc. (Department of Disaster Management, n.d.), to provide support to
disaster affected communities and individuals. In this fiscal year (2016-2017),
the GoB has allocated more than 2 percent of its overall GDP for social protection
schemes (The Daily Star, 2016).
Besides the contribution of the above mentioned two ministries, there are
several other funding mechanisms in order to cope with the impacts of natural
disaster; for example, a key contingency funding mechanism called the National
Relief Fund presently operates at national level and another window of
humanitarian assistance is the Prime Ministers Relief Fund (GoB, 2013).
Typically, the disaster management sector spends about 17.5 percent of all direct
expenditures in CCA (Ahmed et al., 2015). The GoB has regularly invested funds
34
to support its citizens during hazards and post-hazard by providing aid and relief
through budgetary allocation.
35
4.1.4.
CARE as an INGO has gained experience through its programming and has
some good practices to share in dealing loss and damage. Below is a case-
36
Results
Lessons learned
37
In fact, much of the international conversation on loss and damage has moved
towards finance mechanisms as described in Figure E below:
39
Comprehensive risk
management capacity with risk
pooling and transfer
Contingency finance
Climate bonds
Catastrophe bonds
Catastrophe bonds
Expost bonds
Financing approaches to making Total climate risk approach and most of the
development climate resilient
instruments mentioned above
Other innovative tools proposed (from Durand et al. 2016)
Although developing countries at the climate negotiations pushed for loss and
damage to include compensation and liability, Vanhala and Hestbaek (2016)
point out that many developing countries were never necessarily opposed to
these other tools, focused on insurance, risk-transfer and climate bonds. In fact,
Vanuatu, as early as 1991, put forward the idea of an international insurance
pool to compensate small island developing states (SIDS) for the damages
40
41
5.
Stakeholder consultations
The current mechanisms mostly focus on reducing death tolls; there is less
focus on assets.
The data collection forms (D from and SOS form) do not include
information such as social or cultural loss. Additionally, these also do not
include gender segregated data into different age groups.
Gaps
43
Overall Recommendations
44
Md.
Reaz
Ahmed, Director General, Dept. of
Disaster
Management was the Chief Guest
and
Dr.
Saleemul Huq, Director ICCCAD was
the Chair. Dr. S M Munjurul Hannan Khan, Joint Secretary, Ministry of Environment
and Forests moderated the workshop and a brief presentation was presented on
the Review Report by the Chair Dr. Saleemul Huq.
Jesmin B Hossain, Resilience & Climate Change Coordinator, CARE Bangladesh
presented a snapshots from the Regional level consultations, Arshad Muhammad,
ACD-Program CARE Bangladesh conveyed vote of thanks to the participants,
while Mehrul Islam, Director- PEARL also participated in discussion. Sajid Raihan,
Deputy Director- Programme, ActionAid Bangladesh spoke on next steps.
Detailed discussions were held on next moves to take the issues forward and
negotiation points of Bangladesh. DG DDM agreed to present the discussion at
COP 22.
Study Recommendations 2
Assess financial instruments and ensure that the funds reach the most
vulnerable;
Study Recommendations 3
Study Recommendations 4
Overall Recommendations
46
47
6.
significant burden placed on the public sector when unplanned and unforeseen
expenses emerge.
Two of the most common risk retention policies in Bangladesh are social safety
nets and micro insurance programmes.
uncertainty and volatility, but it does not directly prevent or reduce the risk of
damage or loss.
The market-based approach to offer financial relief after an event, commonly in
the form of insurance, is the most popular reactionary approach to risk
management. Unfortunately, market based for-profit insurances are unlikely to
be a feasible instrument to address poor peoples needs in developing countries,
even micro-insurance might not be able to adequately meet up with community
needs... insurance schemes are not a standalone solution and need to be
accompanied by other instruments of equal importance (BfdW, 2011).
