Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 7

What We (Americans) Really Miss About the 1950s

Tai Lam
California State University, USA
2008

“What We Really Miss About the 1950's" written by Stephanie Coontz is an

article analyzing both the positive and negative effects of social environment and

status in the 1950s. The article starts off with a Knight Ridder poll taken in 1996,

in which more Americans appreciated the period of the 1950s as the best time to

start a family rather than any other decades. However, Coontz suggests that an

uninformed nostalgia for the 1950s on the rise in the contemporary media could

promote harmful political agendas today. Coontz is correct. Such nostalgia not

only causes threatens socio-political instability and development, it also easily

leads to ethnocentrism.

In American culture, of any decade, the one that perhaps is the most

nostalgically looked on is that of the 1950s. It was thought to be a time of

simplicity, balance and innocence, when the Americans was economically

comfortable, and the “American Dream” was a reality for a public. However,

unconditional nostalgia that increasingly appeared in the contemporary media

could bring about the negative aspects to the communities. The rising phenomenon

of such nostalgia can be found in Coontz’s essay several examples that the

traditional family images are derived from the contemporary media. One of these

Lam 1/7
that Coontz cites is “Marty”, the highly praised television shows of the 1950s,

when “ the call for young couples to break from their families was the consistent

theme in 1950s popular culture” (Coontz 38). The rising promotion of the nostalgia

only indeed reflects the positive effects of the contemporary life but much ignores

or disregards its unhelpful aspects. As Coontz states in her essay, television of the

1950s really played a significant role in people's misunderstanding of family life in

the decade. The shows gave people the impression that life was always simple and

happy back then. People seem to be thinking that the family-styles on television is

real life style. But these TV families purely showed individual’s idea of how

families should live. Shows like "Leave It to Beaver" and "Father Knows Best"

(Coontz 38) presented the fantasy of problem solution for the parents. On the other

hand, shows like "I Love Lucy" (38) were mostly pointed at showing troubles to

women. Instead of taking them as a suggestion after watching, most people

viewing these shows today feel inappropriate, and thought they would hardly have

a family as good as such. The social evils of that decade that should be eliminated

were not widely and publicly covered in mass media. On the contrary, “Duck-and-

Cover”, a suggest method for personal protection against the effects of a nuclear

weapon which school children were national-widely taught by the US government

in the 1950s, was promoted in nationwide scale. This personal “cold war”

protection related much with McCarthyism, the politically motivated practice

(theorized by American Senator Joe McCarthy and his allies) of making

Lam 2/7
accusations of disloyalty, subversion, or treason without proper regard for evidence

by overstating Cold War tensions and anti-communist pursuits as in the

Documentary history book by Albert Fried “McCarthyism, The Great American

Red Scare” (1950). Such nostalgia would destroy the currently favored policies in

global cooperation, and would arouse international conflicts that are supposed to

avoid. It’s obvious and easy to know that the call for that decade longing best

serves some left-wing politician purposes. They want to change the world present

order. Such growing nostalgia of more ignorance or less conversance would results

in immeasurable negative effects to the country.

Excessive uninformed nostalgia did really promote harms to political

agendas, Furthermore, it causes threats to socio-political instability and

development. Widespread opposition phenomenon to people who could be defined

as "others" such as “Jews, African Americans, Puerto Ricans, the poor, gays or

lesbians, and ‘the red menace’” (Coontz 39) would arouse sexism, racism and

hostility to ethnic minorities. It was during the 1950s that racial conflict and

discrimination was sharp and fierce in many places of the country (39). These

unhealthy social moods results not only in moral issues, but also in political ones.

The United States is a country of which the government should always be in

progress to make every effort insuring that each individual is allowed his or her

deprivable and undeniable rights as stated in the Constitution. Tracing back to the

time when discrimination among ethnicities was rising would create the social

Lam 3/7
dissention and multipolarization. Thenceforth, the societal stability, national

security and order would be threatened and turned into immeasurable chaos.

