A STUDY ON EMPLOYEES PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL IN RANE BREAK LINING

LIMITED, PONDICHERRY- 605 107.

PROJECT REPORT - 2014

Submitted to

ANNAMALAI UNIVERSITY
A PROJECT REPORT SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE
REQUIREMENTS FOR THE AWARD OF DEGREE OF MASTER OF
BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
Submitted By
D.DHEIVAKANNI
(Reg. No. 131126)
Under the guidance of

A.KANIMOZHI
Assistant Professor,
Department of Business Administration.

ANNAMALAI

UNIVERSITY

DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

ANNAMALAI NAGAR - 608 002
TAMIL NADU, INDIA
2014

ANNAMALAI

UNIVERSITY

DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

FACULTY OF ARTS
PROJECT REPORT - 2014
A STUDY ON EMPLOYEES PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL IN RANE BREAK LINING
LIMITED, PONDICHERRY- 605 107.
Bonafide Record of work done by

D.DHEIVAKANNI
(Reg. No. 131126)
Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the award of the degree of
MASTER OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION in the Department of Business Administration

A.KANIMOZHI

Dr.C.MADHAVI

Faculty Guide

Professor & Head Department,

Asst Professor,

Dept. of Business Administration.

Dept. of Business Administration.

Submitted for the Viva-Voce Examination held on ______________

INTERNAL EXAMINER

EXTERNAL EXAMINER

DECLARATION

I hereby declare that the matters embodies in this MBA project entitled A STUDY ON
EMPLOYEES PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL IN RANE BREAK LINING LIMITED,
PONDICHERRY- 605 107 is the result of the study undertaken by me under the guidance of
A.KANIMOZHI, Assistant Professor, Department of Business Administration, Annamalai
University, Annamalai Nagar, Chidambaram. I further declare that this project report does not
from part of any other project reports or dissertations on the basis of which a degree was
awarded or conferred on an earlier occasion on me or any other candidate.

Place: Annamalai Nagar

Date:

D.DHEIVAKANNI

(Reg. No. 131126)

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
First of all I am very grateful primarily to the guide God Almighty and to My parents
for their blessings
I own my sincere thanks to Dr.C.MADHAVI Professor & Head. Department of Business
Administration Annamalai University for the generous help rendered during the course of the
study.
It gives me immense pleasure to express my sincere gratitude and he artful thanks to my
faculty guide A.KANIMOZHI, Assistant Professor, Department of Business Administration
Annamalai University for her valuable guidance.
I also express my sincere thanks to my company guide Mr K.Rajeshkumar, Rane
Brake Lining Limited Puducherry - 605 107, his valuable suggestion and ideas to complete
my thesis work. Last but not least I would like to thank all Non-Teaching staffs in the
Department of Business Administration and beloved my friends and relatives for their kind help
in finishing the project successfully.