Furthermore, though insurance schemes are a measure of protection in the event
of an unforeseeable disaster, they can create disincentives for farmers to
innovate and protect themselves through coping strategies which are better
suited to withstand the test of time and reoccurrence. This, in turn, exacerbates
farmers vulnerable positions. On the other hand, if a farmer was assured of
payments due to their insurance mechanism, that insurance might incentivise
the farmer to invest in saline or drought-resistant crops or to adopt modern
technologies for irrigation systems, because the assurance of their livelihood
would be the payout. The schemes currently supply short-term protection, but
fail to encourage long-term resilience.
Moreover, one of the fundamental rules of the insurance industry is that any risk
must be unforeseeable. In many cases, as the evidence of attribution and
climate science evolves, the long-term impacts of climate change are becoming
more and more apparent, rendering the insurance inappropriate from a business
point of view as premiums for farmers would be too high based on the assurance
that an event would take place.
One commonly supported transfer stipulation in the developing context is third
party payment. By transferring the risk, through farmer-based premium
payments, the system does not create accountability within the climate
emissions and contributions dilemma. Instead, it only transfers the risks and the
associated cost of loss and damage back to the farming individuals who
contributed the least, but are the most exposed and vulnerable to climatic shifts.
If we consider the additional complications of establishing a claims system, the
reality of implementation of a third party payment system becomes even more
challenging as the linear attribution or cause-and-effect of a single event
(especially extreme events) cannot (yet) be firmly established with a guarantee
of certainty.
Bangladesh is ranked as 76th in the world with a share of 0.02 percent of the
world insurance market. Though the insurance industries in the country have
been following a stable growth rate (of around 10 percent), the insurance
penetration was only 0.9 percent. The per capita spending on insurance is
reported as USD 2.6. Currently, a total of 77 insurance companies (46 non-life
related and 31 life related) operating in the country are regulated by the
Insurance Development and Regulatory Authority Bangladesh (IDRA, 2016). The
50
economic
and
livelihood
52
6.6
53
6.7
At COP 21, it was proposed that a task force be developed in order to develop
recommendations for integrated approaches to avert, minimize and address
displacement related to the adverse impacts of climate change, (COP 21
Decision, para. 50). At COP 22 in Morocco, a technical meeting will take place on
migration, displacement and human mobility (UNFCCC, 27-29 July, 2016). This
will be organised by the International Organization for Migration and will include
the ExCom of the WIM members, national and regional experts and
representatives of the UN and international organisations as well as from the
academic community (Ibid.).
International legal and policy instruments related to migration and displacement
have been deemed inadequate to protect so-called climate migrants. Refugee
law and other regional laws and policies on migration and displacement are
presently limited in scope either substantively or geographically to address the
issue and international debates are ongoing. A bottom-up approach to
addressing the issue (e.g. human rights based national policy on planned
relocation which takes into account both economic and non-economic loss and
damage) may facilitate the development of national and then regional and
international mechanisms for climate migrants, where migration in Bangladesh
is regarded as an opportunity and not a problem caused by climate change.
54
7.
and post) needs to consider future climate trajectories and adjust accordingly,
including loss and damage as a stream within. Greater financial and institutional
investment on DRR and regulations for market based mechanisms are proposed.
Risk retention and transfer approaches such as micro insurance through national
safety net programmes should be considered, although they should be tailored to
and fully accessible to poor and vulnerable communities in Bangladesh. A pilot
period for such schemes was desired at the divisional consultations; as
participants were vary of insurance. Microfinance programmes with flexible
repayment terms which allow clients to temporarily suspend payment during
drought, floods or in the onset of other events was also popular.
More adequate and accurate data needs to be made available to better identify
climate hazards, vulnerabilities and risks. A centralised system or enhanced
institutional arrangements would ensure the collection and management of upto-date, comprehensive and disaggregated (by gender, wealth and age) data
pertaining to loss and damage, including from slow onset events. This could
involve: risk identification; risk assessment, perhaps through index-based
insurance; the use of climate change related monitoring indicators in
consultation with the experts and local people as part of a well-designed climate
monitoring system; the identification of knowledge gaps in developing actions on
loss and damage; and a form of review of progress made with necessary
recommendations. Data collection should also include NELD including social or
cultural loss. On this note, it was proposed that a national mechanism, as with
the UNFCCC WIM on Loss and Damage, should address not only financial loss and
damage but also NELD.
