Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Induced Mutation
Induced Mutation
167
Key words: induced mutations, in vitro culture, molecular markers, developmental mutants
Summary
The use of ionizing radiation, such as X-rays, gamma rays and neutrons and chemical mutagens for inducing
variation, is well established. Induced mutations have been used to improve major crops such as wheat, rice,
barley, cotton, peanuts, and beans, which are seed propagated. Since the establishment of the Joint FAO/IAEA
Division of the Nuclear Techniques in Agriculture, more than 1800 cultivars obtained either as direct mutants or
derived from their crosses have been released worldwide in 50 countries. In vegetatively propagated plants, many
of mutants were derived from irradiating rooted stem cuttings, detached leaves, and dormant plants. According to
the FAO/IAEA database, of the 465 mutants released among the vegetatively propagated plants, most are in the
floricultural plants and a few in fruit trees. These include chrysanthemum, Alstroemeria, dahlia, bougainvillea,
rose, Achimenes, begonia, carnation, Streptocarpus, and azalea. The irradiation of in vitro cultured date palm,
apple, potato, sweet potato and pineapple now provides a means to treat large populations, which would not have
been possible before. Irradiation of micropropagated plants, axillary and adventitious buds, apical meristems,
regenerative callus cultures, anthers and microspores, and somatic embryos provides a miniaturized version of
trees and seeds in the Petri dish instead of the field. During the last decade, the use of radio-actively labeled
probes in recombinant DNA research for cloning and mapping plant genes and transgenesis, particularly for
RFLP, microsatellite based DNA fingerprinting, has become a routine procedure. Many homeotic mutants that
change floral development have been isolated in Arabidopsis, Petunia, Antirrhinum and Lycopersicon. Mutants of
Arabidopsis are being used to analyze genes, which determine response to auxins, cytokinins, gibberellin, abscisic
acid and ethylene in plant growth, floral development and senescence, fruit formation and ripening. These mutants
are facilitating the isolation, identification and cloning of the genes, which would ultimately help in designing crops
with improved yield, increased stress tolerance, longer shelf-life and reduced agronomic inputs. The identification
and analysis of mutants by using molecular techniques of DNA fingerprinting and mapping with PCR based
markers, such as RAPDs, AFLP and STMS, and mutant tagging shall bring a new dimension in gene technology.
Already, mutations can be linked to changes in DNA sequences for some plant traits and to establish molecular
maps in structural and functional genomics of crop plants. These in turn would lead to a rapid enhancement of crop
yields and quality.
Introduction
The role of plant breeding in increasing food production and provide sustainable nutrition is well recognized. Increased crop yields, based on the use
of fertilizers, agro-chemicals to control insect pests,
pathogens and weeds, crop rotation and use of ag-
168
becomes even more important to breed plant varieties which can sustain production under the varied
agro-climatic conditions of different regions.
The methods of plant breeding have become increasingly sophisticated since the days of simple selection among natural populations, which consisted of
mixtures of genotypes. The populations arose from
natural variation and sexual recombination. Modern
day plant breeding is based on creating variation, selection, evaluation and multiplication of desired genotypes. To increase efficiency and make short cuts in
each step, the plant breeders combine several techniques together. In so doing, plant breeders have the
options to use in vitro culture for rapid multiplication, molecular methods to select specific genotypes,
mutagenesis to enhance variation, controlled environmental conditions to manipulate growth and flowering,
computers to assist data processing, and international
collaboration to exchange germplasm.
The use of nuclear techniques in plant breeding has
been mostly directed for inducing mutations. Since
the discovery of X-rays about one hundred years ago,
the use of ionizing radiation, such as X-rays, gamma
rays and neutrons for inducing variation, has become
an established technology. Induced mutations have
been used in the improvement of major crops such as
wheat, rice, barley, cotton, peanuts, beans, which are
seed propagated. Since the establishment of the Joint
FAO/IAEA Division of the Nuclear Techniques in Agriculture, more than 1800 cultivars obtained either as
direct mutants or derived from their crosses have been
released worldwide in 50 countries (Maluszynski et
al., 1995). During the last decade, the use of radioactively labeled probes in recombinant DNA research
for cloning and mapping plant genes and transgenesis, particularly for RFLP, microsatellite based DNA
fingerprinting, has become a routine procedure.
