Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Teaching of English Tenses and Aspects - by Tai Lam
The Teaching of English Tenses and Aspects - by Tai Lam
AN EFFECTIVE ORIENTATION
FOR THE TEACHING OF ENGLISH TENSES AND ASPECTS
Tai Lam
California State University, USA
2009
INTRODUCTION
With the development of communicative approaches in the late 1970s, the role of
downplayed, and it was even suggested that teaching grammar was not only unhelpful but might
actually be negative. However, recent research has demonstrated the need for formal teaching for
learners to attain high levels of accuracy. This has led to a resurrection of grammar teaching, and
its role in ESL/EFL learning has become the focus of much current investigation. Grammar is
known to be a tool in language learning and should, however, be communicatively taught. Of all
aspects of English grammar, it is very necessary to teach ESL/EFL students how to understand
the tenses and aspects of verbs and use them accurately, meaningfully and appropriately in
communication. To some Asian languages such as Chinese and Vietnamese, which have no such
clear notions as Indo-European languages do, teaching this grammar aspect will be difficult and
challenging. Based on the pavement of prior studies, this article attempts to explore the major
difficulties in teaching English tense-aspect system due to the new concepts to tonal-language
EFL learners and makes some suggestions of the more effective orientation of teaching target
tenses.
RATIONALE
Most teachers of English in Vietnam and China during the last decade usually spent a lot
of time teaching EFL learners English grammar which they had to try to indicate the differences
between the source and the target languages in order to persuade them to accept the rules. The
teaching of English tenses has always been a great problem with learners because their mother
tongues are tenseless languages that belong to Indo-Chinese linguistic system and cultural
background.
English tenses have been most covered in the traditional tests in schools. They have also
always been the most bewildering to (Asian) school students. Various types of testing
traditionally designed so far are such as: Having students supply the correct tenses of the given
verbs; identify the tense usage errors; changing the sentences from one specific tense to another;
identify the differences between the minimal tense-pairs (simple present versus present
progressive) etc. For practice, students are usually asked to do a lot of drills in conjugating the
verbs in a certain of tenses required, or the preparation to know how to use English tenses
properly. In teaching, the teachers apply a lot of techniques to explain the structures as well as
the usages of the tenses, which do not appear or exist in their mother languages.
Generally speaking, most of the TESOL teachers seem to impose, or precisely to say, to
force students to accept the rules and the concepts reluctantly. Briefly speaking, they usually
explain the uses of tenses by presenting that English tense-aspect system has two elements of
meaning: The “time”, indicating when the event takes places, present, past or future? And the
other is the “aspect”, showing how the event is viewed, perfective or imperfective? About the
concept, the teachers quite often focus that the tenses of the verb are the relation between the
forms of the verb and the time of the action which it describes. That is, tenses have much a linear
sense of time and they are basically distinguished in accordance with chronological level.
PROBLEM STATEMENT
Asian languages are not Indo-European. In the language, verbs have no tense-aspect
system. The similar notions are indicated by an auxiliary particle meaning that the action
expressed is in progress, perfection or futurity. The expressions of time concept in the English
language reflect that the students do not have much of a linear sense of time. Sometimes, even
the teachers themselves are at the loss for an answer of some questions asked by the students
about the tenses, or feel confused and perplexed when explaining preterite, or present perfect
aspect … such of those are often bewildering topics to students. They are puzzling that the idea
of something “ actually taking place” or “ going on” can be expressed with a verb in the present
tense, even the past tense, as well as the progressive aspect in relation to time. For example, Past
event is described in the present tense, as so-called “historical present”; Future intentive action is
expressed in progressive aspect. The following two sentences seem equally valid : “ I met him a
couple of times this morning.” & “ I have met him…this morning”. In general, those problems
are due to the different cultural, concerptural and linguistic backgrounds between the source and
target languages. The present tense in most languages refers to actions that are taking place in the
present. But in English, this is not really true. The present tense is used to refer to actions that are
habitual, repeated, or always true. (e.g., The earth rotates the sun; My father does morning
exercise every morning). In English the present progressive is used to express actions that are
taking place in the present (e.g., He’s working at the factory; He’s preparing to take CAHSEE
examination). Such problematic concepts have caused difficulties in teaching ESL/EFL students.