In order to conduct such research as well as to address the other gaps described,
capacity building should be enhanced among the relevant government, subnational and research institutions, including on technical managerial skills. The
aforementioned centralised system could facilitate this and address the lack of
financial and human resources to address loss and damage. A knowledge hub at
local level was also a popular idea at the consultations, to enhance preparedness
at local level using local resources, as a centralised system may not be able to
address multiple disasters throughout Bangladesh simultaneously. Private sector
training could involve readiness and preparatory activities to facilitate access to
the GCF, help in the attainment of carbon credits (with international support) and
facilitate research.
induced loss and damage would also suggest the required approaches for
dealing with such loss and damage. Thus, the identification, measurement and
characterisation of loss and damage are primary requirements for developing
local, national, regional and international policy, legal and institutional
frameworks (Khan. HI, 2013).
Assessment and identification of the best approaches to address loss and
damage at a micro level demand a particular role of a particular state in
collaboration with regional and international efforts. So, the issue of loss and
damage must be incorporated into existing national institutional and financial
arrangements on climate change as mentioned in the COP 18 decision on loss
and damage which emphasises the need for strengthening institutional
arrangements and enhancing capacity building at the national levels to address
loss and damage (Decision 3/CP.18).
The previous Sections identified the scope of existing policies, legislations and
institutional arrangements relevant to loss and damage associated with adverse
impacts of climate in Bangladesh. They found that existing frameworks provide
limited scope to address loss and damage in Bangladesh. So, existing institutions
can be strengthened to address loss and damage, but the limitations identified in
the existing framework suggest that a specific institution/mechanism should be
established to provide oversight and guidance to all relevant sector institutions
to deal with loss and damage and to take specific initiatives to address loss and
damage at the national level.
The loss and damage vulnerable country initiative project, implemented by some
of the research organisations including ICCCAD, produced a knowledge base on
comprehensive risk assessment approaches including required tools and
methodologies, comprehensive risk management approaches including risk
transfer, risk retention and also approaches on addressing residual loss and
damage including irreversible and permanent loss at the national level (Loss and
Damage in Vulnerable Countries Initiative). Moreover, the WIM on Loss and
Damage is evolving along with structures and functions, generating knowledge
and information and providing guidance to take initiative at the national level.
So, the Government of Bangladesh can develop national mechanisms to address
loss and damage with clear linkages and synergies with the WIM which could also
provide bottom-up support to structuring the WIM to address loss and damage at
international level.
Therefore, at the outset, it is important to identify the functions and activities of
the proposed National Mechanism for loss and damage, which could provide
required guidance for developing the structures of the National Mechanism. The
functions and activities of the National Mechanism can be inter alia to develop:
57
The functions and activities of the proposed National Mechanism identified above
demand the design of an appropriate institutional structure. Initially, a National
Steering Committee of the National Mechanism for Loss and Damage can be
formed consisting of the highest policy makers and relevant experts and this
Steering Committee can provide oversight and guidance to a Technical
Working Group, consisting of relevant experts. The Technical Working Group
can develop a work-plan to identify the appropriate structures and functions of
the National Mechanism for Loss and Damage, which can be subject to approval
by the National Steering Committee. The National Mechanisms proposed
structure is demonstrated in Figure F below.
Figure F. Structural diagram of the proposed National Mechanism on
Loss and Damage
58
Functions
59
7.3.
The National Steering Committee of the National Mechanism for Loss and
Damage, which is suggested to be formed consisting of the highest policy
makers and relevant experts, would provide oversight and guidance to a
Technical Working Group. Therefore, the specific Terms of Reference (ToRs) of the
National Steering Committee should be as follows:
a) To take the political decisions related to UNFCCC negotiations on loss and
damage and national policy making processes;
b) To approve the formation and ToRs of the Technical Working Group;
c) To establish other expert groups as needed to assist the Technical Working
Group;
d) To approve the work plans of Technical Working Group;
e) To monitor and evaluate the work of the Technical Working Group.
