Professional Documents
Culture Documents
AVO MockTest
AVO MockTest
On AVO intercept versus AVO gradient plots what are the controls on the background trend for
sandstone reservoirs and how does this trend vary with over-pressure?
AVO Intercept Normal incidence RC & AVO Slope Gradient of AVO
For controlling the background trend for sandstone reservoir Zero-offset RC or Intercept is
controlled by the contrast in AI, and The gradient or Slope is more complex in term of rock
properties; contrast in Vp, density and Vs.
The background trend varies with over-pressure due to over-pressure and gas sand have a same
response in term of AI. Need to know that AVO background trends as a function of Vp/Vs.
- Vp/Vs ratio in overpressure zone High
- Vp/Vs ratio in gas sands is Low
(PAPER Source) : In shallow, unconsolidated sediments where VP /VS _ 2.0, the background trend
will be less correlated. This can also be true in overpressured sediments where the background VP
/VS can exceed 2.0 at great depths. Intercept or normal-incidence reflectivity can be a better
hydrocarbon indicator in shallow, unconsolidated sands than an AVO anomaly
2. Draw a sketch to show how porosity variations map into the background trend.
3. Explain the location of shales on such a crossplot and how their relationship changes at shallow, mid
and deep prospects.
- The schematic of effects of compaction on
clean sands and shales
- At shallow depth : shale has higher AI than
sands (Harder). Modestly negative AVO
gradient)
- At mid depth : there is crossover between
shale and snad due to compaction and
cementation.
- At deep prospect : shale has lower AI than
sands (softer). (Negative AVO gradient)
- Normally, in shallow section the AI of shale
is higher than sandstone and it viceversa
for the deep section
Running of the inversion algorithm with generation ofacoustic or elastic impedance cubes and
extraction of attributes.
Visualisation and interpretation of the results in terms of reservoir development.
10. What are the advantages of undertaking a pre-stack inversion rather than a post-stack inversion?
Working pre-stack or with partial angle (Near, Mid, Far) stacks introduces more than one
seismic measurement and therefore provides an additional degree of freedom for reservoir
property prediction. We can expect to access more than one petrophysical parameter in a
meaningful manner (Connolly, 1999)
Traditional pre-stack inversion provides either compressional and shear impedance (IP and IS)
or the triplet Vp, Vs, and density.
Shear wave may yield valueable information on the lithological distribution (Pedrel et al.1998).
The S wave mainly interact with the rock frame work, whereas the P wave are influenced by
the porefill and rock matrix.
Signal to noise of the near and far stacks is high compared with that of a gather and partial
stacks remove much of the residual move-out problem from gradient estimation. Furthermore,
Pre-stack migration becoming routine-can re-locate the near and far stacks correctly
11. What sort of parameter testing would you undertake for a post-stack inversion?
Wavelet
Well Ties
Background Model
Impedance Prediction at Wells
Low Frequency Merge
Scale and Resolution
12. What is Elastic Impedance and Extended Elastic impedance, EEI?
Elastic impedance inversion (EI) is a generalization of acoustic impedance for variable incidence
angles. It provides a consistent and absolute framework to calibrate and invert nonzero-offset
seismic data
Elastic impedance inversion is performed in three parts:
1. Well data analysis of elastic rock properties and generation of EI logs
2. Wavelet extraction, using the EI logs and the input angle stacks
3. AVO and AVA inversion of seismic cubes, using the classic two-term Shuey approximation or a
full implementation of the Aki-Richards AVO equations
The EEI method is based on Shuey's form of the Aki-Richards equation. This method is used to invert
data with AVO effects. It uses angle stacks for a range of incidence angles (essentially a partial farangle stack) for the inversion. This approach to inversion also lets you use a wavelet especially for
the offset (so the inversion becomes more accurate than using one wavelet for all angles in
stacked data). Extended elastic impedance (EEI) can be used to estimate k, l, m, AI, VP/VS and other
petrophysical reservoir parameters by creating a reflectivity section for the specific parameter
13. What procedures would you use, given EEI logs at a borehole, to find the optimum fluid and lithology
indicator angle stack?
By correlating EEI logs calculated from particular angle with fluid (Sw) and lithology (GR). Crosscorrelation between GR&EEI and trying particular angle, we can find the certain angle with good
correlation.
14. What are the advantages of stochastic inversion over deterministic inversion?
15. Describe conditional simulation procedures to map in reservoir heterogeneity to a post-stack
inversion
16. Briefly describe what are the modern developments in pre-stack inversion involving facies
descriptions. Use a flow diagram if at all possible