Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Nbso1 10
Nbso1 10
Hay Group
Compensation Review
New Brunswick System Operator (Executive Team)
This document was provided to New Brunswick System Operator in the English
language only.
Compensation Review
September 2011
Prepared by:
Suzanne Cunningham
Ryla Sandor
Contents
Executive Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Background and Mandate . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4
Methodology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Compensation Philosophy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Compensation Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Observations and Key Findings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
Next Steps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
Appendices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .32
01
Executive Summary
2011 Hay Group. All Rights Reserved
Executive Summary
Compensation for NBSOs executive team is on average around the median of the three
comparator markets and thus we would deem compensation overall to be reasonable
As shown below, compensation positioning varies greatly between the different comparator
markets
Base Salary
Utilities
Organizations
Utilities
Organizations
P12
>P75
P57
<P10
>P75
P45
Executive Vice-President
Planning and Development
P20
>P90
P59
<P10
P90
P47
Vice-President Operations
P22
P87
P55
P13
P86
P44
<P10
P81
P38
<P10
P80
P33
Legal Counsel
P31
P89
P64
P17
P86
P49
P20
P84
P47
P14
P79
P41
P75 etc indicates the position within a given market for example P75 indicates that 75 respondents are below and 25 are above while
P50 is the median position of the market
02
Background and Mandate
2011 Hay Group. All Rights Reserved
Hay Group Limited (Hay Group) has been retained by New Brunswick System
Operator (NBSO) to review and assess the existing cash compensation positioning for
its executives. This review includes:
Job evaluation for NBSOs executive team
Competitive benchmarking of these positions and their compensation against an
appropriate comparator group(s)
The compensation review will evaluate the following compensation elements for
NBSOs executive:
Policy Base Salary (the job rate policy)
Actual Base Salary; (what is actually being paid out against the policy rate)
Target and Actual Annual Bonus (% of Base Salary);
Target Total Cash Compensation (Base Salary plus Target Annual Bonus); (the total cash
design)
Actual Total Cash Compensation (Base Salary plus Actual Annual Bonus);
03
Methodology
2011 Hay Group. All Rights Reserved
Methodology
As agreed by NBSO, Hay Group has benchmarked the selected executives against 3
comparator groups. (Please see Appendix A for a list of organizations within these
comparator groups)
These markets were selected based on type or similar industry (in the case of Utilities),
stakeholder interest (in the case of Canadian Broad Public), and regional influence (in
the case of Atlantic Broader Public). When selecting a market for comparison,
organizations need to consider type of industry, where the organization recruits from,
where it loses its talent to, and any regional influences
1. Canadian Utilities market Organizations operating within the Utilities sector from across
Canada
2. Atlantic Broader Public Sector market Public sector and quasi-public sector
organizations operating within Atlantic Canada
3. Canadian Broader Public Sector market Public sector and quasi-public sector
organizations across Canada
By using these comparator groups, Hay Group believes NBSO will be provided with an
appropriate basis of comparison for its executives
Methodology
Methodology (contd.)
NBSOs executives compensation was evaluated against the market data by Job Size
The job evaluation process involves a comparison being made between different
aspects of total job content, defined as Know-How, Problem Solving and Accountability.
The sum of these measures, expressed in job evaluation points, represents the value
of the whole job
Job evaluation allows Hay Group to take into account aspects of a position that cannot be
covered under a simple job match such as the size of the company and number of direct
reports
For example, NBSOs CEO will not be matched to a CEO of a large utilities organization in
Ontario, but instead to a role of the same size (same number of Hay Points) in each
organization that is. This may be a senior director or junior executive in a larger utilities
organization
10
Methodology (contd.)