The Technical Working Group can be formed with sectoral experts and can lead
the specific thematic activities identified in the previous Section. The specific
Terms of Reference (ToRs) of the Technical Working Group can be as follows:
a) To identify the thematic areas and activities;
b) To develop a thematic work plan and implement thematic activities;
c) To recommend the formation of expert groups/panels;
d) To approve the work plan, activities and ToRs of expert groups/panels;
e) To monitor and evaluate the implementation of work plans and activities of
expert groups/panels;
f) To provide technical guidance/recommendations to the National Steering
Committee.
8.
Concluding remarks
This technical report identified and reviewed the existing policies, legislations,
and institutions in Bangladesh relevant to loss and damage associated with the
adverse impacts of climate change and found that existing mechanisms relevant
to loss and damage are not adequate. In this light, this study explored the initial
structure and functions of the National Mechanism on Loss and Damage in
Bangladesh. However, to structure and design such a National Mechanism,
further comprehensive study is needed and the Government of Bangladesh can
commence such a study involving the relevant experts. A National Steering
60
References
ADB. (2014, August 19). Bangladesh Could See Climate Change Losses Reach
Over 9% Of GDP - Report, available at: <www.adb.org/news/bangladesh-couldsee-climate-change-losses-reach-over-9-gdp-report>. All links last accessed
17 October 2016.
Agrawala, S., and M. van Aalst. (2008). Adapting development cooperation to
adapt to climate change, Climate Policy 8: 183-193.
Ahmed, A. U. and M. Q. Mirza. (2000). Review of Causes and Dimensions of
Floods with Particular Reference to Flood '98: National Perspectives, In Q. C.
Ahmed, K. A.A, S. H. Imam, and M. Sarker (eds.), Perspectives on Flood 1998, 67
84, Dhaka: University Press Limited.
Ahmed, A.U., Huq, S., Nasreen, M. and Raghib, A.W. (2015). Sectoral inputs
towards the formulation of Seventh Five Year Plan (20162021). Climate change
and
disaster
management.
Final
report.,
available
at:
<www.plancomm.gov.bd/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/11a_Climate-Change-andDisaster-Management.pdf>.
Akter, S. (2012). The Role of Micro Insurance as a Safety Net Against
Environmental Risks in Bangladesh, The Journal of Environment and
Development, 21(2): 263380.
BAL. (2014). Bangladesh Awami League, Disaster Management Institutions,
Policies and Legal Framework, available at:
<www.albd.org/index.php/en/resources/special-reports/1387-disastermanagement-institution-policies-and-legal-framework>.
Bangladesh Environment Conservation Act 1995
Bangladesh Gazette. (2010). Ministry of Environment and Forest, (15th March,
2010).
BBS. (2015). POPULATION PROJECTION OF BANGLADESH Dynamics and Trends
2011-2061, available at:
<www.bbs.gov.bd/WebTestApplication/userfiles/Image/PopMonographs/Population
Projection.pdf>
BCAS and ICCCAD. 2015. Non-economic loss and damage caused by climatic
stressors in selected coastal districts of Bangladesh, (October, 2014), supported
by the Asian Development Bank, available at: <www.icccad.net/wpcontent/uploads/2016/02/ADB-Study-on-Non-Economic-Losses-and-DamagesReport_Final-Version-Reduced-File-Size.compressed1.pdf>.
61
Faruque, D. A., and Khan, M. I. (2013, June). Loss and Damage Associated with
Climate Change: The Legal and Institutional Context in Bangladesh, available at:
<loss-and-damage.net/download/7114.pdf>.
Finance Division. (2008). Bangladesh Economic Review. Dhaka: Finance Division,
Ministry of Finance.
GED. (2015, December). The 7th Five Year Plan (FY 2016-FY 2020), available at:
<www.plancomm.gov.bd/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/7FYP_afterNEC_11_11_2015.pdf>.
GoB (2014), National Social Protection Strategy (NSPS) of Bangladesh.
