Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Practice Guideline
Practice Guideline
Key Points:
Discussion:
Epilepsy management in persons with intellectual disabilities has special significance for
a number of reasons. The prevalence of epilepsy in the mentally retarded is much
greater than in the general population. It ranges from approximately 20% to 50% with
cerebral palsy and greater degrees of retardation conferring higher risk. In addition,
many of these individuals have co-morbidities (such as dysphagia and associated risks
for dehydration and respiratory infections) that can hamper efforts to gain and/or
maintain seizure control.
Consistent with the high frequency of co-morbidities is the finding that adults with
intellectual disabilities commonly take a number of routine medications, many of which
may interfere with or potentiate the actions and/or side effects of AEDs. These
medications may be prescribed by multiple providers making avoidance of
complications even more challenging.
Finally, these individuals often suffer from a variety of functional impairments, which
interfere with their activities of daily living. Therefore, a focus on preventing additional
functional decline and avoiding treatments which may adversely affect activities of daily
living should be maintained.
Approach:
Getting the history: The history will typically be obtained from a direct care staff person
and/or the Case Manager. If a Case Manager is involved, they can assist with obtaining
records such as past EEG reports, seizure history, medication usage history, medical
problem list, hospitalization history, etc. Direct care staff are responsible for recording
recent events. If they are not using seizure tracking tools, providing and instructing
them in their use will assist with your management. If seizures are reported, ask staff to
provide details regarding the characteristics (time/circumstances of onset, movements
and other symptoms observed during and after, length, post-ictal condition, etc.). Also
inquire as to any history of missed drug doses, intercurrent illness, changes in other
medications, or other events that may effect seizure threshold or drug level.
Exams: For evaluation of therapeutic efficacy, an examination is often not necessary.
Furthermore, for CSN Members, reimbursement is not conditioned on the Member
being present. If an examination is required and difficulties are anticipated, e.g.,
behavioral issues are present, request that familiar staff accompany the Member and
assist in obtaining compliance.
Monitoring treatment efficacy: In addition to obtaining a reliable history on seizure
frequency and severity (see above) queries should be made as to any side effects or
References:
Hanzel TE, Bauernfeind JD, Kalachnik JE, Harder SR. 2000. Results of barbiturate
antiepileptic drug discontinuation on anti-psychotic medication dose in individuals with
intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research. Vol. 44 Part 2 pp 155-
163.
Coulter DL. 1997. Comprehensive Management of Epilepsy in Persons with Mental
Retardation. Epilepsia. 38(Suppl. 4): S24-S31.
Pellock JM, Morton LD. 2000. Treatment of Epilepsy in the Multiply Handicapped.
Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews. 6: 309-323.
Browne TR, Holmes GL. 2001. Epilepsy. N Engl J Med. Vol. 344, No. 15.
Alvarez, Norberto. 2001. Epilepsy in Adults with Mental Retardation. EMedicine
Journal, Volume 2, Number 1.
Patsalos, P.N., Perucca, E. 2003
Clinically Important Drug Interactions in Epilepsy; Interactions Between Antiepileptic
Drugs and Other Drugs. The Lancet Neurology 2 (2): 473-481