A job evaluation was completed on NBSOs selected roles as displayed below. Each
position was evaluated by Hay Group. The evaluation for each role was also validated
internally by a second Hay Group consultant. Please see Appendix B for a more
detailed explanation of the Hay Guide Chart-Profile Method of Job EvaluationSM
Incumbent
Proposed
Evaluation
S. Gignac
1868
J. Finn
1232
R. Stairs
1142
M. Jardine
1142
Legal Counsel
K. Roherty
1096
N. Seely
677
Position
President and CEO
Executive Vice-President Planning
and Development
Vice-President Operations
11
04
Compensation Philosophy
2011 Hay Group. All Rights Reserved
12
Compensation Philosophy
13
14
05
Compensation Analysis
2011 Hay Group. All Rights Reserved
16
15
Compensation Analysis
The following section summarizes the results in Canadian dollars from the compensation
review of NBSOs executives
All compensation data in the tables is presented by average and quartile to reflect the 25th,
50th, and 75th percentiles of the market data, as well as, the 10th and 90th percentiles,
where available
16
Cdn$
Policy Base
Salary
Actual Base
Salary
234,100
Utilities Market
P90
P75
P50
P25
P10
Average
# of Organizations
342,000
298,000
277,000
254,000
247,000
285,000
17
362,000
306,000
293,000
261,000
229,000
292,000
17
Actual Compensation
Total
Cash
Bonus % 1
Total
Cash
234,100
234,100
P75
P50
68%
49%
34%
28%
14%
40%
16
592,000
433,000
399,000
341,000
268,000
412,000
17
63%
56%
46%
33%
12%
42%
16
584,000
461,000
427,000
344,000
266,000
421,000
17
P25
P10
-41%
< P10
-45%
< P10
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
196,000
175,000
164,000
*
180,000
9
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
196,000
175,000
164,000
*
180,000
9
35%
>P75
34%
>P75
34%
>P75
296,000
258,000
225,000
183,000
162,000
229,000
96
49%
36%
21%
12%
10%
27%
52
409,000
321,000
251,000
194,000
171,000
273,000
96
54%
37%
17%
11%
0%
27%
52
428,000
319,000
245,000
189,000
165,000
274,000
96
4%
P57
-7%
P43
-4%
P45
Bonus %
P90
*
*
NBSO
700,000
600,000
500,000
400,000
$Cdn
300,000
200,000
100,000
0
Utilities Organizations
17
Executive Vice-President
Planning and Development
Utilities Market
P90
P75
P50
P25
P10
Average
# of Organizations
Policy Base
Salary
Actual Base
Salary
170,000
223,000
208,000
190,000
177,000
154,000
190,000
23
232,000
210,000
193,000
175,000
159,000
195,000
23
Actual Compensation
Total
Cash
Bonus % 1
Total
Cash
170,000
170,000
40%
33%
27%
22%
14%
28%
21
310,000
270,000
245,000
208,000
178,000
248,000
23
43%
38%
31%
17%
10%
28%
21
315,000
280,000
248,000
209,000
172,000
248,000
23
-31%
< P10
-31%
< P10
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
170,000
140,000
137,000
122,000
110,000
140,000
24
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
170,000
140,000
137,000
122,000
110,000
140,000
24
25%
> P90
24%
P90
24%
P90
208,000
182,000
163,000
138,000
127,000
165,000
142
36%
30%
21%
11%
9%
23%
65
261,000
214,000
176,000
143,000
130,000
186,000
142
41%
29%
18%
9%
0%
21%
65
265,000
210,000
174,000
141,000
129,000
185,000
142
4%
P59
-3%
P45
-2%
P47
Bonus %
P90
*
*
P75
P50
P25
P10
NBSO
$Cdn
Position:
150,000
100,000
50,000
0
Utilities Organizations
18
Vice-President Operations
Cdn$
Policy Base
Salary
Actual Base
Salary
155,800
203,000
197,000
176,000
163,000
137,000
175,000
24
217,000
198,000
180,000
159,000
144,000
181,000
24
Actual Compensation
Total
Cash
Bonus % 1
Total
Cash
155,800
155,800
39%
30%
25%
20%
15%
26%
21
285,000
250,000
223,000
184,000
157,000
225,000
24
39%
36%
28%
17%
9%
26%
21
282,000
255,000
227,000
184,000
149,000
224,000
24
300,000
-30%
< P10
-31%
P13
250,000
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
166,000
131,000
128,000
118,000
110,000
134,000
26
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
166,000
131,000
128,000
118,000
110,000
135,000
26
23%
P87
22%
P86
22%
P86
194,000
168,000
153,000
131,000
122,000
155,000
147
34%
29%
20%
10%
9%
22%
65
240,000
192,000
165,000
134,000
123,000
172,000
147
39%
28%
17%
9%
0%
20%
65
243,000
192,000
163,000
133,000
123,000
171,000
147
2%
P55
-6%
P43
-4%
P44
Bonus %
P90
Utilities Market
P90
P75
P50
P25
P10
Average
# of Organizations
P75
P50
P25
P10
NBSO
200,000
$Cdn
Vice-President Operations