GoB. (2013, April). National progress report on the implementation of the Hyogo
Framework for Action (2011-2013), available at:
<modmr.portal.gov.bd/sites/default/files/files/modmr.portal.gov.bd/publications/c
2840e71_470b_419e_8e19_b2b8aaa63b04/bgd_NationalHFAprogress_201113.pdf>.
Government of Bangladesh, Standing Orders on Disaster Management (1973)
and (2010).
Hammil et al., (2008). Hammill, A., Matthew, R. and E. McCarter, Microfinance
and Climate change adaptation, IDS Bulletin. Vol. 39, No.4: 113 -122, available
at: <www.preventionweb.net/english/hyogo/gar/2015/en/bgdocs/inputs/Roberts,
%202014.%20Addressing%20Loss%20and%20Damage%20at%20the
%20National%20Level%20%20Lessons%20from%20Bangladesh.pdf>.
Hassan R. Islam M. S. Saifullah A. S. M. & Islam M. (2013). Effectiveness of Social
Safety Net Programs on Community Resilience to Hazard Vulnerable Population in
Bangladesh.
Hope, C. (2009). The costs and benefits of adaptation, In M. Parry, N. Arnell, P.
Berry, D. Dodman, S. Fankhauser, C. Hope, S. Kovats, R. Nicholls, D. Satterthwait,
R. Tiffin and T. Wheeler (Eds.), Assessing the Costs of Adaptation to Climate
Change: A Review of the UNFCCC and Other Recent Estimates, 100111, London:
International Institute for Environment and Development and Grantham Institute
for Climate Change.
Huq, S. (2012). OPINION: Loss and damage in Bangladesh from the front line of
climate change, available at: <cdkn.org/2012/12/opinion-loss-and-damage-inbangladesh-from-the-front-line-of-climate-change/?loclang=en_gb>.
IDRA. (2014). National Insurance Policy 2014, available at:
<www.idra.org.bd/new/uploads/National%20insurance%20policy.pdf>.
IDRA. (2016). IDRA Website homepage, available at:
<www.idra.org.bd/new/index-2.html>.
Oxfam GB. (2013). Meso-level index based flood insurance, available at:
63
<oxfamblogs.org/bangladesh/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/ProductBrochure1.pdf>.
INC. (1991). Vanuatu: Draft Annex Relating to Article 23 (Insurance) for Inclusion
in the Revised Single Text on Elements Relating To Mechanisms,
A/AC.237/WG.II/Misc.13.
IPCC. (2007). Climate Change 2007, Fourth Assessment Report - Report of the
International Working Group II Report Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability,
available at: <www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessmentreport/ar4/wg2/ar4_wg2_full_report.pdf>.
IPCC. (2014). Synthesis Report, Summary for Policymakers, available at:
<www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/syr/>.
Islam, K. M. N., and R. Mechler. 2007. ORCHID: Piloting Climate Risk Screening in
DFID Bangladesh: An Economic and Cost Benefit Analysis of Adaptation Options,
Sussex, UK: Institute of Development Studies.
Khan, HI. (2013). Policy and Legal Responses to Loss and Damage associated
with Climate Change, Ruppel, OC / C Roschmann / Ruppel-Schlichting, K. (Eds),
Climate Change: International Law and Global Governance: Legal Responses and
Global Responsibility. Volume II, Baden-Baden: NOMOS Law Publishers Germany.
Khan, HI. (2015). The Warsaw International Mechanism: Exploring the
Structures and Functions to Address Loss and Damage Associated with Climate
Change Impacts, Kheng-Lian Koh, Ilan Kelman, Robert Kibugi, & Rose-Liza Eisma
Osorio (Eds), Adaptation to Climate Change: ASEAN and Comparative
Experiences, World Scientific.
Khan, M., Z., H., Haque, M., and Rouf, M. (2013). An Assessment of Climate
Finance Governance Bangladesh, Transparency International Bangladesh,
available
at:
<www.tibangladesh.org/beta3/images/max_file/cfg_pub_Assesment_CFG_11-13.pdf>.
Khatun, F., Rahman, M., & Bhattacharya, D. Fisheries subsidies in an LDC:
experience of Bangladesh, Centre for Policy Dialogue, Bangladesh, available at:
< unep.ch/etu/fisheries%20meeting/submittedPapers/FahmidaKhatun.pdf>.