Additionally, sexism was a rather serious bias against women. These corrupt

morals could be easily seen in contemporary media as Coontz cites in her essay:

"Father knows Best", in which young women were advised; "the worst thing that

you can do is to try to beat a man at his own game” (45); and they often

experienced commentaries such as: "he criticizes you hairdo - go to the beauty

salon"(45). Another biased representation of the sexes that concerned the portrayal

of man as the norm and women as the appendage not only occurred in internal

structure of the family such as gender and age roles, the male-dominant trend was

also centered on men in socio-financial aspects. Only males had the opportunity to

apply for credit cards and get loans, women were excluded from this privilege and

even from juries ( Coontz 45). Housekeeping and raising a family were considered

ideal female roles during the 1950s, although that standard was less rigid than in

previous decades. With marriage and birthrates booming, women were becoming

wives and mothers at unprecedented levels. Woman today have gained the equality

rights as their counterparts do. Females have nowadays played more and more

important roles in social economic and political fields. They show the equality

power and intelligence in national development. Just imagine what the current

society would be like in retrospect to what women were in the 1950s and how

these tendencies impede the public .

Lam 4/7
The last but not least is that uninformed nostalgic feelings for the 1950s

could easily lead to ethnocentrism. Coontz mentions in her article about the risings

and fallings of this decade by stating social facts. The results that the people who

preferred the 1950's were not of any minorities in the U.S, but only White

Americans appreciated and chose that as the best time to start a family. The 1996

poll did not win an outright majority. Almost all African Americans differed over

other decades rather than 1950s (33). The results shows that the 1950s was really

the best time only to particular community of contemporary Americans. That is the

reason why more Americans of such community appreciate and consider the life at

that time as the stereotype of traditional American life and culture, which can lead

to a group thinking that they are self-righteous and better than another group. It

also gives lead way to judge another culture's way of life. America is known as a

melting pot, consisting of an considerable number of ethnic communities. Each

community varies significantly in the different elements of culture. Culture is one's

designed way of living based on “intellectual customs, knowledge, and behavior”.

One who is with an ethnocentric perspective may view other cultures as deviations

from what is "normal". A historic example of this tendency was when Hitler and

his Nazi followers thought they were better than the other peoples and even judged

the others to be inferior class. The history of the English also serves as a prime

example of ethnocentric beliefs. It is discrimination that plays a direct role in the

ethnocentric belief. During the exploration period the discrimination against blacks

Lam 5/7
by whites was a major controversial issue. Turning back to the 1950s, one can

easily recognize that was the prime and ideal times for mainstream culture and

population. That was the world of the Whites rather than any others. Owing to this

extremist supposition that creates ethnocentrism that leads to make false

assumptions about cultural differences among the ethnicities and also distorts

communication between human beings.

A country’s values are very important to her people. For many years the

American culture and family and their values have been one of the top priorities of

the nation. The nostalgia about the 1950s is primarily thought of the positive

aspects that people were more ontent and looking forward to the future. That was

also, as Coontz analyzes, “America's golden age of family life”, an essential part of

the "American Dream" that Americans are so fond of. The basic idea of success in

America is measured by how well one can provide for their family. Every

individual has the right to be and can be nostalgic about any period life providing

that it encourages and helps with upcoming achievement. Reviewing what have

been learnt in the past helps better learn and understand the present. Social

progress is always ongoing, it cannot be backwards. We are living in a ever-

changing world, what America needs is a visionary for the future. Cherishing fond

dreams of the past but against the present is a hidden harmful deposit for the future.

Moreover, how to harmoniously adapt for temporal and special differences of

Lam 6/7
cultures is the public’s major concern. The healthy basis for civilized thinking, as

assumed, is better neither ethnocentrism nor xenocentrism.

Works cited:

1. Coontz, Stephanie. “What We Really Miss about the 1950s”.


2. “Differences Between Ethnocentrism And Cultural Relativism”. OPPAPERS.COM. 6
June, 2009. < http://www.oppapers.com/essays/Differences-Between-Ethnocentrism-
Cultural-Relativism/108512 >.
3. “How 1950s America Begat 1960s America”. 06-05-2009.
<http://lavender.fortunecity.com/fullmonty/22/sixties.htm>

4. Sinatra, Ashley. “Ethnocentrism in Today's Society”. AC Associated Content News. 09-


19-2007.
<http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/379445/ethnocentrism_in_todays_society_pg
2.html?cat=9>
5. Joe McCarthy, McCarthyism. Spartacus Educational. 06-06-2009.
< http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/USAmccarthy.htm >

Lam 7/7

You might also like