150,000
100,000
50,000
0
*
*
Utilities Organizations
19
Cdn$
Policy Base
Salary
Actual Base
Salary
142,000
203,000
197,000
176,000
163,000
137,000
175,000
24
217,000
198,000
180,000
159,000
144,000
181,000
24
Actual Compensation
Total
Cash
Bonus % 1
Total
Cash
142,000
142,000
39%
30%
25%
20%
15%
26%
21
285,000
250,000
223,000
184,000
157,000
225,000
24
39%
36%
28%
17%
9%
26%
21
282,000
255,000
227,000
184,000
149,000
224,000
24
-36%
< P10
-37%
< P10
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
166,000
131,000
128,000
118,000
110,000
134,000
26
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
166,000
131,000
128,000
118,000
110,000
135,000
26
12%
P81
11%
P80
11%
P80
194,000
168,000
153,000
131,000
122,000
155,000
147
34%
29%
20%
10%
9%
22%
65
240,000
192,000
165,000
134,000
123,000
172,000
147
39%
28%
17%
9%
0%
20%
65
243,000
192,000
163,000
133,000
123,000
171,000
147
-7%
P38
-14%
P31
-13%
P33
Bonus %
P90
Utilities Market
P90
P75
P50
P25
P10
Average
# of Organizations
*
*
P75
P50
P25
P10
NBSO
300,000
250,000
200,000
$Cdn
150,000
100,000
50,000
0
Utilities Organizations
20
Legal Counsel
Cdn$
Policy Base
Salary
Actual Base
Salary
155,800
196,000
187,000
168,000
155,000
133,000
168,000
25
207,000
188,000
171,000
151,000
139,000
172,000
25
Actual Compensation
Total
Cash
Bonus % 1
Total
Cash
155,800
155,800
37%
28%
23%
18%
13%
24%
21
269,000
234,000
208,000
173,000
150,000
210,000
25
37%
33%
25%
17%
8%
24%
21
264,000
240,000
211,000
173,000
142,000
210,000
25
300,000
-25%
P14
-26%
P17
250,000
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
163,000
133,000
125,000
116,000
108,000
132,000
27
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
163,000
133,000
125,000
116,000
108,000
132,000
27
26%
P89
25%
P86
25%
P86
187,000
163,000
147,000
127,000
118,000
150,000
148
32%
27%
18%
10%
8%
20%
65
228,000
184,000
158,000
130,000
119,000
165,000
148
36%
26%
16%
8%
0%
19%
65
230,000
184,000
157,000
129,000
119,000
164,000
148
6%
P64
-1%
P48
-1%
P49
Bonus %
P90
Utilities Market
P90
P75
P50
P25
P10
Average
# of Organizations
*
*
P75
P50
P25
P10
NBSO
200,000
$Cdn
Legal Counsel
150,000
100,000
50,000
0
Utilities Organizations
21
Cdn$
Policy Base
Salary
Actual Base
Salary
101,800
142,000
130,000
115,000
102,000
98,000
117,000
29
143,000
130,000
116,000
105,000
95,000
118,000
29
Actual Compensation
Total
Cash
Bonus % 1
Total
Cash
101,800
101,800
15%
15%
15%
10%
5%
13%
20
160,000
142,000
127,000
110,000
100,000
129,000
29
19%
15%
12%
7%
3%
12%
20
156,000
140,000
129,000
110,000
99,000
128,000
29
-21%
P14
160,000
-20%
P13
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
110,000
98,000
92,000
87,000
82,000
94,000
29
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
112,000
98,000
92,000
87,000
82,000
94,000
29
120,000
11%
P84
11%
P80
11%
P79
127,000
115,000
103,000
92,000
86,000
105,000
161
20%
15%
10%
7%
4%
12%
59
140,000
121,000
108,000
95,000
87,000
110,000
161
19%
15%
8%
3%
0%
10%
59
138,000
120,000
107,000
93,000
87,000
110,000
161
-1%
P47
-6%
P38
-5%
P41
Bonus %
P90
Utilities Market
P90
P75
P50
P25
P10
Average
# of Organizations
P75
P50
P25
P10
NBSO
140,000
100,000
$Cdn
80,000
60,000
40,000
20,000
0
*
*
Utilities Organizations
22
06
Observations and Key
Findings
2011 Hay Group. All Rights Reserved
23
23
Salary
Base salary positioning was fairly constant among NBSOs executive team
Compared to the Utilities market, NBSOs base salaries were consistently below the
median of the market, and in many cases below the 25th percentile of comparators as
well
When looking at the Atlantic Canada Broader Public Sector (BPS) market, base
salary positioning rises substantially to above the 75th percentile of comparators
The Canadian BPS market sits in between the other 2 comparator groups
o
Base salary positioning for NBSOs executives is near the median of the market, fluctuating
between the 38th and the 64th percentiles of comparators
24
Bonus
Many organizations in NBSOs comparator markets, with the exception of the Atlantic
Canada BPS, provide their executives with a bonus opportunity
At the median of comparators, target bonuses at NBSOs President and CEO level
ranged from 21% to 34% of base salary (actual bonuses paid out at 17% and 46% of