Past achievements
The prime strategy in mutation-based plant breeding
has been to upgrade the well-adapted varieties by altering one or two major traits. These include characters
such as plant height, maturity, seed shattering, and
disease resistance, which contribute to increased yield
and quality traits, e.g. oil profile and content, malting
quality, and size and quality of starch granules. For
example, short height genotypes in rice, wheat, barley
and maize have contributed significantly to increasing grain yield because of their resistance to lodging
169
of Green Revolution in India. Several high yielding, early maturing peanut varieties named Yueyou
series were released in China, which were derived
from crosses with the radiation induced mutants. A
recently released peanut mutant variety TG-26, developed at Bhabha Atomic Research Center, Bombay,
India yielded 9.4 tons/h nuts at the farm level. The release of flax cultivars with cooking quality oil linola,
based on induced mutations (Green, 1986; Dribnenki,
1996), is the latest contribution for changing oil quality as had been done before in Canola from rape seed,
and high oleic acid in sunflower.
In vegetatively propagated plants, before the development of in vitro techniques, many mutants in ornamentals, e.g. Achimenes, chrysanthemum, carnation,
roses and Streptocarpus, were obtained by irradiating
rooted stem cuttings, detached leaves, and dormant
plants (Broertjes, 1977). The altered flower colour
and shape, growth-habit (dwarf or trailing) and other
novel phenotype of commercial value were selected.
According to the FAO/IAEA database, of the 465
mutants released among the vegetatively propagated
plants, most were in the floricultural plants and a few
in fruit trees. These included chrysanthemum (187),
Alstroemeria (35), dahlia (34), bougainvillea (9), rose
(27), Achimenes (8), begonia (25), carnation (18),
Streptocarpus (30), and azalea (15) (Maluszynski et
al., 1992). Since the effect of mutation in ornamentals
is very visible, selection for changed flower colour,
shape, and size is easy, and almost anything which
is novel has value. Hence, mutation techniques have
become a major tool for breeding ornamental plants
(Maluszynski et al., 1995). On the other hand, very
few mutant varieties have been released in fruit trees.
Among these are mutants of apple with changed skincolour in Austria (Brunner & Keppl, 1991) and disease
resistance in Japanese pear in Japan (Sanada et al.,
1993), seedless mutants Rio Red and Star Ruby
of grapefruit with deep red colour flesh and juice in
USA (Hensz, 1991). A spineless mutant of pineapple
was reported in Philippines (Lapade et al., 1995).
In banana, Novaria an early ripening mutant with
enhanced flavour was released in Malaysia (Mak et
al., 1996) and two mutants with disease resistance in
Cuba and Costa Rica. Recently, mutants have been
reported for reduced glycoalkaloid content in potato
tubers (Love et al., 1996). However, the technology
has yet to be exploited for the improvement of clonally
propagated crops such as sweet potato, yams, plantain,
strawberry and date palm.
170
is the amount of radiation energy absorbed by the material. The unit of measurement of radiation dose is
Gray (Gy). One Gy is equal to the absorption of 1
J of energy per kilogram of product irradiated. Radiation doses are divided into three broad categories:
high (> 10 kGy), medium (1 to 10 kGy), and low
(<1 kGy). The high doses are used for the sterilization of food products, and low doses to induce
mutations in seed material, where doses range from
60 to 700 Gy for many seed propagated crops, such
as rice, wheat, maize, beans and rape seed. In case of
in vitro cultured plant material, since only milligrams
of tissues and micrograms of cell suspensions are irradiated, the dose levels are much lower. The limited
number of available reports suggest that callus cultures
are much more sensitive to radiation treatment, and require much lower doses (2 to 5 Gy) than stem cuttings
or seeds; with relatively higher doses (15 to 20 Gy)
they turn necrotic or lose their regenerative capacity.