EFFECTIVE ORIENTATION
An effective orientation for the teaching of English tenses first introduced in Vietnam in
the late 1990s has somehow helped teachers of TEFL (teaching English as a foreign language)
broarden the scope of current practice in teaching strategy training. According to this orientation,
psychologically, time is essentially non-linear. The traditional English grammar on tenses may
be reconsidered on a psychological level. Because present, past and future sometimes impinge on
another. The sense of tense-aspect system is “sense of relativism”. Asian (Chinese) concept of
time is thought to be several durations in different levels for incomplete beings moving toward
performance. So tenses can be operating mainly on the level of mood instead of time if learners
understand the sense of time on psychological-spiritual level. “Time” here in the language could
The grammarians’ effort in order to explain away the function of tenses by the source of
help (recourse) to time only leads to many unnecessary & confusing rules. “Time and tense must
not be confused”, “ tenses are not concerned primarily with time ”, but “with the way in which
we look upon an activity or state ” ( Hornby 1980,P.126). The possible suggestions to intensify
the power of practice in the teaching ESL is to take more consideration of the learners’ cultural
background.
Asian students should benefit from taking English tenses as “Expressions of Moods”
Curricula drawn on such simpler description promise to bring better results with Asian
ESL/EFL students. Practice makes perfect only when the practice is oriented in a proper and
practical way, otherwise it may be a wasting that students would spend more time to forget the
From the new orientaion for the teaching of English tenses, the TESOL teachers can
benefit from it by applying some of viewpoints below in teaching Asian students. Tenses are
concerned on the perfectiveness of the action rather than showing different locations of an event
about the future. Aspect is more important than time when discussing the future. It is an
extrenely important dimension in helping learners manage the English tense-aspect system. If
learners are able to develop a “feel” for the degree of perfectiveness conveyed by the aspects,
they will have a tremendous advantages in learning to cope with the boundary problems
mentioned above. Hirtle (1967), in his article explains that simple aspect refers to events that are
conceptualized as complete wholes. The events are not presented as allowing for further
development. That could be interpreted that the action in the simple aspect does not involve in
the degree of perfectiveness. It does or did happen as a real whole event. For instance, “Max lives
in New York”, “Peter drives to work every day”, or “John met his manager yesterday” etc, the
actions “live” , “drive” or “meet” do exist and happen without mentioning the time (The defautt
time is present) or did happen at the exact time in the past without involving their perfectiveness
of happening.
perfectiveness, where “the event or state is viewed as some portion of a whole and where there is
room for further development or change” and “ allowing for the possibility of change”
(Hirtle,1967). For instance, “Max is living in New York now”is some portion of a whole and
There are several different ways to express future time in English. The choice of which
form depends on how the speaker sees the event and “not”on its certainty or nearness to the
present. Therefore, to this orientational approach, future can be subcategorized into : immediate
future (spontaneous intention), future intention (planned intention), future arrangement and
certain futurue . Let’s take Chinese and Vietnamese languages as example for the consideration
Sentences in the simple past and present perfect aspect sense are expressed by adding a
partical before predicative : le (la), guò…le, yǐjing for Chinese (了,啦,過,已經) or “ (đã) rồi,
For examples:
CN: Ta zúotian (yǐjing ) bìng le. ( 她昨天病了. )
VN: Cô ấy hôm qua (đã) bệnh rồi. (She fell ill yesterday. )
CN: Wǒ péngyou (yǐjing ) qù (guò) Zhongguó le. ( 我朋友已經去過中國了. )
VN: Bạn tôi đã đi (qua) Trung Quốc (rồi).
(My friend has been/was to China already.)
Sentences with the sense of futurity are expressed by using some particals preceding
For examples:
CN: Ta míngnián dăshuàng qù Meigúo. (他明年打算去美國 )
VN: Năm tới anh ấy định đi Mỹ. (I expect to go to US next year. )
CN:Ta (xiăng)yào măi yì jian fángzi. (他想要買一間房子 )
VN: Anh ấy muốn mua nhà. ( He’s planning to buy a house.)