Kreft. S and Warner. K, (2012). Gauging solutions for climate loss and damage in
Africa, (June, 2012), available at: <germanwatch.org/en/download/6328.pdf>.
Loss and Damage in Vulnerable Countries Initiative. Available at: <loss-anddamage.net/national-actions>.
M. A. Awal. (2013). Social Safety Net, Disaster Risk Management and Climate
Change Adaptation: Examining Their Integration Potential in Bangladesh, CDMP
II, Building resilient future: Bangladesh reducing disaster risks in climate change.
64
Nishat, A., 2011. Protocol for Monitoring of Impacts of Climate Change and
Climate Variability in Bangladesh, IUCN, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Nishat, A., Mukherjee, N., Hasemann, A., and Roberts, E. (2013). A Range of
Approaches to Address Loss and Damage Impacts from Climate Change in
Bangladesh, International Centre for Climate Change and Development
(ICCCAD), Dhaka.
Paul, B.K. (2009). Why relatively fewer people died: The case of Bangladeshs
Cyclone Sidr, Natural Hazards 50, 289304.
Pervin M. (2013). Mainstreaming climate change resilience into development
planning in Bangladesh, Climate Change: Country Report, Centre for Research
on the Epidemiology of Disasters CRED, EM-DAT: The International Disaster
Database.
PPRC-UNDP. (2012). Power and Participation Research Centre and UNDP, Social
Safety Nets in Bangladesh Volume 2: Ground realities and policy challenges.
Rahman, R., Khan, M. F., Nishat, B., Mukherjee, N. and S. Ahmed. (2011),
Indicators to Assess Impacts on Hydro Meteorology, Dhaka: International Union
for Conservation of Nature.
Ramamasy, S. and S. Baas. (2007). Climate variability and change: adaptation to
drought in Bangladesh: A resource book and training guide, Dhaka: Asian
Development and Preparedness Centre and Food Agriculture Organization.
Reliefweb. (2016). Bangladesh: Cyclone Roanu - Humanitarian Coordination Task
Team (HCTT) Situation Report No. 1 (as of 1st June 2016), available at:
<reliefweb.int/report/bangladesh/bangladesh-cyclone-roanu-humanitariancoordination-task-team-hctt-situation-report>.
Roberts, E., and Huq, S. (2015). Coming full circle: the history of loss and
damage, Int. J. Global Warming, Vol. 8, No. 2.
Rowling, M. (2015). Obama unveils $30 mln for climate risk insurance to protect
poor. [online]. December 1. In Reuters.
SACEP. (2002). South Asian Cooperation for Environmental Programme,
Handbook on National Environmental Legislation and Institutions in Bangladesh,
(2002), Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Sarker, M. H., Huque, I., Alam, M., and R. Koudstaal (2003). Rivers, chars and
char dwellers of Bangladesh, International Journal of River Basin Management
1(1), 6180.
Shamsuddoha, Roberts, E., Hasemann, M., and Roddick, S. (2012). Establishing
links between disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation in the
context of loss and damage: policies and approaches in Bangladesh, (June
2013), available at: <loss-and-damage.net/download/7096.pdf>.
66
Siegele, L. (2012). Loss and Damage: The theme of slow onset impact, available
at: <germanwatch.org/en/download/6674.pdf>.
Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Hiedelberg. (1996). Bangladesh to Climate Change and
Sea Level Rise, T.E. Downing (Ed.), Climate Change and World Food Security,
NATO ASI Series, I 37, 347-379.
Start Network, Start Fund, available at: <www.startnetwork.org/start-fund>.
Surminski, S., Lopez, A., Birkmann, J., and Welle, T. (2012). Current knowledge
on relevant methodologies and data requirements as well as lessons learned and
gaps identified at different levels, in assessing the risk of loss and damage
associated with the adverse effects of climate change, available at:
<unfccc.int/files/adaptation/cancun_adaptation_framework/loss_and_damage/ap
plication/pdf/background_paper_full.pdf>.