For example, regenerative callus cultures of date palm
above 25 Gy have very poor survival. In potato micropropagated plants, 20 Gy dose gives optimal survival.
In sweet potato, 10 Gy is lethal for callus cultures. In
garlic, callus proliferation and regeneration is inhibited with doses of 8 to 10 Gy. In sugarcane, 20 Gy
dose to callus cultures reduced regeneration by more
than 50%, and 60 Gy reduces regeneration to 2.5%,
the optimal dose being between 5 to 10 Gy (IAEA,
1997).
171
gibberellic acids by Yabuta & Sumiki (1938). In contrast to other auxins and cytokinins, mutants with
altered shoot elongation in pea and maize were used
to investigate gibberellin as early as 1955 and 1956.
The application of GA3 to these mutants restored the
wild-type phenotypes in the dwarf le mutant of pea
and dwarf mutants of maize. Since then many mutants
have been isolated in Arabidopsis, maize, pea, wheat,
and rice, which are involved in GA synthesis and enzymes catalyzing GA biosynthetic pathways (gal-3 in
Arabidopsis; an1 and d3 in maize, ls-1 and lh-2 in
pea, dx in rice). Some show reduced amylase activity
as in GA deficient dwarf mutant in barley. Others are
GA responsive mutants as gai and spy in Arabidopsis.
Some short height mutants, e.g. Rht3 in wheat and D8
in maize are GA-deficient mutants, and do not respond
to applied GA3 (Ross et al., 1997). In the improvement
of many cereals, such as wheat, rice, sorghum and
barley, dwarf mutants (natural or induced) have played
a crucial role in producing lodging-resistant and high
fertilizer responsive varieties.
The genetic analysis of abscisic acid signal transduction has been based on many ABA-deficient
mutants, such as aba1 in Arabidopsis and aba2 in
Nicotiana plumbaginifolia which are orthologous as
shown by transposon-tagging isolation and mapping.
Other mutants with changed sensitivity response to
ABA application, such as abi1, abi2, abi3 and abi4,
show a marked reduction in seed germination (Merlot
& Giraudat, 1997). Such genes are highly valuable for
breeding cereal varieties, which sprout in situ on the
ear during seed maturation.
The Arabidopsis mutant etr1 which confers ethylene synthesis and perception has a major value in
increasing the shelf-life of fruits and extended flowerlife and delayed senescence as shown by its transfer
to tomato and petunia (Wilkinson et al., 1997). Many
such mutants, such as ein, ain in Arabidopsis and Nr
(never ripe) in tomato, have severely limited or impaired response to ethylene. Such mutants shall have
a major role in the international trade of fruits, such
as papaya, pineapple, mango, and banana, and cut
flowers, which rapidly spoil after ripening.
Many homeotic mutants, which develop defective
flowers, have been isolated in Arabidopsis, Petunia,
Antirrhinum and Lycopersicon. Alone or in combination, three groups of genes, A, B, and C regulate the
formation of unique organs in the four whorls of dicot
flowers. Among these are the floral homeotic gene
mutations DEFICIENS A, GLOBOSA, APETLA3,
AGAMOUS and PLENA in Antirrhinum, GREEN
PETALS in petunia, PISTILLATA, SQUAMOSA, FLORICULA and AGAMOUS in tomato (designated TAG1
which change floral structures, such as petals, sepals,
anthers (Pnueli et al., 1994). Homeotic mutants
for leafy cotyledons lec obtained through insertional
mutagenesis in Arabidopsis, are defective in maturation of embryos which remain green (Meinke, 1992).
The fis mutants, which determine seed development
independently of fertilization, have a critical role in
understanding apomixis (Chaudhury et al., 1997).
The isolation of the mutants, which determine development of seed, flowers and fruit, has contributed
significantly to our understanding of the basic patterns
of development in plants. The developmental patterns
in crop plants ultimately determine the yield and quality of the crops. The possibility to modify them will
open up a new dimension in plant breeding. The recent
investigations on the INDETERMINATE(ID1) mutant
in maize confirm the translocation of signal from the
immature leaves to the shoot apical meristem, where it
induces flowering (cf. Aukerman & Amasino, 1998).