base salary at the same level)
Target bonuses at the other executives levels, ranged from 10% to 27% of base
salary at the median of the market (actual bonuses were between 8% and 31%)
In the Atlantic Canada BPS market, very few organizations provide their executives
with a bonus opportunity
o
This comment may be skewed by the fact that the sample size of this market is fairly small
25
Target and actual total cash compensation positioning for NBSO drops lower than
base salary positioning since NBSO does not provide its executives with a bonus
opportunity
Compared to the Utilities market, NBSOs total cash compensation were consistently
below the 25th percentile of the market, and in many cases below the 10th percentile
of comparators as well
When looking at the Atlantic Canada Broader Public Sector (BPS) market, total
cash compensation positioning remains consistently above the 75th percentile of
comparators
The Canadian BPS market sits in between the other 2 comparator groups
o
Base salary positioning for NBSOs executives is below the median of the market, fluctuating
between the 31st and the 49th percentiles of comparators
26
Summary
Since the Atlantic Canada BPS is a relatively limited market, we would recommend using this
as a reality check instead of as your primary comparator group
We also believe that other organizations based in Atlantic Canada are trending towards using
a broader Canadian market to benchmark their executives
27
Recommendation
We would recommend NBSO position base salaries for its executives between the
median of the Canadian BPS and the Utilities markets
NBSO may wish to evaluate the positioning of base salaries for its executives in
relation to total cash compensation of comparators as well. If NBSO decides to do
this, we recommend targeting the median of total cash compensation for the
Canadian BPS
o
This will compensate for the fact that many of its comparators provide their executives with a
bonus opportunity
This also takes into account that NBSO will likely look nationwide when recruiting for its
executive roles
This will be important to take into account when trying to attract and retain key talent
NBSO should also take into account compression issues below its executive team.
We understand that a substantial portion of NBSOs workforce is comprised of
professional engineers under a bargaining agreement. NBSOs compensation
philosophy will need to take this into consideration
2011 Hay Group. All Rights Reserved
28
Recommendation
The chart below lays out the median compensation levels in each of the
recommended markets for NBSOs executives
Base Salary - Median
NBSO Actual
Utilities
Organizations
Utilities
Organizations
$234,100
$225,000
$293,000
$245,000
$427,000
Executive Vice-President
Planning and Development
$170,000
$163,000
$193,000
$174,000
$248,000
Vice-President Operations
$155,800
$153,000
$180,000
$163,000
$227,000
$142,000
$153,000
$180,000
$163,000
$227,000
Legal Counsel
$155,800
$147,000
$171,000
$157,000
$211,000
$101,800
$103,000
$116,000
$107,000
$129,000
29
07
Next Steps
2011 Hay Group. All Rights Reserved
30
Next Steps
Establish the compensation philosophy and target compensation positioning for NBSOs
remaining management and non-union employees
Evaluate the remaining management and non-union positions using the Hay Guide
Chart-Profile Method of Job EvaluationSM (we understand that NBSO has a qualified
internal resources who can undertake this project Hay Group would audit the results
for consistency and quality assurance)
Implement results
31
08
Appendices
2011 Hay Group. All Rights Reserved
32
33
34
35
36
37
Enables comparison of unusual or unique jobs to market data based on job size
Drawbacks
38
The number of candidates available for a job or the dollar value the market puts on the
job do not make the job any larger or smaller
These factors are ignored during job evaluation. They are taken into
account in the pay administration process
Know-How
Problem Solving The amount and kind of thinking required such as analyzing,
reasoning, evaluating, creating, and using judgment
Accountability
The opportunity the job has to bring about results to the organization
39