D.DHEIVAKANNI

CONTENTS

Chapter No

Title

Page
No

INTRODUCTION

1 16
17 -24

COMPANY PROFILE
II

REVIEW OF LITERATURE

III

25 - 29

30 33
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

IV

DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION

34 - 79

FINDINGS

80

VI

RECOMMENDATION

81

82
VII

VIII

CONCLUSIONS

BIBLIOGRAPHY

83

84 - 87
IX

APPENDIX

LIST OF TABLES
Table

Page

Title

No

No

AGE OF THE RESPONDENTS

34

EDUCATION LEVEL OF THE EMPLOYEES

36

MONTHLY INCOME OF THE RESPONDENTS

38

YEARS OF EXPERIENCE

40

RESPONDENTS

OPINION

ABOUT

PRESENT

42
PERFORMANCE LEVEL
RESPONDENTS
OPINION

ABOUT

PERFORMANCE

44
APPRAISAL SYSTEM FOLLOWED PERIODICALLY
RESPONDENTS OPINION ABOUT PERFORMANCE

46
APPRAISAL DECIDING PROMOTION
RESPONDENTS OPINION ABOUT SENIORITY

48
CONSIDERED FOR PROMOTION
RESPONDENTS OPINION ABOUT RESULT OF

9
10

50
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM
RESPONDENTS OPINION ABOUT SELF IMPROVEMENT

52

RESPONDENTS OPINION ABOUT PERFORMANCE

11

54
APPARAISAL GIVES JOB SATISFACTION
RESPONDENTS OPINION ABOUT DISCIPLINE AND

12
13

56
ATTENDANCE
RESPONDENTS OPINION ABOUT JOB KNOWLEDGE

58

RESPONDENTS OPINION ABOUT PERFORMANCE

14

60
APPRAISAL SYSTEM INCREASES SELF DEVELOPMENT

15

RESPONDENTS OPINION ABOUT IMPROVES

62

RESPONDENTS OPINION ABOUT LAST PERFORMANCE

16

64
APPRAISAL

17

RESPONDENTS OPINION ABOUT OVERALL

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM

66

RESPONDENTS OPINION ABOUT RELATIONSHIP WITH

18

68
APPRAISER

RESPONDENTS OPINION ABOUT PERFORMACNE

19

70
APPRAISAL GIVES ADDITIONAL RESPONSILITIS

20
21

RESPONDENTS OPINION ABOUT PERSONAL AND HIDDEN

STRENGTH
RESPONDENTS OPINION MANAGERS SERIOUSNESS

72
74

CHI-SQUARE TEST I: TO FIND ASSOCIATION BETWEEN

22

76
AGE AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE LEVEL
CHI-SQUARE TEST II: TO FIND ASSOCIATION BETWEEN

23

EXPERIENCE AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE LEVEL

77

SENIORITY CONSIDERED FOR PROMOTION

24

ONE WAY ANOVA

EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATION VS PERFORMANCE

78

APPRAISAL IS CARRIED OUT IN YOUR ORGANIZATION.

ONE WAY ANOVA

25

EXPERIENCE VS PERFORMANCE APPRAISALS PLAY A

MAJOR

ROLE

IN

RESPONSIBILITIES,

DELEGATION,
EMPLOYEE

79

ADDITIONAL

GROWTH

AND

DEVELOPMENT.

LIST OF CHARTS
Table
No

Title

Page
No

AGE OF THE RESPONDENTS

35

EDUCATION LEVEL OF THE EMPLOYEES

37

MONTHLY INCOME OF THE RESPONDENTS

39

YEARS OF EXPERIENCE

41

RESPONDENTS

OPINION

ABOUT

PRESENT

43
PERFORMANCE LEVEL
RESPONDENTS
OPINION

ABOUT

PERFORMANCE

45
APPRAISAL SYSTEM FOLLOWED PERIODICALLY
RESPONDENTS OPINION ABOUT PERFORMANCE

47
APPRAISAL DECIDING PROMOTION
RESPONDENTS OPINION ABOUT SENIORITY

49
CONSIDERED FOR PROMOTION
RESPONDENTS OPINION ABOUT RESULT OF

9
10

51
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM
RESPONDENTS OPINION ABOUT SELF IMPROVEMENT

53

RESPONDENTS OPINION ABOUT PERFORMANCE

11

55
APPARAISAL GIVES JOB SATISFACTION
RESPONDENTS OPINION ABOUT DISCIPLINE AND

12
13

57
ATTENDANCE
RESPONDENTS OPINION ABOUT JOB KNOWLEDGE

59

RESPONDENTS OPINION ABOUT PERFORMANCE

14

61
APPRAISAL SYSTEM INCREASES SELF DEVELOPMENT

15

RESPONDENTS OPINION ABOUT IMPROVES

63

RESPONDENTS OPINION ABOUT LAST PERFORMANCE

16

65
APPRAISAL

17

RESPONDENTS OPINION ABOUT OVERALL

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM

67

RESPONDENTS OPINION ABOUT RELATIONSHIP WITH

18

69
APPRAISER
RESPONDENTS OPINION ABOUT PERFORMACNE

19

71
APPRAISAL GIVES ADDITIONAL RESPONSILITIS

20
21

RESPONDENTS OPINION ABOUT PERSONAL AND HIDDEN

STRENGTH
RESPONDENTS OPINION MANAGERS SERIOUSNESS

73
75