This may be the first molecular clue to the elusive
florigen, implicated in the photoperiodic response of
flowering in plants.
172
ing type and the waxy character mutants (wx loci).
Many mutants have been induced in pea by chemical
mutagenesis (Blixt, 1972). At least six loci have been
identified in pea, which modify starch composition
and use. In five of them, the regosus loci (r), the dry
seeds are wrinkled, like the one described by Gregor
Mendel (Mendel, 1865). The mutation analyzed by
Mendel is caused by a transposon-like insertion in the
gene (Bhattacharyya et al., 1990). The alleles produced by chemical mutagenesis all have single base
pair changes (MacLeod, 1994).
Grain texture of wheat soft and hard is controlled by the expression of a single major gene,
Hardness (ha), located on the short arm of chromosome D. Alleles of hardness gene are present on the 5A
and 5B chromosomes of hexaploid wheat but are not
expressed. Friabilin, which is a 15-kDa marker protein for grain softness (ha), consists of two proteins,
puroindoline a and b (pinA and pinB). This protein
is present on the surface of water-washed starch from
soft wheat in high amounts and on hard wheat starch
in small amounts. It is absent in durum wheat starch.
Recently, the hardness and softness of grain in wheat
(Triticum aestivum L. em Thell) has been shown to be
linked to mutation of glycine to serine in pinB or null
mutation in pinA, which leads to the absence of protein pinA. These mutations have been linked to grain
hardness. The complete linkage between this mutation
in pinB and hard grain texture among 5D chromosome substitution lines suggests that pinB is involved
in the control of grain texture. It seems that mutations
in either component of friabilin, pinA, or pinB, can
change grain hardness (Giroux & Morris, 1998).
Future prospects
Two new sets of technologies, in vitro culture and
molecular methods have created a new paradigm in
the use of mutations in crop improvement. The determination of radio-sensitivity tests, irradiation with
optimal doses and multiplication of irradiated material
through tissue culture techniques has assumed a new
dimension. With in vitro culture, milligram quantities
of tissues and calli can now be subjected to mutagenesis, which in future may reduce to micrograms when
routine methods of regeneration from cell suspension cultures have been established. Presently, there
are only a few vegetative propagated plants such as
banana, sugarcane and Alstroemeria that can be regenerated from cell suspension cultures and that also
not on a routine basis. On the other hand, many cultivars of seed propagated crops can now be regenerated
from cell suspension cultures; e.g. maize, rice, wheat,
barley, and soybean. Cells in suspension cultures often become small clumps rather than single cells. It
is anticipated that the radiation dose required to induce mutations in cell suspension cultures would be
even lower than that for callus cultures. We indeed
look forward to the development for routine cell suspension culture techniques and use of bioreactors to
induce mutations both in the seed and vegetatively
propagated plants. Equally important would be the
development of in vitro cell selection systems for resistance to diseases, where toxins can be used in the
culture media as has been shown for the selection
of herbicide tolerance. The regeneration capacity of
such cell suspension cultures and the stable transmission of the selected trait to the derived plant would
be the critical test of such systems. Particularly, if
such cell suspension systems can be developed from
haploid plants derived from microspore cultures, the
probability to obtain recessive mutants in homozygous condition would be enhanced many more times. A
combination of the existing techniques of anther and
microspore culture, cell suspension culture, irradiation
of haploid cells, chromosome doubling and regeneration of doubled haploid plants (Szarejko et al., 1995)
could be used to obtain the desired genotypes in a short
duration.
The identification, and analysis of mutants is based
on the use of molecular techniques of DNA fingerprinting and mapping on PCR based markers, such
as RAPD (Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA,
AFLP (Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism)
and STMS (Sequence-Tagged Microsatellite Sites).
Site-specific insertion of a single base into a targeted
gene by using chimeric RNA/DNA oligonucleotides
as demonstrated in tobacco (Beetham et al., 1999) and
maize (Zhu et al., 1999), and mutant tagging shall
bring a new dimension in gene technology. Already,
mutations can be linked to changes in DNA sequences
for some plant traits, and to establish molecular maps
in structural and functional genomics of crop plants.