CONCLUSION
Most of Asian languages are tenseless and rely on pragmatic and lexical devices to
indicate temporal locations as shown in above examples. Classroom instruction may force an
early start of tense use; the Chinese and Vietnamese way of expressing temporality may
“reinforce the learners' initial tendencies of relying on pragmatic and lexical devices to indicate
temporal locations”; and the early start of tense use results in an extended period during which
the learners' expression of temporality exhibits a very slow shift from depending more on
pragmatic and lexical devices to depending more on grammatical devices. It is widely known
that teaching method is based on an approach and constitues a design for an instructional system.
It indicates what the objectives are; which language content is selected and how it organized;
which types of learning tasks and teaching activities are used. It also signify the roles of the
learners, teachers and instructional materials used. However, adopting some kind of electticism
rather than on specific method is a more effective approach for the intened purpose.
REFERENCES
Allwright, D. & Bailey, K. M. (1996). Focus on the language classroom: An introduction to
classroom research for language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bygate, M., Tonkyn, A. and Williams, E. (1994) Grammar and the Language Teacher, Prentice
Hall.
Candlin, C. N. & Mercer, N. (2001). English Language Teaching in its social context. NewYork:
Routledge.
Celce-Murcia, M., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (1999). “The Grammar Book.“ Heinle & Heinle
Publishers.
Davis, G. B. (1993). Tools for teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
Davies, P., & Eric,. (2000). Success in English teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R. (1987). Understanding second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R. and Hedge, T. (1993). Second language acquisition research: how does it help teachers.
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Harmer, J. (1998). The practice of English language teaching. New York: Longman.
Hedge, T. (2000). Teaching and learning in the language classroom. Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
Nunan, D. (1998). Language teaching methodology: A textbook for teacher. London: Prentice
Hall.
Nunan, D. (1999). Second language teaching & learning. Massachusetts: Heinle & Heinle
Publishers.
Richards, J.C. and Rodgers, T.S. (1992) Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching (eighth
edition)Cambridge University Press. Richards, J.C. and
Rodgers, T.S. (1992) Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching (eighth edition)
Cambridge University Press.
Rutherford, W. E. (1987) Second Language Grammar: Teaching and learning. Harlow: Pearson
Education.
Scriverer, J. (2005) Learning Teaching: A guide book for English language teachers (Second
edition), Oxford: Macmillan.
Stern, H. H. (1983) Fundamental concepts of language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
Telemans, G. and M. Yawin-Illiassou (1990) TEFL: T Methodology Handbook. Niger National
University, School of Education.
Universities of Vietnam (1999 – present) College Entrance Tests
Ur, P. (1996) A Course in Language Teaching, Cambridge University Press.
Yang, S., Huang, Y.Yuan, (2004) “The Impact of the Absence of Grammatical Tense in L1 on the
Acquisition of the Tense-Aspect”, Walter de Gruyter.
Legend
• action that takes place once, never or several times
• actions that happen one after another
moment in time • actions that suddenly take place
Affirmative/Negative/
Tenses Uses Signal Words
Question
• action in the present taking
place once, never or several
always, every …,
times
never, normally, often,
A: He speaks. • facts
seldom, sometimes,
Simple Present N: He does not speak. • actions taking place one after
usually
Q: Does he speak? another
if sentences type I (If I
• action set by a timetable or
talk, …)
schedule
in a year, next …,
• action in the future that tomorrow
cannot be influenced If-Satz Typ I (If you
A: He will speak.
• spontaneous decision ask her, she will help
Future I Simple N: He will not speak.
• assumption with regard to the you.)
Q: Will he speak?
future assumption: I think,
probably, we
might …, perhaps
A: He is going to speak. • decision made for the future
Future I Simple
N: He is not going to • conclusion with regard to the in one year, next
speak. future week, tomorrow
(going to)
Q: Is he going to speak?
• action that is going on at a
A: He will be speaking.
certain time in the future
Future I N: He will not be in one year, next
• action that is sure to happen
Progressive speaking. week, tomorrow
in the near future
Q: Will he be speaking?
A: He will have spoken.
• action that will be finished at
N: He will not have
Future II a certain time in the future by Monday, in a week
spoken.
Simple
Q: Will he have spoken?