The Daily Star. (2016). Social Protection Strategy and Budget 2016, available at:
<www.thedailystar.net/round-tables/social-protection-strategy-and-budget-20161215241>.
UNDP. (2016). About Bangladesh.
http://www.bd.undp.org/content/bangladesh/en/home/countryinfo.html
UNFCCC (2011). Report of Conference of the Parties, on its Sixteenth Session,
Cancun
(29
November10
December
2010),
Addendum,
FCCC/CP/2009/11/Add.1.
UNFCCC. (November, 2012). Subsidiary Body for Implementation,
FCCC/SBI/2012/INF.14. (15 November 2012).
UNFCCC. (2012.) A literature review on the topics in the context of thematic area
2 of the work programme on loss and damage: a range of approaches to address
loss and damage associated with the adverse effects of climate change,
FCCC/SBI/2012/INF.14, available at:
<unfccc.int/resource/docs/2012/sbi/eng/inf14.pdf>.
UNFCCC. (2016). Summary of proceedings of the first meeting of the Expert
Group on non-economic losses , available at:
<unfccc.int/files/adaptation/groups_committees/loss_and_damage_executive_co
mmittee/application/pdf/summary_of_proceedings_nels_eg_2016_09_16_2000.pd
f>.
UNFCCC. n.d., Focus: Adaptation, available at:
<unfccc.int/focus/adaptation/items/6999.php>.
UNFCCC. n.d., Initial two-year workplan of the Executive Committee of the
Warsaw International Mechanism for Loss and Damage, available at:
<unfccc.int/adaptation/workstreams/loss_and_damage/items/8805.php>.
UNFCCC. n.d., Membership of the Executive Committee of the Warsaw
International Mechanism for Loss and Damage, available at:
67
<unfccc.int/adaptation/cancun_adaptation_framework/loss_and_damage/items/8
806.php>.
UNFCCC. n.d., Draft Terms of References, available at:
<unfccc.int/files/adaptation/groups_committees/loss_and_damage_executive_co
mmittee/application/pdf/draft_tors_aa2d_21_sept.pdf>.
UNFCCC. (27-29 July, 2016). Technical meeting on migration, displacement and
human mobility, available at:
<unfccc.int/adaptation/cancun_adaptation_framework/loss_and_damage/items/9
682.php>.
Unnikrishnan, K., Saito, A. and Fukao, S. (2006). Differences in magnetic storm
and quiet ionospheric deterministic chaotic behavior: GPS total electron content
analyses, Journal of Geophysical Research 111: doi: 10.1029/2005JA011311.
issn: 0148-0227.
Vanhala, L and Hestbaek, C. (2016, forthcoming). Framing Loss and Damage in
the UNFCCC Negotiations: The Struggle over Meaning and the Warsaw
International Mechanism, Global Environmental Politics.
Wassmann, R., Jagadish, S.V.K., Sumfleth, K., Pathak, H., Howell, G., Ismail, A.,
Serraj, R., Redona, E., Singh, R. K., and Heuer, S. (2009). Regional vulnerability
of climate change impacts on Asian rice production and scope for adaptation, In:
Sparks, D.L. ed. Advances in Agronomy. Burlington, MA: Academic Press. 102, 91133.
World Bank. (2000). Bangladesh Climate Change and Sustainable Development,
Washington DC: The World Bank Group.
World Bank. (2010). Economics of Adaptation to Climate Change Synthesis
Report, Washington DC: The World Bank Group.
World Bank. (2011). Natural Disasters: What is the Role for Social Safety Nets?
No. 1102, available at:
<siteresources.worldbank.org/SOCIALPROTECTION/Resources/SP-Discussionpapers/Safety-Nets-DP/1102.pdf>.
Yu.W.M , Alam. M, Hassan. A, Khan.A.S, Ruane.A.C, Rosenzweig. C, Major. D and
Thurlow.J. (2010). Climate Change Risks and Food Security in Bangladesh
[online], London, Washington, World Bank, available at:
<documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/419531467998254867/pdf/690860ESW0
P1050Climate0Change0Risks.pdf>.
68