These in turn would lead to a rapid enhancement of
crop yields and quality. Induced mutations have thus
assumed a new dimension, not only in crop improvement but also in exploring biology. Thus, after 50
years of dazzling progress, we find ourselves still
dependent on the use of mutants for probing the intricacies of biological processes, and on an understanding of the regulation and physiology of mutation for
173
probing the subtle biological mechanisms responsible
for balancing genomic stability with plasticity (Fox,
1998).
References
Anonymous, 1995. Bureau of Economic and Agricultural Statistics,
Bangkok, 1995.
Aukerman, M.J. & R.M. Amasino, 1998. Floral induction and
florigen. Cell 93: 491494.
Beetham, P.R., P.B. Kipp, X.L. Sawycky, C.J. Arntzen & G.D. May,
1999. A tool for functional plant genomics: chimeric RNA/DNA
oligonucleotides cause in vivo gene-specific mutations. Proc Natl
Acad Sci USA 96: 97748778.
Bhattacharyya, M.K., A.M. Smith, T.H.N. Ellis, C. Hedley & C.
Martin, 1990. The wrinkled-seed character of peas described
Mendel is caused by a transposon-like insertion in a gene
encoding starch branching enzyme. Cell 60: 115122.
Blixt, 1972. Mutation genetics in Pisum. Agri Hortique Genetica 30:
1293.
Broertjes, C., 1977. Mutagen treatment and handling of treated
material. In: Manual on Mutation Breeding. Second Edition,
International Atomic Energy Agency, Tech Rep Ser No 119.
Vienna, pp. 160168.
Brunner, H. & H. Keppl, 1991. Radiation induced apple mutants of
improved commercial value. In: Proc Plant Mutation Breed for
Crop Improvement. Vol. 1. Internl Symp, IAEA and Food Agric
Org of the UN, IAEA SM-311, Vienna, pp. 547552.
Chakrabarti, S.N., 1995. Mutation breeding in India with particular
reference to PNR rice varieties. J Nuclear Agric Biol 24: 7382.
Chaudhury, A.M., L. Ming, C. Miller, S. Craig, E.S. Dennis & W.J.
Peacock, 1997. Fertilization-independent seed development in
Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94: 42234228.
Creech, R., 1965. Genetic control of carbohydrate synthesis in
maize. Genetics 52: 11751186.
Dribnenki, J.C.P., A.G. Green & G.N. Atlin, 1996. LinolaTM 989
low linolenic flax. Can J Plant Sci 76: 329331.
Fox, M.S., 1998. Some recollections and reflections on mutation
rates. Genetics 148: 14151418.
Giroux, M.J. & C.F. Morris, 1998. Wheat grain hardness results
from highly conserved mutations in the friabilin components
puroindoline a and b. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 62626266.
Green, A.G., 1986. A mutant genotype of flax (Linum usitatissimum) containing very low levels of linolenic acid in its seed
oil. Can J Plant Sci 66: 499503.
Hannah, C., M. Giroux & C. Boyer, 1993. Biotechnological modification of carbohydrates for sweet corn and maize improvement.
Scientia Horticulturae 55: 177197.
Hensz, R.A., 1991. Mutation breeding of grapefruit (Citrus paradisi
Macf.). In: Proc Plant Mutation Breed for Crop Improvement.
Vol. 1. Internl Symp IAEA and Food Agric Org of the UN, IAEA
SM-311, Vienna, pp. 533536.
IAEA, 1997. Report 2nd FAO/IAEA Research Co-ordination Meeting on in vitro techniques for selection of radiation induced
mutants adapted to adverse environmental conditions. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna.
Lapade, A.G., A.M.S. Veluz & I.S. Santos, 1995. Genetic improvement of the Queen variety of pineapple through induced mutation
and in vitro culture techniques. In: Proc Induced Mutations and
Molec Techn for Crop Improvement. Internl Symp IAEA and
Food Agric Org of the UN, IAEA, Vienna, pp. 684687.