Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Briefs, Legal Memorandum-2
Briefs, Legal Memorandum-2
Terms:
You have learned in previous chapters that part of the legal profession involves a large
quantity of writing. Complaints, answers, discovery documents, motions and legal
memoranda (sometimes called briefs) make up a large part of a court file.
Legalese
There was a time when simple legal writing was frowned upon. Attorneys took great pains
to make language in documents as complicated as possible. One of the reasons legal writing
was so complicated was because attorneys wanted to cover their bases and make sure that
their documents were as complete as possible. As legal writing has evolved, there has been
a movement to move away from convoluted legal writing, also known as legalese to more
contemporary, or plain writing. For example:
In its memorandum to the court in support of its motion for summary judgment, Hal, the
plaintiffs attorney, argued that the party of the first part coveted to convey its entire
interest in the subject real property to the party of the second part. The court, unhappy
with the language, instructs Hal to rewrite his memorandum, excluding any legalese. In his
revised memorandum, Hal writes, The seller agrees to convey its entire interest in the
property to the buyer. The language is clearer, fewer words are used (thus generating less
paper), but the message is still the same.
Words like heretofore, hereinafter, hereinbefore, aforementioned, etc., should be
avoided whenever possible.
damages. It is the plaintiffs contention that the defendant negligently failed to stop at the
stop sign as required by law. The plaintiff has respectfully moved this court for summary
judgment on the ground that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the plaintiff
is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
To focus the readers attention, the memo should always include a statement of the issue
addressed. For example:
Following her statement of the facts, Julie includes the following issue: This memorandum
addresses the issue of whether an operator of a motor vehicle who fails to stop for a
pedestrian in a crosswalk is inherently liable for negligence.
The longest, and most important, part of the memo is the discussion section. This is the
section in which the partys argument is maintained, legal authority is cited, and conclusions
of law are drawn.
Finally, the last section in the memo is the conclusion, which summarizes the arguments
contained within the memo.
Another type of legal memorandum is the appellate brief. Appellate briefs will be discussed
in the last chapter, which concerns appellate practice.
organization must register with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
The next paragraph, or series of paragraphs, should offer a brief answer to the issue. The
purpose of this brief answer is so that the reader does not have to read the entire
memorandum to understand the resolution of the issue. Citation to authority is not
absolutely necessary in this section, but it may be included if deemed appropriate.
It is not essential to include a brief statement of the facts giving rise to the issue, but it is
rarely a bad idea to do so. If the memo specifically discusses the pertinent law and then
applies it to the facts giving rise to the issue, it must also discuss the facts, or the memo
will not be as effective. If the memo is a strict discussion of law, the facts may not be
important; they will always provide, however, a frame of reference. Because the resolution
of a legal issue can turn on one seemingly minute fact, the inclusion of facts is often useful.
The largest portion of the memo is the discussion section. It is in this section that all legal
analysis occurs, as well as any application of the law to the facts giving rise to the issue. As
explained above, all attorneys have an ethical duty to inform the court of authority contrary
to their position; therefore, it is essential that the internal legal memorandum discuss all
aspects of an issue, including contradictory authority.
Finally, the last section of the memorandum is the conclusion, in which a brief summary of
the memorandum is offered.
Cir. 1970); State v. Andrews, 234 F.Supp. 343 (S.D.N.Y. 1953). Her citation is proper.
Note that the two cases from the Second Circuit are not listed together, but are listed, with
the Third Circuits decision, in reverse chronological order.
Citation of more than one state court decision is similar always begin with the highest
state court, then the appellate level, and, finally, the trial court level. The decisions from
each level should be listed in reverse chorological order. If the string citation contains
decisions from more than one state, the citations should be listed alphabetically, by state.
Wthin each state's decisions, the previously discussed rules regarding court rankings and
reverse chronological order apply.